|Exam Name||:||United States Medical Licensing Examination|
|Questions and Answers||:||400 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||April 22, 2019|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||Pass4sure USMLE Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure USMLE Full Version|
Exam Questions Updated On :
So easy coaching brand new USMLE exam with this question bank.
It were years and i was caught at the identical designation, it emerge as like being glued to the chair with fevicol. Initially you agree with you studied, simply wait suitable matters are to be had time. However then your staying power wears off and you gotta take a stand earlier than its too late. For the purpose that my art work includes more frequently than not managing a USMLE customers base I determined to ace it and end up the he is aware of all approximately USMLE dude in the office. Upon a buddies steering I attempted your USMLE demo from killexams.com, loved and it and moved onto a buy. Your exam simulator is fantastic and today your examine package has made me the cutting-edge USMLE manager.
updated and real examination financial institution today's USMLE.
My exam preparation occurred into 44 right replies of the aggregate 50 within the planned seventy five mins. It worked just in reality the exquisite. I got an appealing revel in depending at the killexams.com dumps for the exam USMLE. The aide clarified with compact answers and affordable instances.
here are hints & tricks with dumps to certify USMLE exam with excessive scores.
After trying several books, I become pretty dissatisfied no longer getting the right material. I became searching out a guideline for exam USMLE with easy language and nicely-prepared content. killexams.com Q&A fulfilled my want, as it explained the complex subjects within the only manner. In the real exam I were given 89%, which was past my expectation. Thank you killexams.com, for your top class guide-line!
Try out these real USMLE dumps.
Heres but every different vote for killexams.com because the first rate manner to put together for USMLE exam. I opted for this kit to prepare for my USMLE exam. I didnt set my hopes too immoderate and stored an eye fixed constant on the reputable syllabus to make sure I do not skip over any topics, and it have become out that killexams.com had all of them protected. The guidance became very strong and that i felt assured on the exam day. And what virtually made killexams.com fantastic emerge as the moment when I found out their questions had been precisely similar to what real exam had. Simply as promised (which I didnt simply assume to be right - you recognize the manner it actually works once in a while!). So, this is extraordinary. Dont hesitate, cross for it.
That changed into incredible! I got today's dumps present day USMLE examination.
I have been so inclined my entire manner yet I recognize now that I had to get a pass in my USMLE and this may make me popular likely and sure i am brief of radiance yet passing my tests and solved almost all questions in just75 mins with killexams.com dumps. Multiple awesome men cant convey a exchange to planets way however they could simply will assist you to realise whether or not youve got been the precept fellow who knew a way to try this and i need to be recognized in this international and make my own unique imprint.
No supply is greater proper than this USMLE source.
are you able to odor the candy perfume of victory I know i will and its miles simply a completely lovely smell. you may smell it too if you go online to this killexams.com if you want to put together for your USMLE test. I did the same element right earlier than my test and turned into very happy with the provider provided to me. The centers right here are impeccable and once you are in it you wouldnt be concerned approximately failing in any respect. I didnt fail and did quite nicely and so are you able to. try it!
What are requirements to bypass USMLE exam in little attempt?
killexams.com questions and answers helped me to apprehend what precisely is anticipated in the exam USMLE. I prepared rightly within 10 days of guidance and completed all of the questions of exam in eighty mins. It incorporate the topics similar to exam component of view and makes you memorize all the subjects without issues and correctly. It moreover helped me to know the manner to manipulate the time to finish the exam before time. Its miles incredible approach.
Feeling difficulty in passing USMLE exam? Q&A bank is here.
Word of mouth is a completely robust manner of advertising for a product. I say, when something is so precise, why not do a little effective exposure for it I would really like to spread the word approximately this certainly one of a kind and truely tremendous killexams.com which helped me in acting outstandingly well in my USMLE exam and exceeding all expectations. I could say that this killexams.com is one of the maximum admirable online teaching ventures I have ever stumble upon and it deserves a number of popularity.
Killing the examination become too easy! I dont assume so.
I skip in my USMLE exam and that turned into not a simple pass but a extraordinary one which I should inform everyone with proud steam stuffed in my lungs as I had got 89% marks in my USMLE exam from reading from killexams.com.
I want modern dumps of USMLE examination.
Im very masses happy along with your test papers particularly with the solved issues. Your test papers gave me courage to seem in the USMLE paper with self assurance. The end result is seventy seven.25%. Over again I complete heartedly thank the killexams.com employer. No other manner to pass the USMLE exam apart from killexams.com model papers. I in my view cleared distinct test with the help of killexams.com question economic organization. I suggest it to each one. If you need to pass the USMLE exam then take killexams.com help.
classification 2 diabetes is an important contributor to ailment burden globally. a few systematic experiences guide the efficacy of lifestyle interventions in combating type 2 diabetes in adults; besides the fact that children, tremendously little consideration has been paid to the generalizability of analyze findings. This study systematically experiences the reporting of exterior validity add-ons and generalizability of diabetes prevention experiences. lifestyle intervention experiences for the prevention of category 2 diabetes in adults with at the least 6 months' follow-up, published between 1990 and 2011, have been recognized via searches of essential digital databases. exterior validity reporting turned into rated the usage of an assessment tool, and all evaluation became undertaken in 2011. a total of 31 simple experiences (n=ninety five papers) met the selection criteria. All reviews lacked full reporting on exterior validity elements. Description of the examine pattern, intervention, birth agents, and participant attrition quotes have been said by way of most experiences. despite the fact, few reports reported on the representativeness of individuals and settings, strategies for recruiting settings and start agents, prices, and how interventions can be institutionalized into hobbies service birth. it is uncertain to what extent the findings of diabetes prevention stories apply to guys, socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, these living in rural and far flung communities, and to low- and center-profits international locations. Reporting of external validity accessories in diabetes prevention reviews needs to be more desirable to improve the facts base for the interpretation and dissemination of these courses into coverage and observe.
the us medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) has a mission to give protection to the health of the public. Passing these examinations is required for U.S. states and territories to accept as true with granting an unrestricted medical license to a health care provider. USMLE comprises three Steps (four exams). Step 1 is a multiple-option examination assessing an examinee’s knowledge of foundational science ideas relevant to medicine. Step 2 medical expertise (CK) assesses the ability to apply scientific ideas to medical medicine. Step 2 medical expertise (CS) makes use of standardized sufferers to test the examinee’s ability to accumulate tips from patients, function actual examinations, and communicate findings to patients and colleagues. Step three uses varied-choice questions and computerized affected person circumstances to check an examinee’s potential to follow in an unmonitored surroundings.
This examination sequence can also represent a barrier to follow for definite aspiring physicians. A prosperous body of research exists for the USMLE, together with analysis on demographic changes in USMLE ratings. a few subgroups were examined, including analyses grouped by using sex and self-recognized race. These outdated experiences have examined complete said rankings with a spotlight on secondary use, corresponding to postgraduate residency screening and alternative.
inspecting alterations by using intercourse on the precursor to the present USMLE Step 1, the country wide Board of scientific Examiners (NBME) half I examination, Case and colleagues1 found that guys performed enhanced than ladies on regular by way of about 0.three commonplace deviations (SDs). This difference became at the least partly defined with the aid of covariates similar to scientific school Admission look at various (MCAT) ratings, undergraduate grade factor standard (GPA), and school selectivity. This discovering has been replicated.2 A later examine examining Step 1 scores showed a similar pattern of guys performing superior than women, even after controlling for covariates.3 Analyses on NBME part II, the precursor to Step 2 CK, confirmed ladies performing in addition to or more suitable than guys.1 This effect was once more seen the usage of the latest Step 2 structure, showing ladies reasonably outperforming guys on Step 2 CS and CK.four–6
Comparably much less analysis has been performed on racial changes in USMLE rankings. Our literature search recognized just one study, the usage of data from the older half I layout. That analysis showed racial differences wherein white college students performed maximum among self-identified racial corporations, followed via Asian/Pacific Islanders, Hispanics, then blacks. Controlling for the MCAT, undergraduate GPA, and school selectivity reduced, however did not dispose of, ameliorations.2
USMLE Step three ratings have got less attention than Steps 1 or 2. correctly passing Step 3 became most linked to being a local English-speakme U.S. citizen from a U.S. school. although intercourse regarded statistically huge, with men outperforming girls, the functional magnitude turned into small.7 collectively, previous work means that guys outperform women on Step 1, yet the vogue is reversed for Step 2 and negligible for Step three. Some racial differences have additionally been viewed, albeit from a examine the use of older facts on a examine layout now not used.
These reviews have instructed a narrative of usual demographic ameliorations throughout the USMLE series. Yet the story goes back 24 years, spans outdated verify formats, examines demographic features in my opinion, and makes use of a number of methodological processes. To give information on viable subgroup efficiency differences, this examine examines many demographic traits of activity simultaneously inside one modeling framework, beneath the existing Step testing layout, for all computer-based USMLE Step tests. current information on subgroup performance modifications can also inform how accreditation groups, scientific faculties, and postgraduate training courses use USMLE facts above and past the primary supposed use of assessing passing scores for medical licensure.approachDesign, sample, and statistics assortment
We used a go-sectional evaluation of historic, deidentified facts. moral approval with “exempt” popularity became granted with the aid of the American Institutes for analysis, Washington, DC. Examinees’ first-time ratings for Step 1, Step 2 CK, and Step three have been included if the examinee took Step 1 right through or after 2010, accomplished Step 3 via 2015, and said demographic guidance. As our research became supposed to handle secondary use of scores, we sampled examinees who had progressed through the examination series and taken each of the computerized Steps. To center of attention on consequences from U.S. and Canadian allopathic and osteopathic clinical faculties, we didn't consist of foreign medical graduates in this analysis.Measurements
dependent variables were rankings on desktop-based USMLE Step examinations: Step 1, Step 2 CK, and Step 3. examine-taker qualities had been self-said on the utility to sit down for the first USMLE examination, and blanketed sex (male as reference category), race (self-recognized: Asian/Pacific Islander; black not of Hispanic starting place; and Hispanic, with white as reference class), U.S. citizenship fame (U.S. citizen as reference class), English as a 2nd language (ESL) (native English speaker as reference class), and age at first Step 1 effort (grand suggest founded). Composite MCAT scores (from first take, grand suggest headquartered) and undergraduate GPA (grand mean founded) have been received from the affiliation of yank medical colleges (AAMC). The MCAT composite included the verbal reasoning, biological sciences, and actual sciences sections and excluded the writing pattern, because the former sections had been proven to be regarding USMLE ratings and one yet another while the latter section has not.3 We did not include racial classes with too few examinees (American Indian/Alaskan Native, n = one hundred seventy five), nor from the classes “do not need to respond,” “distinct,” or “other.” Examinees had been protected in the event that they agreed to allow their deidentified statistics for use for research applications.statistics analysis
Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM)eight has been used in the past in this line of analysis, with most ranking variance within, now not between, schools9 or situations.5 nonetheless, HLM is greater acceptable in datasets with a nested structure. medical college students were nested within clinical schools for this evaluation performed using SAS statistical utility, version 9.three (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina) with maximum chance estimation. Multicollinearity amongst predictors is not a priority right here as a result of variables prone to be correlated are used as control variables and not variables of hobby. moreover, centering of variables is used to aid in the interpretation of the resulting coefficients, and has the secondary improvement of cutting back the relationships among the variables under examine.
First, we produced descriptive records for all blanketed variables. principally attracted to how examinee features predicted USMLE efficiency and never in how these relationships distinct through school, we estimated random intercept models permitting schools to have distinctive intercepts but not slopes. This choice become pushed by way of our activity in basic demographic outcomes and also through small pattern sizes from faculty-stage clusters. These fashions constrain the relationships between demographic characteristics and USMLE performance to continue to be the same across colleges, although college intercepts may additionally range.
because the analysis questions had been to be aware demographic ameliorations amongst ratings and even if covariates attenuated these differences, model constructing was guided by means of the analysis questions. We ran right here fashions with Step 1, Step 2 CK, after which Step 3 because the stylish variable:
For the dichotomous variables in all models, we generated an impact dimension measure along with each and every coefficient. as a result of coefficients are interpretable when it comes to USMLE ranking points, and all Step examinations are scaled to a base reference group with an SD of 20 elements, the effect dimension used was the coefficient divided via 20 and is interpretable as differences in SD devices. Cohen counseled that an effect size in SD instruments could be considered small if ≥ 0.2 yet < 0.5, medium if ≥ 0.5 yet < 0.8, and massive if ≥ 0.eight.10 We supplied effect sizes as a result of, given the sample dimension we used, statistical importance is probably going.outcomes
a complete of 45,154 examinees from 172 colleges healthy look at standards (ordinary 262.52 examinees per college, SD a hundred ninety.27, latitude 1–820). table 1 suggests descriptive data for the sample. Tables 2, 3, and four sequentially reveal the modeling outcomes with USMLE Steps 1, 2, and 3 because the based variable. The ICC for predicting Step 1 scores is 0.12. hence, 88% of the variance in ratings turned into as a result of pupil modifications. inspecting Step 1 effects in desk 2, the intercept for the demographics model is the anticipated performance when all demographic variables characterize the reference class—it really is, for a local English-speaking white male U.S. citizen at standard age. The coefficients are interpreted as the difference in expected Step 1 rankings in comparison with the reference group with all others steady. accordingly, a feminine ESL test taker, or any nonwhite examine taker, would be expected to have a decrease Step 1 ranking. in a similar fashion, rankings are envisioned to be lessen for each and every yr of age above standard. Being a non-U.S. citizen would boost the expected rating.
adding GPA and MCAT ranking to arrive at the covariates mannequin (penultimate column of desk 2) stronger predictions of Step 1 ratings, as shown with the aid of the reduce error variance at each degrees along with greater fit indices (−2 log likelihood, Akaike counsel criterion and Bayesian suggestions criterion). since the added covariates were grand mean based, the intercept is now interpreted as the estimated Step 1 efficiency of a look at various taker with the demographic characteristics described above who is additionally of ordinary GPA and MCAT rating. For every 1-aspect enhance in GPA above the usual price, anticipated Step 1 performance multiplied via 11.91 aspects. expected scores additionally extended if an individual had above-average composite MCAT performance. After together with these variables, the variables representing U.S. citizenship and ESL reputation were no longer massive. it really is, these demographic alterations were defined by means of differences in GPA and MCAT scores. The coefficients for black or Hispanic look at various takers have been attenuated, however the Asian coefficient remained identical.
The ICC for Step 2 CK is comparable to that of Step 1: 0.10. table 3 shows outcomes with Step 2 CK rankings because the stylish variable; all demographic variables under examine had been statistically tremendous. The intercept retained the equal interpretation as that of the Step 1 demographics model, albeit for the prediction of Step 2 CK ratings. All demographic variables alter the prediction of Step 2 CK performance in the equal course as the Step 1 mannequin, other than intercourse. comparable to old experiences of Step 2 performance, we found that girls have been estimated to have bigger efficiency than men (by 0.34 features). including covariates once again more advantageous the model as shown by the lower in error variance and healthy indices. The demographic variable coefficients once again changed under this mannequin, with the impact of intercourse elevated and U.S. citizenship fame no longer a significant model predictor. people with above-typical GPA, composite MCAT, and Step 1 ratings were envisioned to have higher efficiency, whereas these with above-commonplace age had been predicted to be lower. And, the addition of the GPA and MCAT covariates once more attenuated changes for Asian, black, Hispanic, and ESL examinees.
The ICC for Step 3 is 0.12. lastly, desk four studies the parameters for the prediction of USMLE Step 3 performance. The course and magnitude of the demographic variables had been corresponding to these from Tables 2 and 3, aside from intercourse, which is nonsignificant. including covariates to the model once more aided within the prediction of Step three scores, with higher stages of Step 1, Step 2 CK, GPA, and composite MCAT increasing the prediction of Step 3 performance and better age reducing the expected ranking. With introduced covariates, U.S. citizenship became now not giant; racial and ESL symptoms are attenuated when covariates were included.dialogue
This analyze extends and updates old analyses through the use of the contemporary USMLE Step format, analyzing the have an effect on of all self-pronounced examinee features simultaneously throughout all computerized Steps, and analyzing the affect of critical premedical college covariates. Our findings show that, on usual, demographic modifications exist in USMLE rankings. within the nonadjusted models, sex consequences were present, youngsters they varied depending on the Step below consideration. men outperformed girls on Step 1, girls outperformed men on Step 2, and there became no difference on Step three. ESL test takers and self-recognized nonwhite businesses consistently carried out lessen on all three Steps; despite the fact their practical significance varies, the size of the coefficients remained equivalent throughout Steps. Citizenship and ESL repute showed statistical, yet not practical, significance. Age perpetually showed a terrible relationship with Step ratings, with examinees above regular age envisioned to have reduce ratings.
a different constant discovering emerged: including covariates on a check taker’s old examination and undergraduate performance increases the accuracy of prediction and, with the exception of sex, appreciably reduces the expected effects of demographic traits. In some circumstances, the results of citizenship and ESL reputation had been erased thoroughly. In others, the consequences have been attenuated. as an instance, self-identified blacks were envisioned to ranking 16 elements reduce on all Step examinations in comparison with whites in the demographics-simplest model, representing greater than three-fourths of an SD. When extra premedical school covariates had been protected, these differences had been decreased to 4 or 5 elements, around one-quarter of an SD. more than 10 points of a black look at various taker’s envisioned performance have been defined with the aid of covariates.
There are barriers to this study. First, despite the fact our analysis geared toward understanding individual characteristics and their affiliation with USMLE efficiency, 10% to 12% of ranking efficiency is still to be explained through clinical college features. scientific faculties have other ways of assisting students through their curricula, and distinctive guidelines concerning even if students need to take USMLE Steps for advertising or commencement (see, as an instance, https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/cir/406442/10b.html). Measuring and knowing how faculties make contributions to examination efficiency throughout demographic corporations may be beneficial in realizing examinee efficiency and might extra attenuate the demographic consequences considered right here. 2nd, additional features of training, protected self-chosen specialties, also have been shown to affect USMLE performance11 yet are not considered here. Third, undergraduate associations differ in their grading standards, which affects the comparability of GPAs for individuals throughout associations. Fourth, this evaluation most effective examines the computer-based USMLE Step tests; related analyses for Step 2 CS are deliberate.
Implications of these findings are critical to two more and more important concerns in drugs and clinical education: using a score, on an examination intended for scientific licensure, as a excessive-stakes screen or alternative criterion for residency alternative; and the recruitment and retention of a various health professional group of workers.
it is largely accepted that residency software directors, with the daunting project of screening numerous applications, use USMLE rankings to monitor candidates for interviews.12,13 moreover, this practice has been associated in the past with knowledge bias towards definite racial and ethnic minorities.14 If applicants don't meet this display, they are not any longer regarded regardless of their doubtlessly having traits or experiences that translate to fitting advantageous physicians. extra these days, there was a constant message from leaders in the tutorial community in addition to from the NBME to in the reduction of or get rid of using USMLE scores, especially Step 1, as a barrier to residency option.15,16 These calls acknowledge the mission of the USMLE program, and factor to proof where USMLE ratings can also be predictive of efficiency on subsequent assessments, akin to area of expertise in-training and certification examinations.17 Relationships have additionally been proven between scores on subcomponents of the USMLE and residency application director efficiency rankings, as well as for ratings on certain USMLE Steps and disciplinary action in apply.18–20 while analysis is ongoing involving the predictive cost of licensing examinations on scientific observe measures,21 the debate is still over the proof, or lack thereof, for the use of USMLE ratings as a threshold for residency candidate consideration.22 Some investigators have stated that, regardless of always lessen scores on the USMLE acquired via underrepresented minority residents, no change existed in observed structured medical examinations in the beginning of residency.23
In 2015, black scientific students comprised lower than 6% of scientific faculty graduates within the u.s., and Latinos under 5%.24 during the last 10 years, the AAMC’s Holistic review initiative has provided suggestions and components for clinical admissions programs to “widen the lens” when viewing prospective candidates, emphasizing the candidates’ experiences and personal attributes, apart from their academic metrics.25 An admissions process that specializes in mission-based initiatives is likely to provide distinct students, viewpoints, experiences, and sooner or later a group of workers reflecting the same. The theory of holistic assessment has carried into graduate medical education, particularly given the need for software administrators to investigate professionalism and conversation abilities all the way through the brief preference season, as neatly because the priority that graduate medical education classes are inserting on recruiting and conserving distinct cohorts of trainees.26,27 Given our findings, residency application directors could be capable of extra easily have interaction in holistic overview of applicants, and might even be stimulated to deliver extra elements to trainees in need of support for success on licensure and certification examinations. Some fitness professions education programs have validated the effectiveness that targeted substances or mentoring might also have on standardized look at various scores.28 furthermore, it would be important to agree with how usual application contrast metrics—akin to certifying board move prices—might avoid efforts to strengthen diversity in medication throughout specialties.29
Subgroup examinee performance on standardized checks need not be equal for a look at various to satisfy the typical of fairness.30 in the case of our study, as in a single old study,2 prior educational efficiency explains a great deal of the demographic ameliorations in rankings. however mean efficiency between racial classes, specially for blacks and Hispanics, seems at the beginning tremendous, “the followed racial and ethnic modifications replicate the reduce suggest MCAT rankings and GPAs of underrepresented minority college students.”2(p678) And, MCAT scores themselves haven't proven facts of bias towards underrepresented minority test takers.31 because the closing performance changes are unexplained, additional work is required to identify components contributing to the remaining demographic modifications and establish components that may support medical educators in picking candidate examinees who may need additional support with USMLE instruction.Acknowledgments:
The authors thank Monica Cuddy and Kimberly Swygert for their useful feedback on early drafts of this manuscript.References 1. Case SM, Becker DF, Swanson DB. Performances of men and women on NBME part I and half II: The more things alternate. Acad Med. 1993;sixty eight(10 suppl):S25–S27. 2. Dawson B, Iwamoto CK, Ross LP, Nungester RJ, Swanson DB, Volle RL. efficiency on the national Board of scientific Examiners. part I examination by using guys and women of diverse race and ethnicity. JAMA. 1994;272:674–679. 3. Cuddy MM, Swanson DB, Clauser BE. A multilevel analysis of examinee gender and USMLE Step 1 performance. Acad Med. 2008;83(10 suppl):S58–S62. 4. Cuddy MM, Swygert KA, Swanson DB, Jobe AC. A multilevel analysis of examinee gender, standardized affected person gender, and united states medical licensing examination Step 2 medical potential verbal exchange and interpersonal potential ratings. Acad Med. 2011;86(10 suppl):S17–S20. 5. Swygert KA, Cuddy MM, van Zanten M, Haist SA, Jobe AC. Gender differences in examinee performance on the Step 2 medical advantage data gathering (DG) and patient word (PN) accessories. Adv health Sci Educ idea Pract. 2012;17:557–571. 6. Cuddy MM, Swanson DB, Clauser BE. A multilevel analysis of the relationships between examinee gender and u.s. scientific Licensing exam (USMLE) Step 2 CK content area performance. Acad Med. 2007;eighty two(10 suppl):S89–S93. 7. De Champlain A, pattern L, Dillon GF, Boulet JR. Modeling longitudinal performances on the U.S. medical Licensing Examination and the have an effect on of sociodemographic covariates: An software of survival statistics evaluation. Acad Med. 2006;81(10 suppl):S108–S111. 8. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical Linear fashions: functions and statistics evaluation methods. 2002.2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 9. Cuddy MM, Swanson DB, Dillon GF, Holtman MC, Clauser BE. A multilevel evaluation of the relationships between selected examinee features and united states clinical Licensing Examination Step 2 clinical abilities efficiency: Revisiting historic findings and asking new questions. Acad Med. 2006;eighty one(10 suppl):S103–S107. 10. Cohen J. Statistical energy analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. 1988.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum friends. 11. Sawhill AJ, Dillon GF, Ripkey DR, Hawkins RE, Swanson DB. The have an effect on of postgraduate practising and timing on USMLE Step 3 performance. Acad Med. 2003;seventy eight(10 suppl):S10–S12. 12. green M, Jones P, Thomas JX Jr. option standards for residency: effects of a national program directors survey. Acad Med. 2009;84:362–367. 13. national Resident Matching software. records free up and research Committee. effects of the 2016 NRMP program Director Survey. 2016.Washington, DC: countrywide Resident Matching software. 14. Edmond MB, Deschenes JL, Eckler M, Wenzel RP. Racial bias in the usage of USMLE Step 1 rankings to provide interior drugs residency interviews. Acad Med. 2001;seventy six:1253–1256. 15. Prober CG, Kolars JC, First LR, Melnick DE. A plea to reassess the role of u.s. scientific Licensing Examination Step 1 scores in residency preference. Acad Med. 2016;91:12–15. sixteen. Katsufrakis PJ, Uhler TA, Jones LD. The residency utility method: Pursuing stronger results via stronger knowing of the considerations. Acad Med. 2016;91:1483–1487. 17. Dillon GF, Swanson DB, McClintock JC, Gravlee GP. the relationship between the American Board of Anesthesiology half 1 certification examination and the us medical Licensing Examination. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:276–283. 18. Cuddy MM, Winward ML, Johnston MM, Lipner RS, Clauser BE. Evaluating validity evidence for USMLE Step 2 medical knowledge statistics gathering and statistics interpretation rankings: Does performance predict background-taking and physical examination rankings for first-year inside medication residents? Acad Med. 2016;ninety one:133–139. 19. Winward ML, Lipner RS, Johnston MM, Cuddy MM, Clauser BE. the relationship between communique ratings from the USMLE Step 2 clinical advantage examination and verbal exchange rankings for first-yr interior medication residents. Acad Med. 2013;88:693–698. 20. Cuddy MM, young A, Gelman A, et al. Exploring the relationships between USMLE performance and disciplinary motion in practice: A validity study of ranking inferences from a licensure examination. Acad Med. 2017;ninety two:1780–1785. 21. Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Dauphinee WD, et al. association between licensure examination ratings and practice in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288:3019–3026. 22. McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, Wayne DB. Are u.s. clinical Licensing examination Step 1 and a couple of ratings legitimate measures for postgraduate scientific residency alternative decisions? Acad Med. 2011;86:forty eight–52. 23. Lypson ML, Ross PT, Hamstra SJ, Haftel HM, Gruppen LD, Colletti LM. facts for increasing range in graduate clinical education: The competence of underrepresented minority residents measured by way of an intern purpose structured clinical examination. J Grad Med Educ. 2010;2:354–359. 26. King A, Mayer C, Starnes A, Barringer okay, Beier L, Sule H. the use of the association of american scientific colleges standardized video interview in a holistic residency application evaluate. Cureus. 2017;9:e1913. 27. Van Voorhees AS, Enos CW. variety in dermatology residency courses. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2017;18:S46–S49. 28. Girotti JA, Park YS, Tekian A. guaranteeing a fair and equitable preference of students to serve society’s fitness care wants. Med Educ. 2015;49:eighty four–ninety two. 29. Berger JS, Cioletti A. standpoint from 2 graduate clinical training deans: utility overload within the residency suit system. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;eight:317–321. 30. American academic analysis association, American Psychological association, national Council on measurement in schooling. requisites for educational and Psychological checking out. 2014.Washington, DC: American tutorial analysis affiliation. 31. Davis D, Dorsey JK, Franks RD, Sackett PR, Searcy CA, Zhao X. Do racial and ethnic community ameliorations in efficiency on the MCAT examination replicate check bias? Acad Med. 2013;88:593–602. © 2019 by means of the affiliation of american medical faculties supply
academic Medicine94(three):364-370, March 2019.related movies
information is briefly unavailable. Please are attempting once more quickly.Readers Of this text additionally read
right here are postal addresses and make contact with numbers of the facilities, where the U.S. scientific Licensing Examination is held in India. This has started seeing that can also this year, with USMLE Step 1, and the Step 3 examination has also been shifted to the computing device-based mostly trying out (CBT) for the reason that November 11. ChennaiPROMETRIC testing PVT. LTD.NO - 15/7, 2nd FLOORJAGANNATHAN street, NUNGAMBAKKAMCHENNAI 600 034 TEL : 044-2824 1840 2. HyderabadPROMETRIC testing PVT. LTD.AVENUE 1, road 20, PLOT 1672, road 12BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD 500 034TEL : 040- 2330 3903 three. AhmedabadPROMETRIC trying out PVT. LTD.301-302 ABHIJEET IIMITHA KHALI SIX ROADSELLISBRIDGE,AHMEDABAD 380 006TEL: 079-2656 1088 four. BangalorePROMETRIC checking out PVT LTDMAINI SADAN, IST FLOORNO. - 38, LAVELLE highway, 7th pass RDBANGALORE 560 001.TEL: 080 - 2229 1770 5. KolkataPROMETRIC testing PVT. LTD.FLAT 1/C SUKH SAGAR BLDG,,2/5 SARAT BOSE ROADKOLKATA 700 020.TEL: 033-2485 2792 6. AllahabadInstitute of Psychological & educational Measurement119/25-A, Mahatma Gandhi MargCivil lines, Allahabad 211 001.TEL: 0532-2427048 7. MumbaiPROMETRIC trying out PVT LTD.MARWAH house, SAKI VIHAR highway,SAKINAKA, ANDHERI (E)MUMBAI 400 072.TEL: 022-2857 3160 eight. MumbaiUnited States schooling foundation in India,4 - New Marine strains,Mumbai four hundred 020.Tel: 022 - 2262-4603 9. New DelhiPROMETRIC checking out PVT LTD.2ND ground,DLF INFINITY TOWER-AGURGAON 122 002.TEL : 0124 - 4147700
Viewers in these eight cities are requested to supply locality landmarks using instructions, travel facilities from railway stations, airports or intercity bus depots. This can be of sizeable cost to younger contributors of the scientific fraternity. we shall be happy to publicly renowned the information that we acquire.
While it is hard errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals get sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater part of other's sham report objection customers come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. We never bargain on our review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is imperative to us. Extraordinarily we deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report grievance, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you see any false report posted by our rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protestation or something like this, simply remember there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of good administrations because of their advantages. There are a great many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams rehearse questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our example questions and test brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
650-026 brain dumps | 000-M62 brain dumps | 000-956 practice exam | 250-255 cheat sheets | 190-831 real questions | PW0-105 braindumps | VCP410-DT pdf download | 920-503 braindumps | 1T6-530 free pdf | 648-232 free pdf | 201 practice questions | MSC-131 examcollection | 000-S32 bootcamp | HP3-024 study guide | JN0-662 braindumps | E20-597 dumps questions | 412-79 dump | E20-891 test prep | LEED-GA cram | 000-512 real questions |
Pass4sure USMLE Dumps and Practice Tests with Real Questions
killexams.com USMLE Certification study guides are setup by IT experts. Bunches of understudies have been whining that there are an excessive number of questions in such a significant number of training exams and study aid, and they are recently can not afford to manage the cost of any more. Seeing killexams.com specialists work out this far reaching rendition while still assurance that all the learning is secured after profound research and exam.
The best way to get success in the USMLE USMLE exam is that you ought to get dependable prep material. We guarantee that killexams.com is the most direct pathway towards USMLE United States Medical Licensing Examination exam. You will be triumphant with full surety. You can see free questions at killexams.com before you purchase the USMLE exam products. Our test questions are the same as actual test questions. The questions and answers collected by the certified professionals. They give you the experience of taking the real test. 100% assurance to pass the USMLE real test.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
killexams.com high quality USMLE exam simulator is very facilitating for our customers for the exam preparation. All important features, topics and definitions are highlighted in brain dumps pdf. Gathering the data in one place is a true time saver and helps you prepare for the IT certification exam within a short time span. The USMLE exam offers key points. The killexams.com pass4sure dumps helps to memorize the important features or concepts of the USMLE exam
At killexams.com, we provide thoroughly reviewed USMLE USMLE training resources which are the best for Passing USMLE test, and to get certified by USMLE. It is a best choice to accelerate your career as a professional in the Information Technology industry. We are proud of our reputation of helping people pass the USMLE test in their very first attempts. Our success rates in the past two years have been absolutely impressive, thanks to our happy customers who are now able to boost their career in the fast lane. killexams.com is the number one choice among IT professionals, especially the ones who are looking to climb up the hierarchy levels faster in their respective organizations. USMLE is the industry leader in information technology, and getting certified by them is a guaranteed way to succeed with IT careers. We help you do exactly that with our high quality USMLE USMLE training materials. USMLE USMLE is omnipresent all around the world, and the business and software solutions provided by them are being embraced by almost all the companies. They have helped in driving thousands of companies on the sure-shot path of success. Comprehensive knowledge of USMLE products are required to certify a very important qualification, and the professionals certified by them are highly valued in all organizations.
We provide real USMLE pdf exam questions and answers braindumps in two formats. Download PDF & Practice Tests. Pass USMLE USMLE real Exam quickly & easily. The USMLE braindumps PDF type is available for reading and printing. You can print more and practice many times. Our pass rate is high to 98.9% and the similarity percentage between our USMLE study guide and real exam is 90% based on our seven-year educating experience. Do you want achievements in the USMLE exam in just one try?
Cause all that matters here is passing the USMLE - United States Medical Licensing Examination exam. As all that you need is a high score of USMLE USMLE exam. The only one thing you need to do is downloading braindumps of USMLE exam study guides now. We will not let you down with our money-back guarantee. The professionals also keep pace with the most up-to-date exam in order to present with the the majority of updated materials. Three Months free access to be able to them through the date of buy. Every candidates may afford the USMLE exam dumps via killexams.com at a low price. Often there is a discount for anyone all.
In the presence of the authentic exam content of the brain dumps at killexams.com you can easily develop your niche. For the IT professionals, it is vital to enhance their skills according to their career requirement. We make it easy for our customers to take certification exam with the help of killexams.com verified and authentic exam material. For a bright future in the world of IT, our brain dumps are the best option.
A top dumps writing is a very important feature that makes it easy for you to take USMLE certifications. But USMLE braindumps PDF offers convenience for candidates. The IT certification is quite a difficult task if one does not find proper guidance in the form of authentic resource material. Thus, we have authentic and updated content for the preparation of certification exam.
It is very important to gather to the point material if one wants to save time. As you need lots of time to look for updated and authentic study material for taking the IT certification exam. If you find that at one place, what could be better than this? Its only killexams.com that has what you need. You can save time and stay away from hassle if you buy Adobe IT certification from our website.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
You should get the most updated USMLE USMLE Braindumps with the correct answers, which are prepared by killexams.com professionals, allowing the candidates to grasp knowledge about their USMLE exam course in the maximum, you will not find USMLE products of such quality anywhere in the market. Our USMLE USMLE Practice Dumps are given to candidates at performing 100% in their exam. Our USMLE USMLE exam dumps are latest in the market, giving you a chance to prepare for your USMLE exam in the right way.
Killexams HPE0-S22 study guide | Killexams HP2-E48 test prep | Killexams 1Z0-542 brain dumps | Killexams Rh202 exam prep | Killexams 70-767 questions answers | Killexams 1Z0-881 test prep | Killexams P2020-012 exam prep | Killexams HPE0-J80 free pdf | Killexams 650-377 study guide | Killexams CFE free pdf | Killexams 000-301 cheat sheets | Killexams 000-605 test prep | Killexams EE0-011 practice test | Killexams 000-176 questions and answers | Killexams 70-511-VB real questions | Killexams C5050-287 study guide | Killexams 1Z0-962 questions and answers | Killexams HP0-264 practice questions | Killexams 7003 sample test | Killexams HP3-X10 test questions |
Killexams 156-727.77 Practice Test | Killexams 000-150 free pdf | Killexams P2090-054 study guide | Killexams C2020-622 questions and answers | Killexams 000-120 dumps | Killexams BH0-009 VCE | Killexams 9A0-066 cram | Killexams HP5-H08D free pdf | Killexams 000-M07 real questions | Killexams 920-537 study guide | Killexams VCS-322 exam prep | Killexams A00-202 test prep | Killexams E20-593 braindumps | Killexams LOT-921 pdf download | Killexams HP0-738 examcollection | Killexams E20-920 free pdf download | Killexams 00M-608 practice test | Killexams C2020-701 practice questions | Killexams 000-426 brain dumps | Killexams HP0-M54 real questions |
Schools undergoing curricular reform are reconsidering the optimal timing of Step 1. This study provides a psychometric investigation of the impact on United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores of changing the timing of Step 1 from after completion of the basic science curricula to after core clerkships.
Data from four schools that recently moved the examination were analyzed in a pre–post format using examinee scores from three years before and after the change. The sample included scores from 2008 through 2016. Several confounders were addressed, including rising national scores and potential differences in cohort abilities using deviation scores and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores. A resampling procedure compared study schools’ score changes versus similar schools’ in the same time period.
The ANCOVA indicated postchange Step 1 scores were higher compared with prechange (adjusted difference = 2.67; 95% confidence interval: 1.50–3.83, P < .001; effect size = 0.14) after adjusting for MCAT scores and rising national averages. The average score increase in study schools was larger than changes seen in similar schools. Failure rates also decreased from 2.87% (n = 48) pre change to 0.39% (n = 6) post change (P < .001).
Results suggest moving Step 1 after core clerkships yielded a small increase in scores and a reduction in failure rates. Although these small increases are unlikely to represent meaningful knowledge gains, this demonstration of “noninferiority” may allow schools to implement significant curricular reforms.
D. Jurich is senior psychometrician, National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
M. Daniel is assistant dean for curriculum and associate professor, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8961-7119.
M. Paniagua is medical advisor, Test Development Services, National Board of Medical Examiners, and adjunct associate professor, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
A. Fleming is associate dean for medical student affairs and associate professor of pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
V. Harnik is associate dean for curriculum and associate professor, Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
A. Pock is associate dean for curriculum and associate professor of medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
A. Swan-Sein is director, Center for Education Research and Evaluation, and assistant professor of educational assessment, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
M.A. Barone is vice president of licensure, National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
S.A. Santen is senior associate dean of evaluation, assessment and scholarship of learning, and professor of emergency medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, and was previously assistant dean for educational research and quality improvement, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Funding/Support: The University of Michigan School of Medicine, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, and New York University School of Medicine have Accelerating Change in Medical Education grants from the American Medical Association. Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine receives funding from the American Medical Association for S.A. Santen’s consulting on the Accelerating Change in Medical Education grant.
Other disclosures: D. Jurich, M. Paniagua, and M.A. Barone work for the National Board of Medical Examiners, the organization that administers the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 examined in this study.
Ethical approval: This study was reviewed and determined to be exempt by the American Institutes for Research (project number EX00398; June 27, 2016).
Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of their universities, the National Board of Medical Examiners, the Department of Defense, the United States Air Force, or the United States Government.
Supplemental digital content for this article is available at http://links.lww.com/ACADMED/A600.
Correspondence should be addressed to Michelle Daniel, University of Michigan Medical School, 6123 Taubman Health Sciences Library, 1135 Catherine St., SPC 5726, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; telephone: (401) 525-0251; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; Twitter:@Emergdoc1975.
Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
DOWNERS GROVE, Ill., Apr 04, 2017 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Becker Professional Education, a global leader in professional education and part of DeVry Education Group, announced major new initiatives underway to enhance the USMLEpreparation course. By adding a new distinguished faculty member, creating a visa program for international students and launching an app to help students learn on the go, Becker is focused on providing students with easy access to top resources to power their success while preparing for every step of the USMLE.
Introducing New Faculty Member Dr. Charles Faselis
Becker Professional Education has named Dr. Charles Faselis as the Director of Clinical Skills and Training. Dr. Faselis is the Chief of Staff at the Washington D.C. Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Professor of Medicine at George Washington University School of Medicine. Prior to being appointed to the Chief of Staff at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dr. Faselis served as the Center’s Chairman of Medicine, Associate Chief of Medicine, the Program Director of the Internal Medicine Residency program and as the Associate Chief of Staff for Education and Academic Affairs.
Dr. Faselis received his medical degree from the University of Athens School of Medicine and completed his residency in Internal Medicine at Cook County Hospital and Medicine Fellowship at the University of North Carolina. He has authored more than 100 peer reviewed publications and two books in Internal Medicine and has received several distinguished teaching awards including Attending-of-the-Year, the Osler award, the Golden Apple award and the Sol Katz teacher-of-the-year award from the American College of Physicians.
Dr. Faselis is the author of our enhanced Step 2 CS program offering exam preparation in a two-part approach:
Becker Launches International Student Visa Program and Live Intensive Offering
Becker Professional Education is certified by the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) to host F-1 visa students for the USMLE program. Once accepted into the program, Becker will issue the Form I-20 allowing students to apply for the F-1 visa to enter and study in the United States. The program is for international students who are interested in obtaining a United States residency and who want to focus their studies on various foundations specific to the U.S. approach to medicine.
The curriculum includes an in-depth workshop with content regarding medical residency admission, American diversity and healthcare in the United States. The intention is to orient international students toward positive understanding of the United States and guide student outcomes toward improved residency success.
International students and graduates interested in taking Step 1 and Step 2 CK of the USMLE course in the United States can do so at Becker’s Dallas Intensive located in Addison, Texas, which is 14 miles north of downtown Dallas.
To learn more about international admissions and to begin the Form I-20 application, visit www.becker.com/usmle/courses/international-students-visa-immigration.
Becker USMLE GuideMD and QMD Native App
Becker’s flexible self-study tool GuideMD: Advanced Interactive Learning and QMD: Advanced USMLE Question Bank are now available for the student on the go on Android and iOS mobile devices.
GuideMD and QMD offer two advanced learning tools in one application: a guided exam preparation program and an advanced, clinically focused question bank. With this newly launched app students will be able to sync their progress seamlessly, and have the flexibility to access unique learning tools and features anywhere at any time, such as:
“Because of our dedicated, industry leading faculty members, ability to extend our offerings to international students and innovative approach to studying on-the-go we are confident that we provide our students with access to the best possible USMLE exam prep tools,” stated David Bartholomew, Vice President, Healthcare at Becker Professional Education. “Becker’s approach to exam prep is comprehensive, engaging and focused to ensure the student receives a continuously updated curriculum combined with innovative technology and a strong emphasis on understanding, retention, and clinical thinking.”
Becker Professional Education has helped nearly half a million people prepare to succeed on professional exams including the USMLE. To learn more about Becker Professional Education, visit www.becker.com.
About Becker Professional Education
Becker Professional Education, a part of DeVry Education Group DV, +5.26% is a global leader in professional education serving the accounting, project management and healthcare professions. Nearly half a million professionals have prepared to advance their careers through its CPA Exam Review, ACCA [®] Courses, CMA Exam Review, PMP [®] Exam Review, USMLE [® ] Review and Continuing Professional Education courses. Throughout its more than 60-year history, Becker has earned a strong track record of student success through world-class teaching, curriculum and learning tools that enable its students to develop the knowledge and performance skills necessary to stay ahead in an ever-changing business world. For more information about Becker Professional Education, visit www.becker.com.
USMLE® is a joint program of the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME). Test names and other trademarks are the property of the respective trademark holders. None of the trademark holders are endorsed, sponsor or support Becker Professional Education in any manner.
View source version on businesswire.com: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170404005202/en/
SOURCE: Becker Professional Education"> <Property FormalName="PrimaryTwitterHandle" Value="@BeckerUSMLEPrep
Becker Professional EducationConstantine Karampelas, (630) email@example.com
Copyright Business Wire 2017
DOWNERS GROVE, Ill.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Becker Professional Education, a global leader in professional education and part of Adtalem Global Education, announced two major new initiatives to expand beyond the current USMLE preparation course. Becker is collaborating with 4MedPlus to ensure that its students have easy access via a single tool to key certifications needed prior to the start of their medical programs. In addition, Becker is also adding a GuideRN Self Study to prep nursing students for the NCLEX-RN - the standardized exam required to become a board certified nurse.
New 4MedPlus Compliance iBookPlus+ Offering
The 4MedPlus Compliance iBookPlus+ is an online course tool which allows practitioners, employers, educators and organizations to deliver access to required and recommended compliance learning for staff, students and members with a single click. Compatible with PC, MAC/iPad and Android on all browsers, the iBookPlus+ features an online interactive educational hub where students can quickly establish proficiency in regulatory, compliance and security topics in healthcare all at once.
The six certificates of proficiency accessed by Becker students in the compliance iBookPlus+ include:
Completion of each course in the bundle achieves a 4MedApproved Certificate of Proficiency with Nursing CEU's, Physician CME and College Credit available. The iBookPlus+ tool also provides access to hundreds of individual modules and numerous additional courses for customized compliance. All PDF certificates are dispatched upon iBookPlus+ completion to students as well as to the administrator or distribution list associated with the account and a comprehensive admin panel is included which allows for monitoring and management of student progress.
Becker Launches New GuideRN, Self-Paced Learning Program, to Prep Nursing Students for NCLEX-RN
Becker Professional Education is launching a new GuideRN Self Study program to help nursing students prepare for their NCLEX test required to become a board certified nurse. Featuring 21 core subject topics, the GuideRN self study includes a full curriculum of nursing subjects to help students prepare for the NCLEX, including Nursing Sciences, Fundamental Skills, Professional Standards, and Examination Preparation.
In addition, the GuideRN tool offers more than 30 hours of modular online content grounded in the fundamentals of medicine, as well as full-color illustrations, photos and embedded animations to help bring medical topics to life and illustrate the processes of the human body. Also, the end of each chapter includes practice questions to enhance the understanding of specific nursing subjects and the user has the option to add more than 2,000 UWorld Question Bank questions providing detailed explanations that are written to simulate the NCLEX exam.
“Through our partnership with 4MedsPlus and our new GuideRN Self Study program, we are transforming the traditional learning process within key areas of medical study to provide interactive, advanced exam prep solutions that are easily accessible across devices,” stated David Bartholomew, Vice President, Healthcare at Becker Professional Education. “Becker’s focused growth plan will continue to provide our students with resources tailored for comprehensive understanding and access to the key information needed to succeed in a variety of areas of medical exam and certification prep.”
Becker Professional Education has helped nearly half a million people prepare to succeed on professional exams including the USMLE and now in both medical certifications and NCLEX. To learn more about Becker Professional Education, visit www.becker.com.
About Becker Professional Education
Becker Professional Education is a member of Adtalem Global Education (NYSE: ATGE), a global education provider headquartered in the United States. The organization's purpose is to empower students to achieve their goals, find success and make inspiring contributions to our global community. Becker is global leader in professional education serving the accounting, project management and healthcare professions. Nearly half a million professionals have prepared to advance their careers through its CPA Exam Review, ACCA® Courses, CMA Exam Review, PMP® Exam Review, USMLE® Review and Continuing Professional Education courses. Throughout its more than 60-year history, Becker has earned a strong track record of student success through world-class teaching, curriculum and learning tools that enable its students to develop the knowledge and performance skills necessary to stay ahead in an ever-changing business world. For more information about Becker Professional Education, visit www.becker.com.
About Adtalem Global Education
The purpose of Adtalem Global Education is to empower students to achieve their goals, find success and make inspiring contributions to our global community. Adtalem Global Education Inc. (NYSE: ATGE; member S&P MidCap 400 Index) is a leading global education provider, and the parent organization of Adtalem Educacional do Brasil, American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine, Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists, Becker Professional Education, Carrington College, Chamberlain University, DeVry University and its Keller Graduate School of Management, Ross University School of Medicine and Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine. For more information, please visit adtalem.com.
About the 4MedPlus Corporation
4MedPlus Corporation is the leading provider of accredited continuing education CME/CEU on topics relating to Health IT, compliance, security, regulatory requirements, government incentives, health and safety, and more. Healthcare professionals are able to meet their ongoing training needs entirely online on their own schedule, which encourages more efficient delivery of medical services and effective time management for better patient care. 4Med delivers their courses through an extensive network of educational catalog partnerships and via their own online training catalog system.
USMLE® is a joint program of the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME). Test names and other trademarks are the property of the respective trademark holders. None of the trademark holders are endorsed, sponsor or support Becker Professional Education in any manner.
NCLEX-RN® is a registered trademark of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing and this trademark owner does not sponsor, endorse or support Becker Professional Education in any manner.
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [14 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12868722
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12961737
Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2018/01/looking-for-usmle-exam-dumps-that-works.html
Wordpress : https://wp.me/p7SJ6L-2V9