|Exam Name||:||IBMSPSSSTATL1P - IBM SPSS Statistics Level 1|
|Questions and Answers||:||70 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||February 21, 2019|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||Pass4sure SPS-100 Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure SPS-100 Full Version|
Belive me or now not! This resource contemporary SPS-100 questions is real.
This is my first time that I took this company. I experience very assured in SPS-100 but. I prepare my SPS-100 the use of questions and solutions with exam simulator softare through killexams.com team.
put together SPS-100 Questions and answers in any other case Be organized to fail.
i am over the moon to mention that I passed the SPS-100 exam with 92% marks. killexams.com Questions & answers notes made the entire issue substantially easy and clean for me! maintain up the notable work. inside the wake of perusing your direction notes and a chunk of practice structure exam simulator, i used to be efficiently ready to pass the SPS-100 exam. clearly, your direction notes in reality supported up my actuality. a few topics like instructor conversation and Presentation abilties are achieved very nicely.
All actual test questions ultra-modern SPS-100 examination! Are you kidding?
killexams.com gave me an wonderful education tool. I used it for my SPS-100 exam and had been given a most score. I surely just like the way killexams.com does their exam training. Basically, that may be a sell off, so that you get questions which may be used at the real SPS-100 exams. But the trying out engine and the exercise exam format help you memorize all of it very well, so you become studying subjects, and may be able to draw upon this information in the destiny. Terrific pleasant, and the finding out engine is very mild and consumer quality. I didnt come upon any troubles, so this is tremendous cost for cash.
birthday celebration is over! Time to observe and bypass the exam.
I am no longer a fan of on-line braindumps, due to the fact they may be often posted via irresponsible oldsters thatmisinform you into gaining knowledge of belongings you dont want and lacking subjects that you really want to understand. Not killexams.com. This agency affords truly valid questions answers that help you get via your exam schooling. That is how I passed SPS-100 exam. First time, First I trusted loose on line stuff and i failed. I were given killexams.com SPS-100 exam simulator - and that i passed. That is the most effective evidence I want. Thanks killexams.com crew.
Belive me or not! This resource of SPS-100 questions is authentic.
killexams.com simply you are most remarkable mentor ever, the manner you teach or manual is unmatchable with some other carrier. I got notable help from you in my try to strive SPS-100. I was not high quality about my achievement however you made it in fine 2 weeks thats clearly wonderful. I am very thankful to you for presenting such rich help that these days i have been capable of score outstanding grade in SPS-100 exam. If i am a hit in my discipline its because of you.
it is extraordinary! I got dumps present day SPS-100 examination.
some suitable guys cant carry an alteration to the worlds way but they can best tell you whether or not you have been the handiest man who knew a way to do that and that i need to be regarded in this global and make my very own mark and i have been so lame my whole way but I recognise now that I wanted to get a pass in my SPS-100 and this can make me famous maybe and sure im brief of glory but passing my A+ exams with killexams.com became my morning and night time glory.
it's miles amazing perfect to prepare SPS-100 examination with dumps.
Hearty way to killexams.com team for the question & solution of SPS-100 exam. It provided brilliant option to my questions on SPS-100 I felt confident to stand the test. Observed many questions inside the exam paper a great deal likethe manual. I strongly experience that the manual remains valid. Respect the try with the aid of using your team individuals, killexams.com. The gadget of dealing topics in a very specific and uncommon manner is terrific. Wish you people create more such test publications in close to destiny for our comfort.
Belive me or now not! This resource of SPS-100 questions works.
To ensure the success in the SPS-100 exam, I sought assistance from the killexams.com. I chose it for several reasons: their analysis on the SPS-100 exam concepts and rules was excellent, the material is really user friendly, super nice and very resourceful. Most importantly, Dumps removed all the problems on the related topics. Your material provided generous contribution to my preparation and enabled me to succeed. I can firmly state that it helped me achieve my success.
Use real SPS-100 dumps with right quality and recognition.
I passed the SPS-100 exam with this package deal from Killexams. I am not certain I would have executed it without it! The element is, it covers a massive range of subjects, and if you prepare for the exam to your own, with out a confirmed strategy, possibilities are that a few things can fall via the cracks. These are only some regions killexams.com has clearly helped me with there may be just an excessive amount of information! killexams.com covers the entirety, and given that they use actual exam questions passing the SPS-100 with much less pressure is lots less difficult.
real SPS-100 test questions! i used to be now not waiting for such shortcut.
I was about to give up exam SPS-100 because I wasnt confident in whether I would pass or not. With just a week remaining I decided to switch to killexams.com Q&A for my exam preparation. Never thought that the topics that I had always run away from would be so much fun to study; its easy and short way of getting to the points made my preparation lot easier. All thanks to killexams.com Q&A, I never thought I would pass my exam but I did pass with flying colors.
IBM tops the list of companies within the predictive analytics software area in line with a quadrant lately launched via 360Quadrants, adopted closely by using Oracle and SAP SE. IBM’s SPSS Modeler was rated the surest in product pleasant, reliability, and breadth and depth of offering. IBM SPSS Modeler additionally captured the top spot in standards like geographic footprint and viability of business.
360Quadrants defines predictive analytics as a statistical and facts mining answer consisting of numerous algorithms and methodologies used for structured in addition to unstructured information to extract enterprise insights.
360Quadrants covers 50+ products in the predictive analytics house and locations the appropriate 31 of them in a quadrant reckoning on their satisfactory, reliability, and business effect. These 31 products are categorised into Visionary Leaders, Dynamic Differentiators, emerging businesses, and Innovators.
360Quadrants acknowledges IBM Corp, SAS Institute, Inc., SAP SE, fair Issac service provider (FICO), Tableau utility, Inc., RapidMiner, Inc., Oracle Corp, and Angoss software Corp as Visionary Leaders; TIBCO utility, Inc., Microstrategy, Inc., Alteryx, Inc., assistance Builder, Dataiku, KNIME.COM AG, and NTT facts service provider, as Innovators; GoodData agency, Microsoft enterprise, Teradata business enterprise, Sisense, Inc., Predixion application, and Domino information Lab, Inc. as Dynamic Differentiators; and Exago, included, AgilOne, QlikTech overseas, and Kognitio Ltd. as rising gamers.
the first commercially attainable optical biometer become the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), which was delivered in 1999. It became greatly adopted as the gold common for intraocular lens alternative on the time of cataract surgery.1 it's in line with partial coherence interferometry (PCI). decent precision of the gadget has been pronounced, however the failure expense for axial size size is about 17.5% to 37.eighty four%.1–5 Optical low coherence reflectometry and optical low coherence interferometry have become accessible in more fresh years, and maybe function greater in terms of acquisition of axial length measurements in denser cataracts than the PCI-based mostly IOLMaster.
however optical biometers deliver additional measurements akin to keratometry and supply higher resolution than ultrasound, their software is restricted because of the penetration of easy. better failure prices occur with corneal scars, dense cataracts, and vitreous hemorrhage. Some new algorithms have been utilized to increase the signal-to-noise ratio, akin to a series of consecutive measurements.6 Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) is a comparatively new technique of Fourier area OCT enabling stronger penetration. Three contraptions have turn into purchasable using this expertise: the IOL-master seven hundred (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG), the OA-2000 (Tomey, Nagoya, Japan), and the Argos (Movu Inc., Komaki, Japan).7–10 To our advantage, there was no assessment of those SS-OCT biometers or an evaluation of their repeatability and contract.
The purpose of the existing look at turned into to compare the IOLMaster seven-hundred, the OA-2000, and the Argos to a PCI-based mostly biometer (the IOLMaster v5.4) for axial size size failure fees in sufferers with cataract. furthermore, the present examine sought to prospectively examine the repeatability of the three SS-OCT biometers in evaluation to the PCI-based mostly IOLMaster v5.4 and the settlement between all gadgets.sufferers and MethodsPatients
This prospective look at enrolled 119 patients (171 eyes) with cataract who were as a result of undergo cataract surgery on the Eye medical institution of Wenzhou scientific institution, Wenzhou, China. The purpose of the examine become totally defined and all participants signed written advised consent. The look at become authorised with the aid of the Board of Wenzhou scientific school in keeping with the tenets of the announcement of Helsinki. All contributors underwent complete ophthalmic examinations that mainly consisted of subjective refraction, noncontact tonometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and ophthalmoscopy. The inclusion criterion turned into adult sufferers with unilateral or bilateral cataract. The exclusion criteria had been: fresh heritage of ocular trauma, extreme corneal or vitreous opacities, significant retinal disease, severe systemic ailment, nystagmus, or inadequate potential to agree to testing.
Following student dilation with 0.5% tropicamide and zero.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride (Mydrin-P; Santen Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan), each affected person turned into examined on a slit-lamp biomicroscope and the severity of cataract graded in response to the Lens Opacities Classification device (LOCS) III.eleven The LOCS III incorporates different slit-lamp photographs for grading nuclear colour, nuclear opalescence, cortical cataract, and posterior subcapsular cataract on a decimal scale. the size levels from 0.1 to 5.9 for grading cortical cataract or posterior subcapsular cataract and from 0.1 to 6.9 for nuclear color or nuclear opalescence. greater scores point out stronger severity.gadgets and methods
Axial size values had been measured following pupil dilation via the 4 different biometers through the same experienced operator (YL). The order through which the biometers were used became randomized. All measurements had been taken within the shortest time length viable and measurements were captured between the times 10:00 and 17:00.
The OA-2000 is a biometer in line with Fourier area expertise via light interference the usage of a swept-supply laser with a wavelength of 1,060 nm.12,13 The OA-2000 performs B-scans for measuring the ocular parameters to discover the clearest a part of the lens automatically. When blinks are detected, the OA-2000 eliminates the unsuitable records and retakes the photograph immediately. The IOLMaster seven-hundred accommodates SS-OCT and a multi-dot keratometer.14 The laser used is a vertical cavity floor-emitting laser with an extended coherence wavelength of 1,055 nm. The machine offers a 1-mm horizontal OCT scan of the retina to ensure that the measurements are on the visible axis by using the presence of the foveal pit. The Argos SS-OCT makes use of a 1,060-nm wavelength and 20-nm bandwidth swept-supply know-how to assemble a two-dimensional OCT scan of the eye.7 The Argos displays whole eye true time OCT all over alignment to be certain a hit measurement. The IOLMaster v5.four uses PCI to measure axial length.1,15 It uses a laser diode emitting a 780-nm infrared beam of brief-coherent light.
The composite-20 formulation turned into used within the latest look at, which has been shown to deliver more constant success for axial size measurement than the typical or typical composite-5 method. With the OA-2000, IOLMaster seven-hundred, and Argos, at the least three official measurements have been recorded in keeping with the manufacturer's guidelines.Statistical evaluation
Statistical analysis became carried out the usage of SPSS for windows utility (version 21.0; IBM enterprise, Armonk, big apple) and MedCalc Statistical utility (edition 13.0; MedCalc utility, Inc., Mariakerke, Belgium). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov verify became used to determine that the information had been normally dispensed (P > .05).
The consequences had been calculated for three measurements and presented as the imply ± standard deviation. Logistic regression evaluation changed into used to verify the association between cataract class and severity with acquisition expense. Chi-square analysis changed into used to verify even if statistically massive adjustments in success rates had been found between the biometers. within-subject typical deviation (Sw), look at various–retest repeatability (TRT), coefficient of adaptation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the three measurements to verify the intraobserver repeatability.sixteen,17 The TRT described as 2.seventy seven Sw suggests the interval inside which ninety five% of the modifications between measurements are expected to lie.18 The CoV turned into calculated as the ratio of the Sw to the suggest (the reliability turned into enhanced with lessen values). The ICC ranging from 0 to 1 is often categorised as follows: an ICC below 0.seventy five indicates a negative correlation, whereas an ICC enhanced than 0.ninety indicates a high correlation.19,20 For agreement assessment, paired t exams and Bland–Altman plots were carried out and ninety five% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated.21 Narrower 95% LoA point out higher agreement. P values below .05 had been considered statistically colossal.outcomes
one hundred nineteen patients had been enrolled and 171 eyes have been measured in total. The suggest age of patients turned into sixty eight.87 ± 9.82 years (range: 38 to 88 years). From the 171 eyes, the measurement success rate become 166 eyes (97.08%) with the IOLMaster seven hundred, 166 eyes (97.08%) with the OA-2000, 170 eyes (99.42%) with the Argos, and 138 eyes (eighty.70%) with the IOLMaster v5.four. The consequences of LOCS III classification are proven in table A (available within the online version of this article). Logistic regression evaluation become applied for the association between cataract category and severity with acquisition expense (desk B, purchasable within the online edition of this text). The evaluation showed no affiliation with cortical, nuclear, or posterior subcapsular cataract with the acquisition fee of axial length measurements with most biometers, but a statistically colossal association for posterior subcapsular cataract with the IOLMaster 700 (β = −1.one hundred fifteen, P = .042) and the IOLMaster v5.4 (β = −2.139, P < .001). improved severity of posterior subcapsular cataract changed into linked to a more robust axial size measurement failure fee. McNemar's exams were used to determine even if statistically large modifications in success quotes were found between the 4 biometers with chi-rectangular analysis (desk C, attainable in the online edition of this text). The results indicated giant ameliorations in axial size measurement success prices between the IOLMaster 700 vs IOLMaster v5.four, OA-2000 vs IOLMaster v5.four, and Argos vs IOLMaster v5.4 (P < .001). No statistically enormous modifications had been discovered between the three SS-OCT biometers.
category and Severity of Cataracts in line with Lens Opacities Classification equipment (LOCS) III
Logistic Regression evaluation Assessing the affiliation Between Cataract class and Severity With Acquisition cost
changes in Success rates Between the SS-OCT Biometers
The intraobserver repeatability consequences of all patients effectively measured with the IOLMaster seven hundred, OA-2000, and Argos are displayed in desk 1. all the SS-OCT biometers confirmed excessive repeatability with low TRT (0.03, 0.06, and 0.05 mm, respectively), low CoV (0.04%, 0.10%, and 0.07%, respectively), and excessive ICC values (1.000, 0.999, and 1.000, respectively).
Intraobserver Repeatability results for Axial size Measurements
except for the failed measurements, 138 eyes have been effectively measured with the aid of all 4 biometers and the effects are proven in table 2. The IOLMaster seven hundred, OA-2000, and Argos confirmed equivalent miraculous repeatability. the bland–Altman evaluation and LoA (Figures A–D, purchasable within the online edition of this text) indicated astounding settlement among the three SS-OCT–primarily based biometers and the IOLMaster v5.four, with ninety five% LoA as slender as 0.09 mm (desk 3).
Intraobserver Repeatability outcomes for usual Axial length Measurements (N = 138)
Bland–Altman plots of agreement in axial length dimension between the IOLMaster seven hundred and OA-2000. The solid line suggests the imply change (bias). The upper and decrease strains symbolize the 95% limits of contract (figure A indicates the imply results of all sufferers correctly measured, determine B suggests the suggest effects of patients successfully measured with all four biometers). The IOLMaster is manufactured by means of Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany; and the OA-2000 is manufactured through Tomey, Nagoya, Japan. SD = typical deviation
Bland–Altman plots of settlement in axial length measurement between the IOLMaster seven-hundred and Argos. The strong line shows the suggest change (bias). The higher and decrease strains signify the ninety five% limits of contract (determine A shows the mean results of all patients successfully measured, figure B suggests the suggest outcomes of patients correctly measured with all four biometers). The IOLMaster is manufactured by means of Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany; and the Argos is manufactured by way of Movu Inc., Komaki, Japan. SD = commonplace deviation
Bland–Altman plots of settlement in axial length size between the OA-2000 and Argos. The solid line suggests the imply difference (bias). The higher and reduce strains characterize the ninety five% limits of contract (figure A indicates the mean effects of all patients efficaciously measured, figure B suggests the suggest effects of sufferers correctly measured with all four biometers). The OA-2000 is manufactured by using Tomey, Nagoya, Japan; and the Argos is manufactured by Movu Inc., Komaki, Japan. SD = ordinary deviation
Bland–Altman plots of settlement in axial size size among the IOLMaster seven-hundred, OA-2000, Argos, and IOLMaster v5.four. The solid line shows the mean change (bias). The higher and decrease strains characterize the 95% limits of agreement (determine A suggests the settlement between the IOLMaster seven-hundred and IOLMaster v5.4, figure B shows the settlement between the OA-2000 and IOLMaster v5.4, and determine C shows the settlement between the Argos and IOLMaster v5.4). The IOLMaster is manufactured by way of Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany; the OA-2000 is manufactured with the aid of Tomey, Nagoya, Japan; and the Argos is manufactured by way of Movu Inc., Komaki, Japan. SD = ordinary deviation
Axial length ameliorations Between contraptionsdialogue
Axial size is an quintessential dimension for cataract surgical procedure, with 54% of the refractive error in intraocular lens power calculation as a result of axial size.22,23 A 1-mm axial size error can lead to a refractive error of about 2.70 to three.00 diopters (D).6,24 The knowledge of optical biometers is their excessive resolution in evaluation to ultrasound, but they depend on the media transparency.1,25
within the present look at, the failure price of measurement of axial size with the PCI-based mostly IOLMaster v5.4 became 19.30%. this is comparable to outdated reviews showing a failure rate of 17.5% to 37.84%.2–four The SS-OCT–based IOLMaster seven hundred, OA-2000, and Argos showed lots reduce failure quotes of 2.92%, 2.92%, and 0.fifty eight%, respectively. This difference between the SS-OCT–based mostly biometers and the PCI-primarily based IOLMaster v5.four became statistically colossal (all P < .001 with chi-square evaluation), however there were no statistically massive alterations among the three SS-OCT biometers, indicating the performance and penetration turned into similar. Akman et al.14 stated the success price of axial length dimension with the IOLMaster seven hundred changed into 100% and the PCI-primarily based IOLMaster-500 failed in 17 instances from 188 eyes. In a previous analyze of ours,three the success price of the OA-2000 and IOLMaster v5.4 was 100% and sixty three.ninety three%, respectively. The IOLMaster v5.4 is in response to the PCI precept with a wavelength of 780 nm, whereas the IOLMaster seven hundred uses a swept-supply easy with a wavelength varying from 1,035 to 1,095 nm. A swept-supply light of 1,060 nm is used within the OA-2000 and the Argos. therefore, we accept as true with an extended wavelength of light and improvement of approach might also aid to enhance the success fee for axial size measurements.
The diploma of lens opacification in a cataractous lens is not all the time uniform. according to the logistic regression analysis of the current look at, cortical and nuclear lens opacities had no tremendous influence on the failure of axial length measurements with any of the 4 biometers. despite the fact, posterior subcapsular opacity was the leading culprit inflicting acquisition failure with the PCI-primarily based IOLMaster v5.four. Posterior subcapsular opacities continually trigger more visual impairment and affect distinction sensitivity even at an early stage.26–28 The reason is likely as a result of the incontrovertible fact that posterior subcapsular opacities are nearer to the nodal aspect and with better density, which may impact the propagation of easy. In outdated reports evaluating the PCI-based mostly IOLMaster with different biometers, a statistically tremendous vogue of better failure rates with expanding severity of posterior subcapsular cataracts has been discovered.2,three,29
To reap authentic axial length values, fixation is crucial all the way through measurement. When measuring with ultrasound, it is difficult to attain measurements with recognize to the fovea. The PCI-based mostly IOLMaster v5.four and the SS-OCT–based mostly OA-2000 give a fixation mild for the patient, however will also be tricky to profit repeatable measurements for those with bad visible acuity. In a old analyze comparing the PCI-primarily based IOLMaster and the SS-OCT–primarily based IOLMaster seven hundred, 19.6% nevertheless showed fixation loss.9 The IOLMaster seven hundred and the Argos supply an additional image of the complete eye in a longitudinal part, allowing the observer to make sure that the anteroposterior axis falls at once on the fovea.
The outcomes of the three SS-OCT biometers showed excessive repeatability with low Sw, low TRT, low CoV, and high ICC. With reanalysis of the 138 eyes measured with the aid of all 4 biometers, the repeatability turned into encouraging. The repeatability of the IOLMaster seven-hundred within the present study became comparable to that in the look at through Kunert et al.,30 who stated a TRT of 0.025 mm and a CoV of 0.03%. As in the present study, the OA-2000 has validated excessive repeatability in a number of articles with the TRT varying from 0.04 to 0.07 mm, CoV values various from 0.06 to 0.10, and ICC values close to 1.000.12,13 The excellent repeatability of those SS-OCT–based biometers is encouraging.
As part of the assessment of any new device, it is crucial to examine settlement among an identical contraptions.31,32 as the results exhibit in table 6 and in the figures, the imply change among the 4 biometers changed into near 0 mm with out statistical importance. Yang et al.9 discovered that in patients with myopia and an axial size of 27 mm, the suggest difference between IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster v5.4 became greater, specially for these with posterior staphyloma (imply change of 0.095 ± 0.182 mm, range: −0.eleven to 1.forty eight mm, P < .001). In our previous study evaluating the OA-2000 and the IOLMaster v5.four, the ninety five% LoA latitude become −0.05 to 0.07 mm, which is comparable to the present study.13 The 95% LoA latitude between the Argos and IOLMaster v5.four in the current study changed into a bit narrower than that pronounced through Shammas et al.7 The stages of 95% LoA for the three SS-OCTs had been no more than 0.09 mm, indicating their brilliant settlement. although, the IOLMaster 700 and the Argos have an further characteristic of offering SS-OCT imaging all through size. whether it helps to improve the accuracy in specific patients corresponding to these with excessive myopia requires additional evaluation.
These SS-OCT–based biometers have confirmed superiority in terms of the acquisition expense of axial size measurements in assessment to the PCI-primarily based IOLMaster v5.4. moreover, their measurements are also in agreement, indicating they can be used interchangeably. This has the most important abilities of cutting back the need for much less accurate ultrasound-based mostly axial length measurements. These findings imply a paradigm shift in optical biometry in that SS-OCT–primarily based biometers are prone to become the gold common.References
Intraobserver Repeatability effects for Axial size MeasurementsDeviceEyes (n)suggest ± SD (mm)SwTRTCOV (%)ICC (ninety five% CI)IOLMaster 70016623.24 ± 1.020.010.030.041.000 (1.000 to 1.000)OA-200016623.22 ± 1.010.020.060.100.999 (0.999 to 1.000)Argos17023.22 ± 0.990.020.050.071.000 (1.000 to 1.000)desk 2
Intraobserver Repeatability consequences for normal Axial size Measurements (N = 138)DeviceMean ± SD (mm)SwTRTCOV (%)ICC (ninety five% CI)IOLMaster 70023.26 ± 1.070.010.030.041.000 (1.000 to 1.000)OA-200023.25 ± 1.060.020.060.091.000 (0.999 to 1.000)Argos23.26 ± 1.040.020.050.071.000 (1.000 to 1.000)desk 3
Axial length differences Between contraptionsdevice PairingsMean ± SD (mm)P95% LoAIOLMaster seven hundred vs OA-2000.01 ± 0.03.048−0.05 to 0.06IOLMaster seven-hundred vs Argos0.00 ± 0.041.000−0.08 to 0.09OA-2000 vs Argos0.00 ± 0.041.000−0.09 to 0.08IOLMaster seven hundred vs IOLMaster v5.40.00 ± 0.031.000−0.05 to 0.06OA-2000 vs IOLMaster v5.40.00 ± 0.04.649−0.07 to 0.06Argos vs IOLMaster v5.forty.00 ± 0.041.000−0.09 to 0.09Table A
class and Severity of Cataracts in keeping with Lens Opacities Classification gadget (LOCS) IIIScoreCorticalNuclear ColorPosterior Subcapsular⩾ 2.584271042.5 to 3.54483413.6 to four.5304884.6 to 5.510108> 5.5315Table B
Logistic Regression evaluation Assessing the affiliation Between Cataract class and Severity With Acquisition expenseDeviceCorticalNuclear ColorPosterior SubcapsularIOLMaster 700 β−2.905−0.076−1.115 P.138.915.042OA-2000 β−1.773−0.617−0.622 P.294.395.185Argos β−33.53919.375−fifty nine.163 P.992.992.977IOLMaster v5.4 β−1.842−0.497−2.139 P.379.089< .001Table C
changes in Success quotes Between the SS-OCT BiometersaDeviceOA-2000ArgosIOLMaster v5.4IOLMaster 7001.000.a hundred twenty five< .001OA-2000–.125< .001Argos––< .001
IBM is purchasing analytics utility and options issuer SPSS in an all cash transaction at a cost of $50/share – a forty two % premium to Monday’s closing fee of $35.09 on Nasdaq – leading to a complete cash consideration in the merger of approximately $1.2 billion. The acquisition is discipline to SPSS shareholder approval, regulatory clearances and different closing situations, and is anticipated to close later within the 2d half of 2009.
large Blue referred to the acquisition of the publicly-held Chicago company became expected to reinforce its advice-agenda initiative, which helps agencies take assistance and switch it right into a strategic asset. IBM shares fell sixty seven cent to $116.ninety six in pre-market buying and selling, whereas SPSS shares jumped 41 percent to $49.59.
A message from SPSS Chairman, CEO & President Jack Noonan:
We and IBM view this as a enormously-complementary flow from both a know-how and a market position standpoint.
We’re enthusiastic about this agreement and the positive potentialities that SPSS and IBM can achieve collectively in continuing to lead an trade that we helped form. The depth and breadth of IBM’s resources, its consumer and market reach can most effective raise our ability to handle the becoming marketplace for Predictive Analytics.
In joining with IBM, we will develop Predictive Analytics as a competitive capabilities for companies and corporations global. We see this as a transformative adventure that will accelerate the adoption of Predictive Analytics.
Between now and the acquisition shut, we will continue to help our shoppers and companions in typical trend. latest contracts will stay in impact, account relationships and support infrastructure will stay unchanged.
Predictive analytics application captures and analyzes statistics about people’s attributes, attitudes and behaviors to profit a full figuring out of anticipated future behaviors, so businesses can make smarter selections for greater business outcomes.
IBM says it is going to proceed to help and boost SPSS technologies while enabling shoppers to take competencies of its own product portfolio. SPSS will become a part of the guidance management division inside the software community business unit, led through Ambuj Goyal, regularly occurring manager, IBM suggestions administration.
update – In other news: IBM additionally acquired Ounce Labs, a provider of enterprise supply code protection checking out and intends to combine it into its Rational software company. fiscal phrases were no longer disclosed.
Unquestionably it is hard assignment to pick dependable certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals get sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report dissension customers come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams joyfully and effortlessly. We never trade off on our review, reputation and quality on the grounds that killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is imperative to us. Uniquely we deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report objection, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you see any false report posted by our rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protest or something like this, simply remember there are constantly awful individuals harming reputation of good administrations because of their advantages. There are a huge number of fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our specimen questions and test brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
CDM practice questions | A2150-195 mock exam | 6203-1 study guide | C2040-414 VCE | IC3-3 examcollection | C2020-635 study guide | S90-20A practice test | HP0-704 test prep | MOS-E2K test questions | 2B0-101 braindumps | PEGACSA71V1 dump | HP0-733 brain dumps | HP2-Z37 dumps | HP2-K40 test prep | 4A0-100 real questions | 310-052 bootcamp | 000-229 free pdf | MB4-219 exam prep | H12-221 practice test | HP2-T17 cram |
Passing the SPS-100 exam is simple with killexams.com
killexams.com helps a great many competitors pass the exams and get their confirmations. We have a great many effective audits. Our dumps are solid, reasonable, refreshed and of really best quality to beat the challenges of any IT confirmations. killexams.com exam dumps are latest refreshed in profoundly outflank way on customary premise and material is discharged occasionally. SPS-100 real questions are our quality tested.
The quality way to get success in the IBM SPS-100 exam is which you should get dependable braindumps. We guarantee that killexams.com is the most direct pathway towards IBM IBMSPSSSTATL1P - IBM SPSS Statistics Level 1 exam. You may be effective with full fact. You can see loose questions at killexams.com earlier than you purchase the SPS-100 exam objects. Our brain dumps are in one of a kind choice the same as the actual exam design. The questions and answers made via the certified professionals. They come up with the revel in of taking the actual exam. A hundred% guarantee to pass the SPS-100 real exam.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as beneath;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on internet site
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $ninety nine
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
High Quality SPS-100 products: we have our experts Team to ensure our IBM SPS-100 exam questions are always the latest. They are all very familiar with the exams and testing center.
How we keep IBM SPS-100 exams updated?: we have our special ways to know the latest exams information on IBM SPS-100. Sometimes we contact our partners who are very familiar with the testing center or sometimes our customers will email us the most recent feedback, or we got the latest feedback from our dumps market. Once we find the IBM SPS-100 exams changed then we update them ASAP.
Money back guarantee?: if you really fail this SPS-100 IBMSPSSSTATL1P - IBM SPSS Statistics Level 1 and don’t want to wait for the update then we can give you full refund. But you should send your score report to us so that we can have a check. We will give you full refund immediately during our working time after we get the IBM SPS-100 score report from you.
IBM SPS-100 IBMSPSSSTATL1P - IBM SPSS Statistics Level 1 Product Demo?: we have both PDF version and Software version. You can check our software page to see how it looks like.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
When will I get my SPS-100 material after I pay?: Generally, After successful payment your username/password are sent at your email address within 5 min. But if there is any delay in bank side for payment authorization, then it takes little longer.
Killexams LOT-406 braindumps | Killexams 1Z0-588 braindumps | Killexams NS0-510 braindumps | Killexams 7003-1 free pdf | Killexams 00M-233 VCE | Killexams 000-538 Practice Test | Killexams C2090-102 cram | Killexams HP0-Y16 mock exam | Killexams 156-815-70 cheat sheets | Killexams E20-060 brain dumps | Killexams A8 test questions | Killexams BI0-145 real questions | Killexams ST0-304 practice test | Killexams QIA practice test | Killexams 000-M249 study guide | Killexams 4A0-110 dump | Killexams 70-735 free pdf download | Killexams 250-316 free pdf | Killexams P2050-004 exam questions | Killexams HP2-N40 brain dumps |
Killexams 9A0-054 practice questions | Killexams 70-516-CSharp dump | Killexams HP2-B40 exam questions | Killexams 9L0-518 dumps questions | Killexams 000-M64 study guide | Killexams HP0-S42 practice test | Killexams HP2-K35 practice test | Killexams C2090-543 sample test | Killexams 1Z0-325 VCE | Killexams HH0-270 questions and answers | Killexams HP0-781 test prep | Killexams HP2-Z07 pdf download | Killexams ICDL-WINDOWS braindumps | Killexams SD0-302 free pdf | Killexams 190-835 test prep | Killexams CPAT study guide | Killexams HP2-K08 Practice test | Killexams BCP-420 real questions | Killexams E20-593 practice exam | Killexams 4A0-110 braindumps |
Global Initiative for Asthma. 2017 GINA Report, Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/wms-GINA-2017-main-report-tracked-changes-for-archive.pdf (2018).
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Report No. 3, NIH Publication Number 08-5846 (NIH, Bethesda, 2007).
Barnes, P. J., Pedersen, S. & Busse, W. W. Efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids. New developments. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 157, S1–53 (1998).
Suissa, S., Ernst, P., Benayoun, S., Baltzan, M. & Cai, B. Low-dose inhaled corticosteroids and the prevention of death from asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 332–336 (2000).
Williams, L. K. et al. Quantifying the proportion of severe asthma exacerbations attributable to inhaled corticosteroid nonadherence. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 128, 1185–1191 (2011). e1182.
Dekhuijzen, P. N. R. et al. Incidence of oral thrush in patients with COPD prescribed inhaled corticosteroids: effect of drug, dose, and device. Respir. Med. 120, 54–63 (2016).
Dubus, J. C. et al. Local side-effects of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic children: influence of drug, dose, age, and device. Allergy 56, 944–948 (2001).
Lipworth, B. J. Systemic adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroid therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Intern. Med. 159, 941–955 (1999).
Pinto, C. R. et al. Local adverse effects associated with the use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with moderate or severe asthma. J. Bras. Pneumol. 39, 409–417 (2013).
Richter, K., Kanniess, F., Biberger, C., Nave, R. & Magnussen, H. Comparison of the oropharyngeal deposition of inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 45, 146–152 (2005).
Buhl, R. Local oropharyngeal side effects of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma. Allergy 61, 518–526 (2006).
Foster, J. M. et al. Higher patient perceived side effects related to higher daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids in the community: a cross-sectional analysis. Respir. Med. 100, 1318–1336 (2006).
Roland, N. J., Bhalla, R. K. & Earis, J. The local side effects of inhaled corticosteroids: current understanding and review of the literature. Chest 126, 213–219 (2004).
Powell, H. & Gibson, P. G. Inhaled corticosteroid doses in asthma: an evidence-based approach. Med J. Aust. 178, 223–225 (2003).
Price, D. et al. Real-life comparison of beclometasone dipropionate as an extrafine- or larger-particle formulation for asthma. Respir. Med. 107, 987–1000 (2013).
Amar, N. J., Moss, M. H., Kerwin, E. M., Li, J. & Small, C. J. Safety and efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate delivered by breath-actuated or metered-dose inhaler for persistent asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 37, 359–369 (2016).
Smith, M. J. & Hodson, M. E. Twice daily beclomethasone dipropionate administered with a concentrated aerosol inhaler: efficacy and patient compliance. Thorax 41, 960–963 (1986).
Shaw, N. J. & Edmunds, A. T. Inhaled beclomethasone and oral candidiasis. Arch. Dis. Child 61, 788–790 (1986).
Vandewalker, M., Hickey, L. & Small, C. J. Efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate breath-actuated or metered-dose inhaler in pediatric patients with asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 38, 354–364 (2017).
Ellepola, A. N. & Samaranayake, L. P. Inhalational and topical steroids, and oral candidosis: a mini review. Oral. Dis. 7, 211–216 (2001).
Knight, L. & Fletcher, J. Growth of Candida albicans in saliva: stimulation by glucose associated with antibiotics, corticosteroids, and diabetes mellitus. J. Infect. Dis. 123, 371–377 (1971).
Fukushima, C. et al. Oral candidiasis associated with inhaled corticosteroid use: comparison of fluticasone and beclomethasone. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 90, 646–651 (2003).
Rachelefsky, G. S., Liao, Y. & Faruqi, R. Impact of inhaled corticosteroid-induced oropharyngeal adverse events: results from a meta-analysis. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 98, 225–238 (2007).
van Boven, J. F., de Jong-van den Berg, L. T. & Vegter, S. Inhaled corticosteroids and the occurrence of oral candidiasis: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Drug Saf. 36, 231–236 (2013).
Toogood, J. H., Jennings, B., Greenway, R. W. & Chuang, L. Candidiasis and dysphonia complicating beclomethasone treatment of asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 65, 145–153 (1980).
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Asthma. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs25/chapter/Quality-statements (2017).
Dolovich, D. Corr, McCormack, M., Ruffin, R., Obminski, G. & Newhouse, M. Design and characteristics of a portable breath actuated, particle size selective medical aerosol inhaler. J. Aerosol Sci. 13, 1–7 (1982).
Dolovich, M. B. et al. Device selection and outcomes of aerosol therapy: evidence-based guidelines: American College of Chest Physicians/American College of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology. Chest 127, 335–371 (2005).
Laube, B. L. et al. What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies. Eur. Respir. J. 37, 1308–1331 (2011).
Salzman, G. A. & Pyszczynski, D. R. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients treated with beclomethasone dipropionate delivered by metered-dose inhaler alone and with Aerochamber. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 81, 424–428 (1988).
Toogood, J. H., Baskerville, J., Jennings, B., Lefcoe, N. M. & Johansson, S. A. Use of spacers to facilitate inhaled corticosteroid treatment of asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 129, 723–729 (1984).
Emc+. Clenil Modulite 50, 100, 200, 250 micrograms inhaler. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/21018 (2017).
Yau, W. et al. Examining licensed and unlicensed spacer use with nonextrafine beclometasone dipropionate treatment in a real-life patient population with asthma in the United Kingdom. NPJ Prim. Care Respir. Med. 27, 17008 (2017).
Mash, B., Bheekie, A. & Jones, P. W. Inhaled vs oral steroids for adults with chronic asthma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD002160 (2001).
Barry, P. W. & O’Callaghan, C. A comparative analysis of the particle size output of beclomethasone diproprionate, salmeterol xinafoate and fluticasone propionate metered dose inhalers used with the Babyhaler, Volumatic and Aerochamber spacer devices. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 47, 357–360 (1999).
t Jong, G. W., Eland, I. A., Sturkenboom, M. C., van den Anker, J. N. & Strickerf, B. H. Unlicensed and off-label prescription of respiratory drugs to children. Eur. Respir. J. 23, 310–313 (2004).
Price, D. B. et al. Inhaler errors in the CRITIKAL study: type, frequency, and association with asthma outcomes. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 5, 1071–1081 (2017). e1079.
Reznik, M., Silver, E. J. & Cao, Y. Evaluation of MDI-spacer utilization and technique in caregivers of urban minority children with persistent asthma. J. Asthma 51, 149–154 (2014).
Crespo-Lessmann, A., Plaza, V., Gonzalez-Barcala, F. J., Fernandez-Sanchez, T. & Sastre, J. Concordance of opinions between patients and physicians and their relationship with symptomatic control and future risk in patients with moderate-severe asthma. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 4, e000189 (2017).
Price, D. et al. Complementing the randomized controlled trial evidence base. Evolution not revolution. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 11, S92–98 (2014).
Roche, N. et al. Integrating real-life studies in the global therapeutic research framework. Lancet Respir. Med. 1, e29–30 (2013).
Boulet, L. P. Perception of the role and potential side effects of inhaled corticosteroids among asthmatic patients. Chest 113, 587–592 (1998).
van Boven, J. F. et al. Enhancing respiratory medication adherence: the role of health care professionals and cost-effectiveness considerations. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 4, 835–846 (2016).
Britten, N., Stevenson, F., Gafaranga, J., Barry, C. & Bradley, C. The expression of aversion to medicines in general practice consultations. Soc. Sci. Med. 59, 1495–1503 (2004).
Price, D. et al. Clinical and cost effectiveness of switching asthma patients from fluticasone-salmeterol to extra-fine particle beclometasone-formoterol: a retrospective matched observational study of real-world patients. Prim. Care Respir. 22, 439–448 (2013).
OPCRD. The Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD), https://opcrd.co.uk/ (2016).
Tate, A. R. et al. Exploiting the potential of large databases of electronic health records for research using rapid search algorithms and an intuitive query interface. J. Am. Med Inform. Assoc. 21, 292–298 (2014).
Cooper, V. et al. Patient-reported side effects, concerns and adherence to corticosteroid treatment for asthma, and comparison with physician estimates of side-effect prevalence: a UK-wide, cross-sectional study. NPJ Prim. Care Respir. Med. 25, 15026 (2015).
Ricardo Balduino and Tim BohnEarly Flight, Creative Commons Introduction
As we described in Part 1 of this series, our objective is to help predict the probability of the cancellation of a flight between two of the ten U.S. airports most affected by weather conditions. We use historical flights data and historical weather data to make predictions for upcoming flights.
Over the course of this four-part series, we use different platforms to help us with those predictions. Here in Part 2, we use the IBM SPSS Modeler and APIs from The Weather Company.Tools used in this use case solution
IBM SPSS Modeler is designed to help discover patterns and trends in structured and unstructured data with an intuitive visual interface supported by advanced analytics. It provides a range of advanced algorithms and analysis techniques, including text analytics, entity analytics, decision management and optimization to deliver insights in near real-time. For this use case, we used SPSS Modeler 18.1 to create a visual representation of the solution, or in SPSS terms, a stream. That’s right — not one line of code was written in the making of this blog.
We also used The Weather Company APIs to retrieve historical weather data for the ten airports over the year 2016. IBM SPSS Modeler supports calling the weather APIs from within a stream. That is accomplished by adding extensions to SPSS, available in the IBM SPSS Predictive Analytics resources page, a.k.a. Extensions Hub.A proposed solution
In this blog, we propose one possible solution for this problem. It’s not meant to be the only or the best possible solution, or a production-level solution for that matter, but the discussion presented here covers the typical iterative process (described in the sections below) that helps us accumulate insights and refine the predictive model across iterations. We encourage the readers to try and come up with different solutions, and provide us with your feedback for future blogs.Business and data understanding
The first step of the iterative process includes understanding and gathering the data needed to train and test our model later.
Flights data — We gathered 2016 flights data from the US Bureau of Transportation Statistics website. The website allows us to export one month at a time, so we ended up with 12 csv (comma separated value) files. We used IBM SPSS Modeler to merge all the csv files into one set and to select the ten airports in our scope. Some data clean-up and formatting was done to validate dates and hours for each flight, as seen in Figure 1.Figure 1 — gathering and preparing flights data in IBM SPSS Modeler
Weather data — From the Extensions Hub, we added the TWCHistoricalGridded extension to SPSS Modeler, which made the extension available as a node in the tool. That node took a csv file listing the 10 airports latitude and longitude coordinates as input, and generated the historical hourly data for the entire year of 2016, for each airport location, as seen in Figure 2.Figure 2 — gathering and preparing weather data in IBM SPSS Modeler
Combined flights and weather data — To each flight in the first data set, we added two new columns: ORIGIN and DEST, containing the respective airport codes. Next, flight data and the weather data were merged together. Note: the “stars” or SPSS super nodes in Figure 3 are placeholders for the diagrams in Figures 1 and 2 above.Figure 3 — combining flights and weather data in IBM SPSS Modeler Data preparation, modeling, and evaluation
We iteratively performed the following steps until the desired model qualities were reached:
· Prepare data
· Perform modeling
· Evaluate the model
Figure 4 shows the first and second iterations of our process in IBM SPSS Modeler.Figure 4 — iterations: prepare data, run models, evaluate — and do it again First iteration
To start preparing the data, we used the combined flights and weather data from the previous step and performed some data cleanup (e.g. took care of null values). In order to better train the model later on, we filtered out rows where flight cancellations were not related to weather conditions (e.g. cancellations due to technical issues, security issues, etc.)Figure 5 — imbalanced data found in our input data set
This is an interesting use case, and often a hard one to solve, due to the imbalanced data it presents, as seen in Figure 5. By “imbalanced” we mean that there were far more non-cancelled flights in the historical data than cancelled ones. We will discuss how we dealt with imbalanced data in the following iteration.
Next, we defined which features were required as inputs to the model (such as flight date, hour, day of the week, origin and destination airport codes, and weather conditions), and which one was the target to be generated by the model (i.e. predict the cancellation status). We then partitioned the data into training and testing sets, using an 85/15 ratio.
The partitioned data was fed into an SPSS node called Auto Classifier. This node allowed us to run multiple models at once and preview their outputs, such as the area under the ROC curve, as seen in Figure 6.Figure 6 — models output provided by the Auto Classifier node
That was a useful step in making an initial selection of a model for further refinement during subsequent iterations. We decided to use the Random Trees model since the initial analysis showed it has the best area under the curve as compared to the other models in the list.Second iteration
During the second iteration, we addressed the skewedness of the original data. For that purpose, we chose one of the SPSS nodes called SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique). This node provides an advanced over-sampling algorithm that deals with imbalanced datasets, which helped our selected model work more effectively.Figure 7 — distribution of cancelled and non-cancelled flights after using SMOTE
In Figure 7, we notice a more balanced distribution between cancelled and non-cancelled flights after running the data through SMOTE.
As mentioned earlier, we picked the Random Trees model for this sample solution. This SPSS node provides a model for tree-based classification and prediction that is built on Classification and Regression Tree methodology. Due to its characteristics, this model is much less prone to overfitting, which gives a higher likelihood of repeating the same test results when you use new data, that is, data that was not part of the original training and testing data sets. Another advantage of this method — in particular for our use case — is its ability to handle imbalanced data.
Since in this use case we are dealing with classification analysis, we used two common ways to evaluate the performance of the model: confusion matrix and ROC curve. One of the outputs of running the Random Trees model in SPSS is the confusion matrix seen in Figure 8. The table shows the precision achieved by the model during training.Figure 8 — Confusion Matrix for cancelled vs. non-cancelled flights
In this case, the model’s precision was about 95% for predicting cancelled flights (true positives), and about 94% for predicting non-cancelled flights (true negatives). That means, the model was correct most of the time, but also made wrong predictions about 4–5% of the time (false negatives and false positives).
That was the precision given by the model using the training data set. This is also represented by the ROC curve on the left side of Figure 9. We can see, however, that the area under the curve for the training data set was better than the area under the curve for the testing data set (right side of Figure 9), which means that during testing, the model did not perform as well as during training (i.e. it presented a higher rate of errors, or higher rate of false negatives and false positives).Figure 9 — ROC curves for the training and testing data sets
Nevertheless, we decided that the results were still good for the purposes of our discussion in this blog, and we stopped our iterations here. We encourage readers to further refine this model or even to use other models that could solve this use case.Deploying the model
Finally, we deployed the model as a REST API that developers can call from their applications. For that, we created a “deployment branch” in the SPSS stream. Then, we used the IBM Watson Machine Learning service available on IBM Bluemix here. We imported the SPSS stream into the Bluemix service, which generated a scoring endpoint (or URL) that application developers can call. Developers can also call The Weather Company APIs directly from their application code to retrieve the forecast data for the next day, week, and so on, in order to pass the required data to the scoring endpoint and make the prediction.
A typical scoring endpoint provided by the Watson Machine Learning service would look like the URL shown below.
https://ibm-watson-ml.mybluemix.net/pm/v1/score/flights-cancellation?accesskey=<provided by WML service>
By passing the expected JSON body that includes the required inputs for scoring (such as the future flight data and forecast weather data), the scoring endpoint above returns if a given flight is likely to be cancelled or not. This is seen in Figure 10, which shows a call being made to the scoring endpoint — and its response — using an HTTP requester tool available in a web browser.Figure 10 — actual request URL, JSON body, and response from scoring endpoint
Notice in the JSON response above that the deployed model predicted this particular flight from Newark to Chicago would be 88.8% likely to be cancelled, based on forecast weather conditions.Conclusion
IBM SPSS Modeler is a powerful tool that helped us visually create a solution for this use case without writing a single line of code. We were able to follow an iterative process that helped us understand and prepare the data, then model and evaluate the solution, to finally deploy the model as an API for consumption by application developers.Resources
The IBM SPSS stream and data used as the basis for this blog are available on GitHub. There you can also find instructions on how to download IBM SPSS Modeler, get a key for The Weather Channel APIs, and much more.
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11780471
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-1AH
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12442402
Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/12/where-can-i-get-help-to-pass-sps-100.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/WhereCanIGetHelpToPassSps-100Exam
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/vii7ro4gtekzvcc38nn3879v2y78cjax
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/669w044aeacd8606d4fd6bbfab90603b8878f