|Exam Name||:||Designing and Implementing HP P4000 SAN(R) Solutions|
|Questions and Answers||:||60 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||February 18, 2019|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||Pass4sure HP0-J45 Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure HP0-J45 Full Version|
HP0-J45 exam Dumps Source : Designing and Implementing HP P4000 SAN(R) Solutions
Test Code : HP0-J45
Test Name : Designing and Implementing HP P4000 SAN(R) Solutions
Vendor Name : HP
Q&A : 60 Real Questions
Where will I find material for HP0-J45 exam?
It have been years and i was stuck on the equal designation, it turned into like being glued to the chair with fevicol. to begin with you think, simply wait precise matters come in time. however then your persistence wears off and you realizeyou gotta take a stand earlier than its too past due. on the grounds that my work entails in general coping with a HP0-J45 consumers base I decided to ace it and come to be the he is aware of all about HP0-J45 dude in the office. Upon a palssteerage I attempted your HP0-J45 demo from killexams.com, cherished and it and moved onto a purchase. Your testengine is excellent and nowadays your observe kit has made me the brand new HP0-J45 manager.
satisfactory experience with Q&A, bypass with high score.
My planning for the exam HP0-J45 was incorrect and subjects seemed tough for me as nicely. As a snappy reference, I depended on the questions and answers by way of killexams.com and it delivered what I wished. tons oblige to the killexams.com for the assistance. To the point noting method of this aide became not tough to seize for me as nicely. I surely retained all that I should. A score of 92% became agreeable, contrasting with my 1-week war.
it's miles splendid to have HP0-J45 dumps.
Thank You killexams.com for full assist via offering this question bank. I scored 78% in HP0-J45 Exam.
in which am i able to discover HP0-J45 real exam questions questions?
hello pals! Gotta pass the HP0-J45 exam and no time for research Dont worry. i will solve year trouble in case u believe me. I had comparable scenario as time became short. textual content books didnt help. So, I searched for an smooth solution and got one with the killexams. Their questions & answers labored so rightly for me. Helped clean the principles and mug the hard ones. found all questions identical as the manual and scored well. Very helpful stuff, killexams.
Can i am getting brand new dumps with real Q & A of HP0-J45 examination?
i bought HP0-J45 instruction % and passed the exam. No issues in any respect, the whole lot is exactly as they promise. smooth exam experience, no problems to record. thank you.
actual HP0-J45 examination inquiries to bypass examination at first try.
I without a doubt purchased this HP0-J45 braindump, as soon as I heard that killexams.com has the updates. Its right, they have got gotblanketed all new areas, and the exam looks very clean. Given the latest replace, their turn around time and manual is terrific.
precisely equal questions, WTF!
Im able to recommend you to go back right right here to put off all fears related to HP0-J45 certification because that is a exceptional platform to offer you with assured objects to your arrangements. I used to be concerned for HP0-J45 exam however all way to killexams.com who provided me with top notch merchandise for my education. I used to be definitely concerned about my fulfillment but it emerge as first-class HP0-J45 exam engine that elevated my success self belief and now im feeling delight in this unconditional help. Hats off to you and your improbable services for all students and specialists!
Believe it or not, Just try HP0-J45 study questions once!
I organized HP0-J45 with the help of killexams.com and determined that they have quite suitable stuff. I will pass for otherHP tests as well.
it's miles actually notable enjoy to have HP0-J45 actual test questions.
This killexams.com from helped me get my HP0-J45 partner affirmation. Their materials are truly useful, and the exam simulator is simply incredible, it completely reproduces the exam. Topics are clear very easily using the killexams.com study material. The exam itself was unpredictable, so Im joyful I utilized killexams.com Q&A. Their packs spread all that I need, and I wont get any unsavory shocks amid your exam. Thanx Guys.
Do you want updated dumps for HP0-J45 exam? right here it's far.
The killexams.com dump is simple to recognize and enough to put together for the HP0-J45 exam. No other test material I used along side the Dumps. My heartfelt way to you for growing such an noticeably powerful, simple dump for the hardexam. I in no way thought I ought to skip this exam without difficulty with none tries. You people made it take place. I answered 76 questions maximum efficaciously in the real exam. thanks for imparting me an modern product.
This counsel is for the 2018/19 session.
Dr Mylene Lagarde COW 3.02
This path is purchasable on the MSc in global fitness policy, MSc in health coverage, Planning and Financing, MSc in foreign fitness coverage and MSc in foreign health policy (fitness Economics). This route is obtainable with permission as an outdoor option to students on other programmes the place rules enable.
Randomized trials have long been used within the scientific world to test the efficacy of clinical remedies. lately, social scientists have begun using the same strategy, the usage of random task to allocate materials or put into effect a policy intervention in a different way to different agencies, as a way to verify the causal effects of the policy of activity. The recognition of randomized reviews has grown certainly, but now not exclusively, amongst researchers and policymakers in low- and core-salary settings.
Conducting a a success randomized evaluation comprises many inter-linked steps and a good knowing of a number of statistical ideas. Randomized reviews also continually require to design and organise the facts assortment of primary and beneficial counsel, which involves a couple of essential steps to stay away from pitfalls. it is hence essential to remember these distinct steps to design and enforce randomised evaluations correctly, or to be in a position to critically analyse them.
This course proposes a palms-on and intuitive strategy to designing and conducting a randomised assessment. within the first half of the direction, we are able to discuss factors for conducting randomised evaluations; the way to design the randomise experiment to make certain it answers the query(s) of pastime (together with considerations of statistical vigour and sample size calculation); a way to contend with threats to randomisation. within the 2nd half of the direction, we will focus on purposeful issues raised via simple information assortment, including how to top-rated measure results of interest; the way to design respectable equipment and the way to conduct and manage fieldwork.
Seminars will be designed to motivate students to significantly have interaction with the issues and follow the technical talents taught. each seminar might be intently aligned with the lecture content material to provide students the possibility to practice the brand new capabilities. Case stories may be chosen from a variety of cultural backgrounds, to allow the presentation of a diverse range of settings and issues.
15 hours of lectures and 15 hours of seminars in the LT.
A draft protocol. college students could be asked to put up a short 1,500 observe draft protocol by using week 8. whereas some elements of their work may additionally nonetheless be work in development (e.g. the usage of bullet points), college students should be expected to write down up the first half of their protocol in a more targeted method. The outlines will be graded and comments given to students. This allows college students to get valuable journey of writing at MSc degree at LSE, and they will also have in mind extra peculiarly the expectations of the summative assessment. college students could be capable of use this feedback in their writing of the summative work.
analysis concept (100%) within the LT.
The goal of the research protocol (4,000 phrases max) could be to plot the randomised assessment of a specific health programme. students can be asked to decide upon one programme from a proposed record. they are going to even be given the option to choose their personal intervention (pending agreement by means of their seminar chief).
Microsoft confirmed off the first buyer windows mixed truth head-hooked up displays (HMDs) from companions such as Acer, Dell, HP, and Lenovo lower back in October 2017 at an adventure in San Francisco. The contraptions launched alongside the home windows 10 Fall Creators update, with expenditures beginning at $299. The HMDs got here with different designs, but similar standards reminiscent of a 1440X1440 decision monitor, and framerates of 60fps for PCs with built-in photographs and 90fps for systems with discrete images.
whereas now not lots in the approach of a refresh to lots of these devices took place, Samsung launched its 2nd-era HMD, the Odyssey+ in October 2018, with advancements to requirements and the design of the gadget. quickly, one more new headset could be on the style, as HP is additionally readying it subsequent-era HMD, as per the folks at RoadtoVR who got an exclusive preview of the unannounced home windows mixed fact headset, codenamed ‘Copper’.
The document states that HP is re-designing its HMD from the ground up, and from the appears of it, it does appear to be a big replace. The device now activities an Oculus Rift-like design with the head straps going throughout the facets and above the pinnacle, meeting at a round structure on the lower back. The equipment is also expected to come with a heathered fabric on the entrance where the cameras for monitoring can be found. The headset is said to be lighter, making it greater relaxed to put on, and it will also feature greater mechanicals to make it easier to put on and remove.
As for specs, the next-generation machine will offer a 2160X2160 resolution display per eye, making it the most pixel-dense display in a combined fact Headset yet. In evaluation, Samsung’s new Odyssey+ activities a 1440X1600 resolution screen per eye. undoubtedly, the denser monitor makes for crisp, clear images, bringing lots-vital advancements to the experience. The denser monitor additionally helps masks the screen door impact (the impact led to with the aid of the unlit areas between any two pixels), negating the need for further components like the diffuser on Samsung’s Odyssey+.
HP states that the advancements to the HMD got here from its business consumers and that the customers didn’t trust the container of view a huge enviornment of concern as an awful lot because the decision and comfort. The enterprise is planning on bringing this headset to its gadget as a service for VR providing as part of the Z with the aid of HP brand.
whereas HP didn't exhibit particulars concerning the launch date or pricing, the enterprise did verify that it might be promoting the device to each, organizations and patrons. home windows blended truth has been receiving improvements in the latest check builds for the next main home windows 10 replace, which may well-nigh definitely be referred to as the home windows 10 April 2019 replace. The platform has additionally begun seeing elevated relevance in gaming, so it should be wonderful to look how smartly ‘Copper’ can be got, and if the improvements inspire more clients to trust it.
source: RoadtoVR via Thurrott
Autodesk, an award-winning American software company, has collaborated with HP and GE Additive to increase generative design utility equipment that work directly with 3D printers.
in line with Autodesk’s Netfabb and Fusion 360, the design-to-print workflow for additive manufacturing could be integrated in HP Multi Jet Fusion and GE Direct metal Laser Melting (DMLM) programs to enhance swift prototyping for production-capable 3D printed constituents.
Robert Yancey, director of producing business method at Autodesk, defined to Design information:
“To release the total price of HP MJF printers, you want an excellent design, an excellent cloth, and a pretty good print method. Autodesk develops the design tools and expertise, HP develops the print system, and HP with their cloth companions develops the substances. All features are required to achieve maximum effectivity.”The HP Jet Fusion 3D 4210/4200 Printing solution. photograph by way of HP.
A generative workflow
throughout Formnext, HP introduced a partnership with Autodesk to allow generative design capabilities across the whole HP Multi Jet Fusion portfolio. Following this collaboration, Christoph Schell, President of 3D Printing and Digital Manufacturing, HP Inc., cited:
“Many industries corresponding to car, which is going through its largest transformation in more than one hundred years, are looking to new applied sciences and strategic companions like HP to help them greater compete in this time of exchange.”
“we're working with innovators to alternate the style they design and manufacture, unlocking new applications, extra manufacturing flexibility, and stronger innovation, effectivity, and sustainability throughout their product construction lifecycle.”
similarly, Autodesk is working with GE Additive to streamline metal additive manufacturing. the usage of GE Additive’s application algorithms, interfaces, and really good facts models, this workflow will present predictive insights for charge and timeline projections within the early stages of design.
“Working with Autodesk will give a powerful design-to-print atmosphere for our valued clientele, assisting decrease the boundaries of additive adoption while accelerating a consumer’s time to first respectable part,” pointed out Lars Bruns, executive application leader at GE Additive.3D printed bike constituents from HP. image by way of HP/ Motus.
enforcing an end-to-end workflow
As a mutual consumer of Autodesk and HP, Penumbra Engineering, a americagenerative design company, these days used Autodesk’s design-to-print workflow to produce an ultrasonic sensing gadget. This 3D printed part was designed to be light-weight and durable within excessive environments.
“The Penumbra case analyze uncovers the value of HP working with Autodesk generative design technology,” delivered Yancey.
“We’re helping HP printers in Fusion 360 and Netfabb so that HP multi-jet fusion clients have the design and print prep tools they want. We’re working with HP to provide assist for the brand new metallic printers.”A 3D printed handheld transducer created by using Penumbra Engineering. photograph by way of Penumbra Engineering,
post your nominations now for the 3D Printing industry Awards 2019.
additionally, for the newest 3D Printing business updates subscribe to our publication, observe us on Twitter and like us on fb.
in quest of a sparkling delivery in the new year? seek advice from 3D Printing Jobs to commence your career in additive manufacturing.
Featured photograph suggests 3D printed materials from HP. photograph by the use of HP.
While it is very hard task to choose reliable certification questions / answers resources with respect to review, reputation and validity because people get ripoff due to choosing wrong service. Killexams.com make it sure to serve its clients best to its resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other's ripoff report complaint clients come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams happily and easily. We never compromise on our review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client confidence is important to us. Specially we take care of killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If you see any false report posted by our competitors with the name killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just keep in mind that there are always bad people damaging reputation of good services due to their benefits. There are thousands of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our sample questions and sample brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
HPE2-K44 free pdf | 1Z0-335 braindumps | A2090-611 practice questions | HP0-J63 exam questions | ISFS free pdf | C9520-928 real questions | 3X0-204 VCE | 3001 real questions | 200-125 braindumps | HP2-K24 practice test | CFA-Level-III cram | HP0-D01 Practice test | HP2-H38 braindumps | HP2-B97 real questions | 090-077 bootcamp | M2065-741 examcollection | 000-773 brain dumps | 1Z0-581 study guide | JK0-U21 sample test | 712-50 dump |
Guarantee your prosperity with this HP0-J45 question bank
killexams.com real HP0-J45 exam simulator is phenomenally reassuring for our clients for the exam prep. Monstrously basic questions, references and definitions are included in brain dumps pdf. Get-together the data in a solitary area is a real help and reasons you get readied for the IT confirmation exam inside a snappy time allotment cross. The HP0-J45 exam gives key core interests.
We have our experts working continuously for the collection of real exam questions of HP0-J45. All the pass4sure questions and answers of HP0-J45 collected by our team are reviewed and updated by our HP certified team. We remain connected to the candidates appeared in the HP0-J45 test to get their reviews about the HP0-J45 test, we collect HP0-J45 exam tips and tricks, their experience about the techniques used in the real HP0-J45 exam, the mistakes they done in the real test and then improve our material accordingly.
Once you go through our pass4sure questions and answers, you will feel confident about all the topics of test and feel that your knowledge has been greatly improved. These pass4sure questions and answers are not just practice questions, these are real exam questions and answers that are enough to pass the HP0-J45 exam at first attempt.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
Quality and Value for the HP0-J45 Exam: killexams.com Practice Exams for HP HP0-J45 are composed to the simple best necessities of specialized exactness, utilizing just certified issue check masters and distributed creators for improvement.
100% Guarantee to Pass Your HP0-J45 Exam: If you don't pass the HP HP0-J45 exam the utilization of our killexams.com experimenting with engine, we will give you a FULL REFUND of your purchasing expense.
Downloadable, Interactive HP0-J45 Testing engines: Our HP HP0-J45 Preparation Material presents you all that you will need to take HP HP0-J45 exam. Subtle elements are examined and delivered by utilizing HP Certification Experts who're always the utilization of industry delight in to give one of a kind, and legitimate.
- Comprehensive questions and answers about HP0-J45 exam - HP0-J45 exam questions joined by displays - Verified Answers by Experts and very nearly 100% right - HP0-J45 exam questions updated on general premise - HP0-J45 exam planning is in various decision questions (MCQs). - Tested by different circumstances previously distributing - Try free HP0-J45 exam demo before you choose to get it in killexams.com
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
Killexams 1Z0-333 sample test | Killexams HP0-Y21 braindumps | Killexams ECP-102 test questions | Killexams 1T6-220 test prep | Killexams 200-101 free pdf | Killexams 000-881 exam prep | Killexams NCCT-ICS Practice test | Killexams 050-683 examcollection | Killexams JN0-634 cheat sheets | Killexams 1Z0-898 Practice Test | Killexams HP2-N28 exam prep | Killexams HP0-M19 VCE | Killexams IIA-CIA-Part1 study guide | Killexams HP2-H35 dump | Killexams 000-714 dumps | Killexams 9L0-504 braindumps | Killexams 70-417 mock exam | Killexams HP0-Y52 free pdf | Killexams C2180-608 brain dumps | Killexams CQIA braindumps |
Killexams TB0-110 questions answers | Killexams COG-320 brain dumps | Killexams NS0-310 braindumps | Killexams 642-542 study guide | Killexams 70-768 examcollection | Killexams P2090-046 questions and answers | Killexams BCNS-CNS real questions | Killexams 000-607 free pdf | Killexams C2090-180 real questions | Killexams 1Z0-485 Practice Test | Killexams 250-253 test questions | Killexams C2010-576 test prep | Killexams 000-M63 Practice test | Killexams 000-029 free pdf download | Killexams 3I0-010 dump | Killexams C2150-810 cram | Killexams 9A0-154 study guide | Killexams NNAAP-NA braindumps | Killexams 350-020 practice test | Killexams M8060-730 practice questions |
Remember, a system landscape exists for each mySAP solution—if you deploy R/3, APO, CRM, and PLM, you will in effect be creating four different SAP system landscapes, one for each product. The focus in this and the following few sections, though, is on what one of these system landscapes looks like from a design and planning perspective, for example R/3 alone or APO alone.
In the most general form, an SAP system landscape consists of SAP instances (installations of the SAP database and application software) and SAP servers. In the Microsoft world of SAP implementations, there is a one-to-one correlation between instances and servers nearly all the time. That is, the Development instance resides on a dedicated Development server, the Test instance resides on a dedicated Test server, and so on. In the world of UNIX implementations, though, multiple instances can be often found on a single "larger" server. For example, both Development and Test instances can reside on a single server. And multiple application instances can be installed on a single server as well.
Until last year's release of SAP's Multiple Components, One Database (MCOD) initiative, there was a one-to-one correlation between instances and database systems, too, regardless of the Operating System platform. MCOD is beginning to change this, such that a single "larger" database can be leveraged for multiple instances. However, an important difference between MCOD and multiple instances/one server exists—MCOD ties the same type of databases within different SAP system landscapes together. With MCOD, all Development databases used by your R/3, SRM, CRM, and Workplace implementations can be one and the same. Similarly, all Test databases across R/3, SRM, CRM, and Workplace can be bundled together, too, as illustrated in Figure 3.3. Note, however, that in many cases SAP AG frowns on mixing OLTP and OLAP systems, or combining different databases within the same system landscape. In that regard, forcing an MCOD database server to host your R/3 system's Development and Test databases would therefore be unsupported and contrary to best practices.
Figure 3.3 A properly architected sample MCOD deployment is displayed for a typical mySAP enterprise consisting of R/3, CRM, SRM, and Workplace.
As we move forward with our basic understanding of SAP system landscapes, and seek to understand how your SAP solution vision impacts and is impacted by your landscape decisions, my hope is to achieve the following:
Note the relative importance and relationship of technology perspectives to our solution vision
Understand why each system landscape is important to fulfilling our vision
Note how the presence or absence of a particular system within a landscape impacts the other systems and ultimately the overall solution vision
All these design and planning approaches I cover tend to come into play in one manner or another across all mySAP implementations. It's how they are weighted or addressed that makes one system landscape different from the next.Simplifying Your SAP System Landscape
After spending time with hundreds of customers and SAP implementations, I think it is safe to say that when all things are equal, the desire to simplify emerges as an important driver. Simplification takes many forms, too. In the case of the SAP system landscape and how it fulfills our SAP solution vision, the desire to simplify manifests itself in any number of ways:
First, the pure number of instances will be reduced to the fewest necessary to get the job done "right" for a particular company. An organization focused on simplifying administrative, change management, systems management, operations, and other tasks will deploy a three-system or even a two-system landscape, whereas similar organizations without the same simplification goals can deploy more. There are trade-offs, of course. A system landscape without a dedicated test instance will, for example, be forced to perform testing in the same system used for development. Because of these kinds of limitations, simplification achieved through instance reductions is not as common as it has been in the past.
Instead, a more popular approach to simplification seeks to reduce the number of physical servers in a particular system landscape, by installing multiple instances on a single server. Consolidation of instances is becoming quite common in SAP customer environments today, as displayed in Figure 3.4.
Figure 3.4 Multiple SAP instances can be installed and configured on a single physical server, oftentimes reducing both acquisition and systems management costs down the road.
Similarly, deploying a shared disk subsystem and tape backup/restore solution also simplifies a very complex piece of the SAP Solution Stack. This is why my colleagues and I have spent so much time in the last two years designing and implementing Storage Area Networks, or SANs—they provide outstanding performance while simultaneously reducing system landscape complexity and allowing expensive resources like enterprise tape libraries to be shared between systems.
Another customer of mine shared with me why they went with the WebGUI as opposed to the classic SAPGUI approach to system accessibility—to simplify desktop support and maintenance requirements.
Companies that value simplification will also standardize on a particular solution stack option or approach, too, as this simplifies support and maintenance, and minimizes the need for a variety of onsite/reserved spare parts, the time spent in change management activities, and more.
Although simplification tends to work in one direction by encouraging a "do more with less" philosophy, our next topic goes the other route in that it purposefully introduces complexity and differences between various systems within a system landscape—high availability.High Availability and the SAP System Landscape
When it comes to high availability, many technology professionals automatically think about what it means to improve the availability of a particular system or hardware component—thoughts of basic HA offerings like clustering or redundancy come to mind. With regard to the broader topic of how your solution vision impacts your SAP system landscape, though, high availability equates to the following:
Business-driven requirements—HA offerings and approaches are normally implemented to satisfy specific business-oriented needs, and therefore form an integral part of your overall SAP solution vision.
Complexity—HA complicates the SAP system landscape, as HA offerings and approaches tend to only really exist or apply to the Production system and at minimum (hopefully!) another similarly configured system within the landscape.
Increased support needs—Because HA offerings are inherently complex, a very real need exists to prepare your SAP support organization in how to install it, update it, manage it, and troubleshoot HA issues.
To read more about how business requirements relate to high availability, see "Availability Planning—Documenting Requirements and Key Drivers," p. 167 in Chapter 6.Disaster Recovery Considerations
All companies implement a method of addressing Disaster Recovery (DR), whether or not they actually realize it. Even companies that do not add a dedicated DR system to their system landscape address disaster recovery. That is, their de facto disaster recovery plan simply reflects the challenges and timeframes surrounding rebuilding their SAP system from scratch, restoring from their latest tape backup, and imposing upon their end users to manually rekey any new business transactions lost between the last successful tape backup and the point at which the disaster occurred. This doesn't sound like much of a "plan," of course, but it does represent a baseline against which all other disaster recovery approaches and solutions can be weighed.
A host of DR approaches are discussed throughout Chapter 6, from those involving disk subsystem data replication solutions, to various clustering solutions, to database and mySAP-specific tactics. But when it comes to sifting the potential layout of your SAP system landscape through your solution vision, two general approaches fall out:
Both approaches are valid, and the first is more traditional. But I believe that the time and expense related to setting up, configuring, keeping current, and managing your own DR system explains the recent increase in outsourcing I've seen over the last two years.
To review some of the tasks and considerations inherent to addressing DR internally as opposed to outsourcing it, see "SAP General Availability and DR Best Practices," p. 207 in Chapter 6.
Companies that outsource the DR component of their SAP system landscape help to preserve their data, and access to this data, in that the outsourcer operates a completely independent data center, typically in a very different geographic location. For smaller and mid-size companies with only a single data center, the expense relief is tremendous. On the other hand, if the DR solution is maintained "in-house," so to speak, it will need to be housed in a separate facility. This alone is sure to drive complexity, cost, and even the architecture and makeup of both the SAP system landscape and its individual systems.Addressing Training Requirements
The SAP system landscape is directly impacted by the potential need to train SAP end users as well as the system's developers and technical support staff. Three different systems come into play, as illustrated in Figure 3.5:
A dedicated Training system is often implemented to assist in teaching users new to a particular mySAP component how to actually use the system. This amounts to business-process training as well as SAP user interface training (an excellent alternative to creating multiple training clients on the Test system, which is busy fulfilling integration responsibilities prior to Go-Live—the exact time when end users need to be trained!). To provide the most value to its students, the Training system needs to be an exact copy of Production.
A dedicated Technical Sandbox system is extremely useful in helping the SAP Technical Support Organization (SAP TSO) get up to speed on the entire SAP Solution Stack, especially with regard to new components and complex HA offerings (rather than attempting to get time on other systems for what could amount to crash-and-burn testing).
A dedicated Business Sandbox or Development Sandbox system allows developers unfamiliar with a particular mySAP component, or faced with integrating multiple components and other legacy systems, the opportunity to do so in a pure testing environment (rather than the real Development system).
Figure 3.5 These SAP training systems support the different needs of different organizations, from end users, to developers and programmers, to technical implementation specialists.
For details as to how the SAP system landscape satisfies the training needs of both the SAP Technical Support Organization and the production system's end users, see "Training and the Role of the SAP System Landscape," p. 314 in Chapter 9.
It can represent quite a challenge for the "customers" of one of these training systems to convince everyone that such a system is truly required. In my own experience, I have seen the lack of a Technical Sandbox really hurt an organization in terms of downtime due to botched infrastructure upgrades and changes to DR processes.
Another colleague of mine has more than once had to strongly push for the adoption of a Training system, too. Such a system allows for extensive informal user testing and practice outside of formally delivered training. He believes that this extra level of hands-on self-directed training is critical because your end-user community is best positioned of all groups to find business-process operational errors and limitations. And of course it is desirable to correct these issues well before Go-Live. But a consultant or even a senior super user is typically not positioned to push the adoption and use of a dedicated Training system. More often than not, it takes the SAP Steering Committee, the project's experienced management team, and the prodding of a knowledgeable SAP Solution Architect to do so. I cannot stress this enough—the risk is huge, in that you do not want to find out too late that not every business scenario works as it did during integration testing (for example, all types of contracts, all types of material movements, all kinds of accounting entries, and so on).The Performance-Driven System Landscape
When it comes to evaluating your solution vision against the layout of your SAP system landscape, it is important to ensure that the performance of the systems meets the needs of their different end-user communities. Most of the time, of course, the focus is on designing, installing, and configuring a well-performing Production system. Performance considerations usually relate back to what an end user will experience while on the system, including
Business transaction response times, or how long it takes to refresh your SAPGUI after pressing the Enter key, for example.
How quickly a background or "batch" job will execute, otherwise known as throughput.
How quickly a report or other query will make it through the system and actually be printed, sometimes called latency.
To read more about verifying that a Production system can meet performance expectations, see "Key SAP Stress-Testing Considerations," p. 580 in Chapter 16.
However, these same performance considerations apply to all of the other systems within the SAP system landscape, too. The Development system, for example, needs to exhibit excellent performance even while 25 or 50 or more developers are banging away at keyboards trying to build your custom mySAP solution. Similarly, your Test system needs to provide the performance necessary to get through integration testing. Even the Training system needs to provide adequate user response times so as to make the actual training experience more than something to be avoided.
High-performance considerations cover the gamut, touching every facet of every system within the landscape. This means that everything—from the performance of the network connecting each system, to each server's CPU, RAM, and disk configuration, to each system's OS, database, and mySAP component—must be addressed. Starting off on the right foot (with properly sized and configured hardware and software elements) is paramount, of course, but tuning all these solution stack pieces to create a cohesive well-running machine is just as important to achieving excellent performance. Like the weakest link in a chain, a single underperforming solution component will only throttle back the maximum performance otherwise obtainable from your system.Driving Scalability into Your System Landscape
The need for scalability, like high availability and excellent performance, is addressed primarily through the sizing process. Scalability does not pay off up front in terms of improved system availability or better user response times, though. Rather, scalability is all about paying for "headroom" in your system, headroom that is not actually needed at present but might be required in the near future. In other words, scalability addresses future planned and unplanned growth in your system.
This growth can manifest itself in a number of ways. In my experience in the real world, I have seen the results of unplanned growth hurt companies where scalability was never addressed, as in the following cases:
The number of end users increased at one of my new accounts, not due to more hiring than was anticipated when their mySAP.com solution was crafted, but because they unexpectedly acquired their competitor and doubled in size. We had six months to project the delta needed in terms of database and application server processing power and RAM requirements, followed by stress-testing the new design and finally implementing it.
More than one of my customers' databases grew so fast that they outstripped the results of their comprehensive three-year database sizing methodology in the first year! In most cases, the system we put in place for these customers was scalable—more disk drives could be added, smaller drives could be swapped with larger ones, and so on. In three cases in particular, though, the database growth was so explosive that a whole new disk subsystem platform needed to be brought in, and the recently acquired current platform retired (or redeployed) years earlier than expected.
When databases grow quickly, the tape backup/restore solution implemented often grows less effective as well. I have seen this most often in relatively small SAP implementations, where an initial investment in tape backup technology needed to be tossed in favor of tape solutions that backed up more data per tape cartridge, and did so fast enough to not exceed the customer's backup window (time allotted to perform a backup, which usually equates to planned downtime in the case of offline full backups).
It's been a while, but I also had a customer outgrow their network, too. Today, with switched networks and Gigabit Ethernet providing more than adequate bandwidth to every mySAP.com server component, and cheap 10- and 100-Megabit Ethernet prevalent across end-user workstations, there's no excuse for lacking network scalability.
Outstripping the capabilities of your current system such that a new platform is needed probably represents a worst-case scenario. Not only does the current Production component need to be replaced, but to support sound change control principles, so does the same component in your Test, Staging, and/or Technical Sandbox environments.
This is why hardware and software vendors tout things like "highly scalable system architectures," "enterprise versions" of particular Operating Systems and Database Systems, and so on—though not necessarily needed up front, the headroom that these approaches provide helps an organization feel more comfortable if they wind up growing faster than they expected. And hardware vendors in particular can position their SAP clients for improved scalability by practicing the following:
Specify server platforms that allow additional CPUs and RAM to be added as needed. In other words, avoid "maxing out" the box.
Alternatively, design SAP solutions such that they take advantage of SAP's support for horizontal scalability. This is one of my favorite approaches when it comes to SAP Application, Web AS, J2EE middleware, and ITS servers—I prefer to max them out with regard to processors, with the understanding that an incremental number of servers can be added at any time should the environment grow to require it (interestingly, although SAP has successfully tested a system running more than 160 application servers, it is rare to find customer implementations with more than 10 or 12).
Architect a solution for the appropriate level of vertical scalability. In other words, if a two-tier "Central System" (where all SAP software components execute on the same physical server) approach to sizing meets today's requirements, perhaps a three-tier solution will provide for unknown scalability requirements. In a three-tiered architecture, one database server and multiple application servers are configured as a single system image.
Architect a highly scalable database platform. As my real-world examples earlier in this list illustrate, this tends to be where a lack of scalability causes the most problems.
Hardware and software vendors alike spend a great deal of time "proving" how scalable their offerings are. As a first step, I suggest that benchmarks, customer references/feedback, and the results of tests published through white papers and other technical documents be reviewed by prospective mySAP customers. I also suggest that you begin considering new approaches to scalability. For example, HP's iCOD offering touts "capacity on demand." When a customer buys a server, for instance, it is fully populated with CPUs. The customer pays for only what is needed in the near term, however. Later, if it is determined that more processing power is required, the customer takes advantage of the in-place processors by merely applying for a license; no intrusive field upgrade or service call is required and therefore the need for planned downtime is drastically reduced.The TCO-Driven System Landscape
More than anything else, Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) drives what a solution vision actually looks like at the end of the day, when a mySAP solution is implemented and really being used. Discussions on TCO might instead be labeled Return on Investment (ROI), or might fall under the heading of investment protection. Regardless, a focus on lowering TCO seeks to find less expensive solution-stack alternatives that still meet the needs of the business.
To read more about the relationship between TCO and your SAP solution vision, see "How the SAP Solution Vision Drives TCO," p. 127 in Chapter 5.
When all other things are equal, the following points apply from a hardware perspective:
A hardware vendor's use of common components like CPUs and memory boards allows flexible sharing of resources between different SAP system landscapes and in some cases hardware platforms, too.
Similarly, common disk drive form factors reduce cost of ownership by increasing reusability.
Support for hot-pluggable and/or hot-add hardware components eliminates or worst-case minimizes downtime (can include hard drives, tape drives, power supplies, fans, and even RAM and processors).
Support for redundant components, like power supplies, disk drives, fans, and so on, also eliminates or minimizes downtime.
The ability to run mixed-speed CPUs or RAM in a particular platform protects that investment—CPUs and RAM do not have to be tossed aside when additional processing power or memory is required.
Outsourcing your entire SAP infrastructure/operations team is another potential method of reducing TCO. In fact, outsourcing can represent the biggest potential TCO factor that a company will consider. At this level, though, outsourcing becomes more of a strategic business solution that impacts a lot more than simply TCO. True, outsourcing can cut labor costs by 50%, and enhance flexibility of a technical support organization to easily change as business requirements change, but there are drawbacks and disadvantages as well (discussed later in this chapter).
Another solution vision approach that impacts the SAP system landscape from both a configuration and TCO perspective is the use of an Application Service Provider (ASP). ASPs can drive lower TCO by virtue of their application-specific expertise, above and beyond that provided by in-house staff and traditional outsourcing providers. For example:
An ASP can offer a preconfigured solution stack for the particular mySAP solution you want to implement. This is one reason why they look so good from a TCO perspective—design, deployment, manageability, operations, and other cost factors are substantially reduced due to a high level of both standardization and core competencies in the services they provide.
ASPs were more or less born out of the dot-com era, and by virtue of this, their data centers enjoy the benefit of fat redundant pipes to the Internet. Thus, mySAP.com applications are well positioned to take advantage of this flexible and powerful accessibility option.
ASPs offer interesting financing alternatives, in that they partner with various SAP technology partners to make leasing, pay-as-you-go, and other payment methods available.
The ASP provider market shrank over the last few years. The mySAP-focused companies that weathered these hard times seem even better prepared and well-positioned to host SAP solutions, however.Security Considerations
I know of no company that does not envision protecting its corporate computing assets. From a solution-stack security perspective, not all software vendors are created equal, however. Oracle touts its unbreakable database, UNIX vendors tout the robust security features of their operating environments, and so on. In my eyes, security features are very important, but good security is more often about managing and testing changes to a solution stack, by carefully identifying security holes and other weaknesses in new solution stack components before these components ever find themselves in Production.
However, companies that embrace and act upon the idea of protecting computing assets will prove to be better partners in the long run. This is why I believe that Oracle's focus on security will pay big dividends in terms of slowing the adoption of competing databases. And it is why I believe that the Trusted PC joint Intel, AMD, and Microsoft vision (once labeled by Microsoft as Palladium, and now referred to as the "next-generation secure computing base for Windows") will prove fruitful as well. Its goal is to build security into servers and PCs at a microprocessor level. New initiatives coming out of the Trusted Computing Platform Alliance promise to better secure our processing platforms, ensuring that only authorized applications and program executables can ever be executed by the system, and that all data housed on the system is encrypted so that it is useless to others. To this end, Microsoft considers Trusted PC a significant part of its Trustworthy Computing strategy—we should see something commercially available in this regard by 2004 that applies to server as well as desktop and other computing platforms.Manageability Considerations
No customers of mine have ever started their initial SAP implementation planning discussions with me by saying:"George, all that high-availability and performance stuff is fine, but what we really want is a nice manageable system. Can you do that for us?"
By the time Go-Live looms just over the horizon, though, every single one of them—without exception—has indicated a growing concern for manageability. Sure, it's there on the project plan, and any number of products can be used to support managing your mySAP environment. But the whole field of manageability is more complex and more work than you would imagine. Consider the following:
Each layer in the SAP Solution Stack must be managed; the risk of not keeping an eye on a particular layer or solution component affects the uptime of the entire system.
Because each layer is so different from the others, it's nearly impossible to find a single management product that can actually monitor and report on more than a few layers, much less the entire stack.
Therefore, the next best thing becomes trying to find a product that can at least interoperate successfully with other products.
At the end of the day, three, four, or even more tools and utilities must ultimately be fused together to provide a holistic view of a mySAP solution stack. This is challenging, to say the least!
To learn exactly how challenging piecing together a management approach can be, see "Systems Management Techniques for SAP," p. 511 in Chapter 14.
Because of the challenges inherent to managing hardware and software products from a lot of different solution stack vendors, some of my customers have purposely chosen less than "best-of-breed" products for their SAP solutions, so as to minimize the number of software partners involved. Or they have decided to reduce the number of partners and vendors altogether by selecting one of the big enterprise hardware/services vendors. The obvious partners are clear—HP, IBM, and Sun. For example, if you go with HP and choose to implement an rp8400-based server platform with an HP StorageWorks SAN, running HP-UX 11i, and managed by HP OpenView, the challenges inherent to managing four different vendors' products just dropped tremendously. Similar arguments could be made for going with an IBM or Sun solution stack, too—IBM even throws a couple of databases into the mix.The System Landscape and Accessibility
The last area I want to cover with regard to solution vision and the SAP system landscape is accessibility. Many companies over the last three or four years have started with a vision of dumping all application-specific interfaces in favor of browser-enabled solutions, so as to ease the burdens and costs associated with desktop/laptop management while opening up new accessibility approaches like hand-helds and other wireless devices. SAP has supported that vision since 1996, with the advent of Internet connectivity in R/3 3.1G. But only in the last few years have I really seen this take off.
SAP AG offers quite a few accessibility options today when it comes to mySAP solutions. The classic SAPGUI and its revamped and more capable EnjoySAP SAPGUI represent one end of the spectrum. This approach is safe, very mainstream, and very easy to implement. And the SAPGUI we have today is extremely comprehensive, supporting all mySAP components through a single interface, which is unlike the approach a few years ago where each so-called "New Dimension" product like BW or APO required its own GUI. But the SAPGUI still represents a typical application-specific approach to accessibility; each end user installs the client on their desktop or laptop, or runs the SAPGUI from a network share, and off they go.
Other accessibility approaches are available, however, as you see in Figure 3.6. The original WebGUI, for example, is based on HTML and provides connectivity via Microsoft's Internet Explorer and so on. And a more recent addition, the JavaGUI, allows native Java-based access to SAP. Both of these approaches fulfill an Internet-based approach to connectivity, and subsequently simplify the desktop (assuming Internet connectivity is a standard desktop offering at your particular company, of course).
Figure 3.6 Access to mySAP solutions is quite varied today, ranging from classic and updated SAPGUI options to newer Web-enabled versions.
New HP Haven Offering, Powered by HP Vertica and Innovative Open Source Distributed R, Greatly Accelerates Processing Performance and Extends Power of Predictive Analytics to Much Larger Community
SAN JOSE, CA--(Marketwired - Feb 17, 2015) - (Strata + Hadoop World) -- HP (NYSE: HPQ) today unveiled HP Haven Predictive Analytics, a new offering that accelerates and operationalizes large-scale machine learning and statistical analysis, and ultimately provides organizations with much deeper insights and understanding into today's rapidly evolving data volumes.
Powered by HP's innovative Distributed R offering, the new release dramatically improves performance and enables users to analyze much larger data sets than was previously possible with the popular R statistical programing language. Available now at http://www.vertica.com/distributedr, the new offering includes the following key components and capabilities:
"HP Haven Predictive Analytics provides the scale and performance to Cerner to achieve predictive analytics health care solutions that were not possible before," said Dr. Doug McNair, M.D., PhD, senior vice president at Cerner Corporation (@Cerner). "The Distributed R technology is vital for Cerner's discovery activities, which we conduct for Cerner's health care clients around the world. In health care use cases, the most valuable item sets are rare. Therefore, coverage of the entire corpus of records is often essential to avoid false-negative results and to ensure model stability. HP Haven Predictive Analytics is a strategic enabler for Cerner."
Predictive Analytics, Built for Big Data The open source R language is used by millions of data scientists around the globe to interpret, interact with, and visualize data, and has been a powerful tool in tackling predictive modeling tasks such as drug discovery and financial modeling. Unfortunately, due to its inherent design, it has been challenged to process large data sets.
To overcome this limitation, HP Labs (@hplabs) and HP Software (@HPSoftware) developed Distributed R, a revolutionary extension of R, which boosts performance by splitting tasks between multiple processing nodes. The result of this strategic initiative is the industry's first open source version of a distributed platform for R that is explicitly designed to address today's demanding Big Data predictive analytic tasks.
Now the global developer community can employ R to scale for billions of records of data -- an order of magnitude improvement over traditional R-based performance. HP Haven Predictive Analytics also retains the flexibility and consistency with R and enables data scientists to use their familiar R console and RStudio to work with Distributed R.
"HP Haven Predictive Analytics delivers the industry's first open, high-performance platform based on R, seamlessly integrated with the HP Haven Big Data Platform," says Shilpa Lawande (@slawande), GM Platform, HP Software Big Data Business Unit. "Now, organizations can unlock the untapped value of Big Data with scalable predictive analytics to address every use case -- from customer acquisition and retention to fraud detection to predictive maintenance and many more."
Pricing and Availability HP Haven Predictive Analytics is free open-source software and is backed by award winning HP global enterprise support, which helps organizations realize the full value of their investment in Big Data analytics. This optional support offering is priced per node up to 5 nodes with attractive discount pricing available for larger deployments. More information about HP Haven Predictive Analytics is available at http://www.vertica.com/distributedr.
Additional Information The new product is available immediately. For information on a recent Distributed R workshop, see: http://www.vertica.com/2015/01/22/workshop-on-distributed-computing-in-r/.
Join HP Software on Linkedin and follow @HPSoftware and @HPVertica on Twitter.
About HP HP creates new possibilities for technology to have a meaningful impact on people, businesses, governments and society. With the broadest technology portfolio spanning printing, personal systems, software, services and IT infrastructure, HP delivers solutions for customers' most complex challenges in every region of the world. More information about HP is available at http://www.hp.com.
This media advisory contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If such risks or uncertainties materialize or such assumptions prove incorrect, the results of HP and its consolidated subsidiaries could differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including but not limited to statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements concerning expected development, performance, market share or competitive performance relating to products and services; any statements regarding anticipated operational and financial results; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Risks, uncertainties and assumptions include the need to address the many challenges facing HP's businesses; the competitive pressures faced by HP's businesses; risks associated with executing HP's strategy and plans for future operations; the impact of macroeconomic and geopolitical trends and events; the need to manage third-party suppliers and the distribution of HP's products and services effectively; the protection of HP's intellectual property assets, including intellectual property licensed from third parties; risks associated with HP's international operations; the development and transition of new products and services and the enhancement of existing products and services to meet customer needs and respond to emerging technological trends; the execution and performance of contracts by HP and its suppliers, customers, clients and partners; the hiring and retention of key employees; integration and other risks associated with business combination and investment transactions; the execution, timing and results of restructuring plans, including estimates and assumptions related to the cost and the anticipated benefits of implementing those plans; the resolution of pending investigations, claims and disputes; and other risks that are described in HP's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, and that are otherwise described or updated from time to time in HP's Securities and Exchange Commission reports. HP assumes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.
© 2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The only warranties for HP products and services are set forth in the express warranty statements accompanying such products and services. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an additional warranty. HP shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein.
ALISO VIEJO, Calif., Feb. 15, 2007 (PRIME NEWSWIRE) -- QLogic Corp. (Nasdaq:QLGC), the leader in Fibre Channel host bus adapters (HBAs), stackable switches and blade server switches, today announced that its SANblade(r) 4Gb Fibre Channel 2460 Series PCI Express (PCIe) host bus adapters (HBAs) are now available on the new HP Integrity rx2660 entry level servers.
With a line of QLogic(r) 4Gb Fibre Channel PCI-X 2.0 HBAs for HP Integrity servers already shipping, the addition of SANblade 4Gb PCIe HBAs round out the SAN connectivity solutions for HP business critical systems. The SANblade 2460 Series is fully compatible with all other QLogic HBAs and QMH2462 mezzanine cards, which now include HP-UX support, resulting in easy implementation in Fortune 500 and Global 2000 enterprises.
"QLogic has been delivering Fibre Channel HBAs for HP enterprise customers for two generations," said Roger Klein, vice president and general manager, QLogic Computer Systems Group. "This latest offering maintains our tradition of designing solutions that function effectively across multiple operating systems, simplifying infrastructure manageability and lowering costs for Global 2000 companies."
"Synchronicity between storage and server environments is a crucial element of mission-critical computing," said Michelle Weiss, vice president of marketing, Business Critical Systems, HP. "The combination of QLogic Fibre Channel HBAs and HP Integrity servers offers customers a highly reliable, high-performance Fibre Channel connectivity solution."
SANblade 2460 Series- the Right HBA for the Enterprise
The SANblade 2460 Series is the industry's first family of true enterprise-class 4Gb Fibre Channel PCI Express HBAs, delivering unprecedented levels of performance and availability, as well as intelligent networking features specific to enterprise class data centers. Qualified with HP Integrity rx6600 and rx3600 servers in HP-UX, Windows, Linux and OpenVMS environments, the SANblade 2460 Series provides increased data protection, advanced frame routing, and enterprise-wide management capabilities.
QLogic 4Gb Solutions for HP Integrity BL860c Server Blades
The performance-leading QLogic QMH2462 is the only mezzanine card available for Windows, Linux and HP-UX for all HP blade servers including the c-Class BladeSystem BL460c, BL480c and the new HP Integrity BL860c. The QLogic QMH2462 is fully compatible with all 4Gb and 2Gb QLogic based PCIe and PCI-X HBAs, allowing seamless integration into large enterprises.
QLogic is a leading supplier of high performance storage networking solutions including Fibre Channel host bus adapters (HBAs), blade server embedded Fibre Channel switches, Fibre Channel stackable switches, iSCSI HBAs, iSCSI routers and storage services platforms for enabling advanced storage management applications. The company is also a leading supplier of server networking products including InfiniBand host channel adapters that accelerate cluster performance. QLogic products are delivered to small-to-medium businesses and large enterprises around the world via its channel partner community. QLogic products are also powering solutions from leading companies like Cisco, Dell, EMC, Hitachi Data Systems, HP, IBM, NEC, Network Appliance and Sun Microsystems. QLogic is a member of the S&P 500 Index. For more information go to www.qlogic.com.
Note: All QLogic-issued press releases appear on the Company's website (www.qlogic.com). Any announcement that does not appear on the QLogic website has not been issued by QLogic.
Disclaimer - Forward Looking Statements
This press release contains statements relating to future results of the Company (including certain beliefs and projections regarding business trends) that are "forward-looking statements" as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or implied in the forward-looking statements. The Company advises readers that these potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: potential fluctuations in operating results; gross margins that may vary over time; revenues may be affected by changes in IT spending levels; the stock price of the Company may be volatile; the Company's dependence on the storage area network market; the ability to maintain and gain market or industry acceptance of the Company's products; the Company's dependence on a limited number of customers; seasonal fluctuations and uneven sales patterns in orders from customers; the Company's ability to compete effectively with other companies; declining average unit sales prices of comparable products; a reduction in sales efforts by current distributors; dependence on sole source and limited source suppliers; the Company's dependence on relationships with certain silicon chip suppliers; the complexity of the Company's products; sales fluctuations arising from customer transitions to new products; the uncertainty associated with SOX 404 compliance; environmental compliance costs; terrorist activities and resulting military actions; international economic, regulatory, political and other risks; uncertain benefits from strategic business combinations; the ability to attract and retain key personnel; recognition of compensation expense related to employee stock options and the Company's employee stock purchase plan; the decreased effectiveness of equity compensation; difficulties in implementing smaller geometry process technologies; the ability to protect proprietary rights; the ability to satisfactorily resolve any infringement claims; reliance on third party licenses; the use of "open source" software in our products; changes in our tax provisions or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income tax returns; computer viruses and other tampering with the Company's computer systems; and facilities of the Company and its suppliers and customers are located in areas subject to natural disasters. More detailed information on these and additional factors which could affect the Company's operating and financial results are described in the Company's Forms 10-K, 10-Q and other reports filed, or to be filed, with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company urges all interested parties to read these reports to gain a better understanding of the many business and other risks that the Company faces. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made only as of the date hereof, and the Company does not intend to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. QLogic and the QLogic logo are registered trademarks of QLogic Corporation. SANblade is a registered trademark in the United States. Other trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of the companies with which they are associated.QLogic Corporation Editors: Frank Berry 949/389-6499 email@example.com Investors: Tony Massetti 949/389-7533 firstname.lastname@example.org
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11907267
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11907279
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-29V
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12884854
Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/12/pass4sure-hp0-j45-designing-and.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/LookAtTheseHp0-j45RealQuestionAndAnswers
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/7kmcqx68kxb9rhf5zrp0vxtqx5lolmq6