|Exam Name||:||NonStop Remote Database Facility (RDF)|
|Questions and Answers||:||154 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||April 22, 2019|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||Pass4sure HP0-782 Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure HP0-782 Full Version|
Exam Questions Updated On :
Its right to study books for HP0-782 exam, but make sure your fulfillment with those Q&A.
I got seventy nine% in HP0-782 exam. Your test material became very helpful. A large thank you kilexams!
HP0-782 exam is not any more hard with those QAs.
i am very satisfied with this bundle as I were given over 96% on this HP0-782 exam. I study the professional HP0-782 manual a bit, however I bet killexams.com changed into my primary coaching useful resource. I memorized most of the questions and answers, and also invested the time to in reality recognize the eventualities and tech/practice centeredparts of the exam. I suppose that by way of itself purchasing the killexams.com package does now not guarantee that you maypass your exam - and a few test are really tough. but, in case you test their materials hard and in reality positioned your thoughts and your heart into your exam guidance, then killexams.com certainly beats some otherexam prep options available out there.
Dont forget about to strive those real exam questions questions for HP0-782 examination.
I wound up the exam with a satisfying 84% marks in stipulated time. Thanks very much killexams. By and by, it was difficult to do top to bottom study proceeding with a full-time work. At that point, I turned to the Q&A of killexams. Its concise answers helped me to see some intricate subjects. I chose to sit for the exam HP0-782 to attain further advancement in my profession.
observed an accurate source for real HP0-782 dumps.
I have been so susceptible my entire way yet I know now that I had to get a skip in my HP0-782 and this can make me popular probable and yes I am quick of radiance but passing my exams and solved nearly all questions in just 75 minutes with killexams.com dumps. A couple of splendid guys cant bring a alternate to planets manner but they can just permit you to recognize whether or not youve got been the principle fellow who knew a way to try this and I want to be acknowledged on this global and make my personal precise imprint.
Unbelieveable! however right source modern day HP0-782 real test questions.
I need to admit, deciding on killexams.com was the subsequent wise selection I took after choosing the HP0-782 exam. The patterns and questions are so nicely spread which permits person raise their bar by the time they reach the ultimate simulation exam. admire the efforts and honest thank you for supporting skip the exam. keep up the best work. thank you killexams.
How long prep is needed to pass HP0-782 exam?
its miles approximately new HP0-782 exam. i bought this HP0-782 braindump before I heard of update so I concept I had spent money on some thing i might now not be capable of use. I contacted killexams.com help staff to double test, and they instructed me the HP0-782 exam have been up to date recently. As I checked it in opposition to the modern-day HP0-782 exam targets it truely looks up to date. numerous questions were brought compared to older braindumps and all areas blanketed. I am inspired with their efficiency and customer support. looking ahead to taking my HP0-782 exam in 2 weeks.
i've discovered a very good source modern day HP0-782 cloth.
I am one a number of the excessive achiever within the HP0-782 exam. What a outstanding Q&a material they supplied. Within a short time I grasped everything on all the relevant subjects. It turned into genuinely extremely good! I suffered plenty even as getting ready for my previous try, but this time I cleared my exam very without difficulty with out anxiety and issues. Its farhonestly admirable getting to know journey for me. Thank you masses killexams.com for the real resource.
I located all my efforts on net and positioned killexams HP0-782 actual exam bank.
Like many others, i have currently passed the HP0-782 exam. In my case, extensive majority of HP0-782 exam questions got hereexactly from this manual. The answers are correct, too, so if you are making ready to take your HP0-782 exam, you cancompletely rely upon this net site.
Unbelieveable! but authentic source modern-day HP0-782 real test questions.
Ive presently passed the HP0-782 exam with this package deal. This is a splendid answer in case you need a short butdependable practise for HP0-782 exam. That is a professional degree, so assume which you nevertheless want to spend time playing with Q&A - realistic experience is prime. But, as a protracted way and exam simulations go, killexams.com is the winner. Their trying out engine actually simulates the exam, which includes the particular query sorts. It does make subjects less complicated, and in my case, I take delivery of as actual with it contributed to me getting a 100% score! I couldnt trust my eyes! I knew I did nicely, however this became a wonder!!
Take a smart circulate, attain these HP0-782 questions and answers.
I cleared HP0-782 exam with high marks. Every time I had registered with killexams.com which helped me to score more marks. Its great to have help of killexams.com question bank for such type of exams. Thanks to all.
PALO ALTO, Calif.--(business WIRE)--HP (NYSE:HPQ) today announced the launch of Paul McCartney’s private cloud-based mostly digital library.
The HP answer gives MPL Communications, Ltd. with speedy entry to its distinctive media assets on an HP Converged Infrastructure in a position for future increase.
McCartney’s collection presently includes more than 1 million gadgets, including pictures; video footage from reside concert events; rolls of movie, videotapes and reels; track recordings; long-established works of art; as well as memorabilia. With HP, McCartney’s own belongings at the moment are digitized.
HP commercial enterprise features consultants worked with MPL Communications, Ltd. to plot, advance, integrate and verify the library. The library is developed on an HP Converged Infrastructure, in line with modular building blocks of HP servers, storage, networking and management utility. The belongings are housed in a personal cloud managed from HP commercial facts centers.
buyers these days demand instant entry, the use of a myriad of gadgets, from any location, at any time. With MPL Communications, Ltd.’s former know-how infrastructure, discovering selected property from McCartney’s assortment may be a fancy and time-drinking procedure. HP information Optimization options give an optimized repository of the content, permitting the firm to be faster, nimbler and smarter by gaining entry to the correct counsel when it is needed.
“It’s actually pleasing as a result of although I’m out on tour anyplace on earth, I may be capable of say, k, ‘Wings 1976 tour’ and straight, it's going to come up. You’ve got all the advice, all the photos from it. and also you’ll have written money owed – personal accounts and important bills – of what took place,” said McCartney.
“Working with MPL Communications, Ltd., we're demonstrating how an rapid-On track organization can also be carried out to create, control and distribute enticing content material to an more and more related world,” talked about Jan Zadak, government vp, enterprise sales and advertising, HP. “here is an exciting experience as we continue to work carefully with Paul McCartney to develop know-how options with a purpose to retain and lengthen his legacy.”
HP Hybrid birth
HP designed a Hybrid start solution for MPL Communications, Ltd. that incorporates an off-premise, cloud-based mannequin, mixed with the company’s redesigned and multiplied on-premise IT infrastructure. MPL Communications, Ltd.’s refreshed facts middle infrastructure contains HP BladeSystem Matrix, HP ProLiant servers, HP StorageWorks and HP Networking options as its core groundwork.
This solution provides MPL Communications, Ltd. the flexibility required to cope with its rapidly expanding library and to make certain the security of McCartney’s useful property. MPL Communications, Ltd. will house a duplicate locally of the digital library to reduce the firm’s dependence on the velocity of the local telecommunication system to add or download belongings from the inner most cloud. HP will maintain a redundant equipment in a remote data facility, with a full replication of the digital library.
The private cloud makes it possible for MPL Communications, Ltd. to lengthen its enterprise operations beyond its facts center in London and protects the library from the chance of natural catastrophe or sudden downtime.
conserving and optimizing precious property
HP enterprise protection consultants assessed the library’s safety needs and developed an answer to give protection to the assets at every stage of their use. The answer addresses strict safety necessities across the entire infrastructure, including utility safety, advice security, and id and access administration.
HP facts Protector and HP Database Archiving utility reduce the need for duplication of existing library files and storage capability.
Paul McCartney to headline at HP find Americas
Attendees at HP discover Americas, HP’s ideal customer event, will get a firsthand view into the collaboration between HP and MPL Communications, Ltd. with Paul McCartney headlining on the experience’s closing ceremonies.
greater tips about MPL Communications, Ltd. and its speedy-On adventure, as well as entry to movies and details on the digital library is accessible at www.hp.com/go/mccartney.
HP creates new chances for expertise to have a meaningful affect on people, groups, governments and society. the area’s greatest expertise company, HP brings collectively a portfolio that spans printing, very own computing, application, capabilities and IT infrastructure on the convergence of the cloud and connectivity, creating seamless, cozy, context-mindful experiences for a connected world. more counsel about HP is accessible at http://www.hp.com.
This news free up includes ahead-searching statements that contain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If such dangers or uncertainties materialize or such assumptions show fallacious, the results of HP and its consolidated subsidiaries might range materially from those expressed or implied by such ahead-looking statements and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical reality are statements that could be deemed ahead-searching statements, together with however no longer constrained to statements of the plans, options and aims of administration for future operations; any statements regarding expected construction, efficiency or market share regarding items and functions; any statements involving anticipated operational and monetary consequences; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. risks, uncertainties and assumptions include macroeconomic and geopolitical traits and events; the aggressive pressures faced with the aid of HP’s agencies; the development and transition of new items and capabilities (and the enhancement of current items and capabilities) to fulfill consumer wants and reply to emerging technological developments; the execution and efficiency of contracts by means of HP and its valued clientele, suppliers and partners; the achievement of anticipated operational and fiscal consequences; and different dangers that are described in HP’s Quarterly file on form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2011 and HP’s different filings with the Securities and alternate commission, together with but not restrained to HP’s Annual document on kind 10-k for the fiscal 12 months ended October 31, 2010. HP assumes no duty and does not intend to update these ahead-searching statements.
© 2011 Hewlett-Packard building company, L.P. The advice contained herein is subject to trade with out be aware. The only warranties for HP items and features are set forth in the express assurance statements accompanying such items and features. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an extra assurance. HP shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein.
The LHC isn't with no trouble the strongest particle accelerator ever created. dealing with the big quantities of records it produces has required the creation of 1 of the greatest desktop grids on this planet. The planning and testing of the compute facilities has been taking location for years, nevertheless it's just recently that the grid has had to contend with the output from specific collisions. How did it do? "From the IT perspective, we failed to be aware when the beams got here on," referred to CERN's Wolfgang von Rueden, "We had validated it with a great deal better throughput circumstances."
nonetheless, not every little thing is working reasonably in response to plan. von Rueden pointed out that the initial expectations for the LHC's computing grid had anticipated lower network efficiency and a reliance on tape; in its place, the community has made it more convenient to shuffle tremendous facts units between compute facilities, and the expense and performance of complicated drives have grew to become out superior than anticipated. Von Rueden gave us a short overview of the computing setup at CERN, what they've learned from inserting every little thing in location for the LHC, and how some essential agencies are relying on CERN's event to increase their products.moving statistics
although CERN has some huge computing supplies, they make a contribution handiest about 10-15 percent of the whole CPU power committed to the records coming out of the LHC, and lots of the work on-web site is committed to cutting down on the statistics that must be kept. The LHC produces way more records than we will perhaps keep, and many of the collisions produce a twig of mundane particles we're already privy to. a big amount of computing vigor—about 2,000 CPUs at each of the 4 detectors—is dedicated to filtering the interesting collisions out of the background.
(One physicist in comparison this procedure to identifying traffic accidents when given footage of an intersection the place the site visitors light adjustments shades tens of millions of times between incidents.)
The filtering reduces the circulate of facts from a petabyte (PB) a 2d to a gigabyte per 2d, which is then transferred from the detectors to the leading compute facility via a dedicated 10Gbps connection. once there, it needs to be saved, and von Rueden told us that the preliminary plan had been to use tape for that; at the moment, they've about 50PB of tape storage, dealt with by means of a group of robotic storage hardware. nonetheless, they've been discovering that disk storage is working well, and have scaled that up to 20PB value of storage.
The disks are managed as a cloud carrier, with arrays of drives connected to Linux containers in JBOD (only a Bunch Of Disks) mode. each of those containers gets a 1Gbps connection, and any CPU within the storage cluster can study information from any of the disks.
one of the most causes for the expanded reliance on disks is the network that connects the international grid to CERN. "because the networking is going so neatly, filling the pipes can outrun tapes," von Rueden advised Ars. at this time, that community is working at 10 times its planned ability, with eleven committed connections operating at 10Gbps, and yet another two held in reserve. every connection goes to considered one of a sequence of what are known as Tier 1 sites, the place the facts is replicated and dispensed to Tier 2 sites for analysis. Von Rueden noted that the fiber that powers this setup has been "faster, more affordable, and greater professional than in planning."
The original plan had been that each and every of the Tier 2 websites would preserve a selected subset of the LHC facts, and analysis jobs (which, being code, should be quite compact) can be despatched across the community to at any place the data resides. in its place, it be grew to become out that the community performs so neatly that the information may also be streamed anyplace on the grid in actual time, which has made things enormously greater bendy.supporting clients and groups
besides the fact that children the LHC's computing needs are fairly interesting, CERN's IT body of workers faces issues that would sound customary to any person in company IT. Its datacenter is 35 years old, and is now hosting clusters in a space that was intended to aid supercomputers. Von Rueden pointed out that density is becoming a problem, and the constructing is never designed to take expertise of environmental functions or do anything with its waste heat. however there are some fixes that can also be utilized—a few racks of essential gadget in the datacenter at the moment are water cooled—many of the focal point for CERN has been on getting probably the most performance per Watt used for computing.
In fresh years, advancements in that area have come speedy enough that CERN not bothers with hardware help contracts longer than three years. Machines simply get run except they are useless; the cost of the substitute, and the energy discount rates substitute hardware brings, means it does not make economic experience to retain the hardware going.
beyond the hardware, CERN has to provide guide to a extremely different user neighborhood, as physicists frequently come to the site with their own desktop, and many of them run what von Rueden known as "non-mainstream platforms." It runs a huge wireless network, and has to supply features for company, from members of the clicking to dignitaries. right now, CERN servers assist over 20,000 e-mail clients, and provide faraway access to information and the interior network for many users.
mixed with the LHC's unique computing needs, all of this makes CERN an excellent testbed for a lot of technology groups. CERN runs a couple of informal collaborations with industry however, for its IT problems, corporations are encouraged to take half within the openlab program, which von Rueden runs. presently, HP, Intel, Oracle, and Siemens all have openlab tasks, wherein they pay for dedicated body of workers at CERN and coordinate their work with their own employees.
Siemens, for instance, is making an attempt to find out how to more advantageous deploy and manage computerized manage techniques, while HP's ProCurve group is trying to study from CERN's means to control a heterogeneous and relatively open desktop community. at the stage of user and visitor networking, CERN is fairly liberal in regards to the hardware it lets onto the system, which potential it has to have application that can notice odd conduct and disconnect any contraptions affected by it; HP is calling at building some of those network management points into its items.
CERN shops metadata for the collision routine in an Oracle database, and a huge requirement here—quick synchronization across a global community—has caused Oracle to launch an openlab project wherein it assessments a lot of streaming and compression schemes to up efficiency over the network. eventually, Intel exams compiler technology the use of one of the vital excessive-performance computing projects required at CERN, tests its processors under actual-world hundreds, and sponsors individuals who are converting some physics workloads and code libraries to assist the multithreading crucial to take skills of the latest generation of processors.
Most corporations might not face concerns on the identical scale that CERN does (or be fortunate sufficient to have their plans outperform expectations. but there are a lot a good way to probably improvement from some of the expertise being developed there. CERN's personal clients will as neatly, however they tend to be a choosy bunch. "whatever you can give a physicist," von Rueden talked about, "he wants two instances as a lot."
checklist picture by way of A robot manages some of CERN's 50PB of tape storage.
Whilst it is very hard task to choose reliable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people get ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com make it certain to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. We never compromise on our review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self confidence is important to all of us. Specially we manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you see any bogus report posted by our competitor with the name killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just keep in mind that there are always bad people damaging reputation of good services due to their benefits. There are a large number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our test questions and sample brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
HPE0-J76 cheat sheets | HP0-S27 Practice test | 650-328 sample test | 200-530 bootcamp | 000-M01 brain dumps | F50-515 practice test | 1Z0-573 cram | 000-M74 real questions | 920-257 test questions | 9L0-412 VCE | AZ-300 mock exam | ACNP questions and answers | 9L0-521 dumps questions | HP2-K19 pdf download | 000-552 examcollection | HP2-K18 questions and answers | 000-563 practice questions | 98-366 free pdf | 351-001 braindumps | 9A0-063 dumps |
Individuals utilized these HP dumps to get 100% marks
If are you confused how to pass your HP HP0-782 Exam? With the help of the verified killexams.com HP HP0-782 Testing Engine you will learn how to increase your skills. The majority of the students start figuring out when they find out that they have to appear in IT certification. Our brain dumps are comprehensive and to the point. The HP HP0-782 PDF files make your vision vast and help you a lot in preparation of the certification exam.
If you are inquisitive about passing the HP HP0-782 exam to begin earning? killexams.com has forefront developed NonStop Remote Database Facility (RDF) test questions that will make sure you pass this HP0-782 exam! killexams.com delivers you the foremost correct, current and latest updated HP0-782 exam questions and out there with a 100 percent refund guarantee. There are several firms that offer HP0-782 brain dumps however those are not correct and latest ones. Preparation with killexams.com HP0-782 new questions will be a best thing to pass HP0-782 exam in straight forward means. We are all cognizant that a significant drawback within the IT business is there's an absence of quality study dumps. Our test preparation dumps provides you everything you will have to be compelled to take a certification test. Our HP HP0-782 exam offers you with test questions with verified answers that replicate the actual test. These Questions and Answers offer you with the expertise of taking the particular exam. prime quality and worth for the HP0-782 exam. 100% guarantee to pass your HP HP0-782 exam and acquire your HP certification. We have a tendency at killexams.com are committed to assist you pass your HP0-782 exam with high scores. The probabilities of you failing your HP0-782 exam, once memorizing our comprehensive brain dumps are little. HP HP0-782 is rare all round the globe, and also the business and programming arrangements gave by them are being grasped by each one of the organizations. They need help in driving an outsized range of organizations on the far side any doubt. So much reaching learning of HP0-782 eam are viewed as a vital capability, and also the specialists certified by them are exceptionally prestigious altogether associations.
At killexams.com, we give verified on HP HP0-782 real exam questions the best to pass HP0-782 test, and to get certified by HP. It is a best decision to quicken your vocation as an expert in the Information Technology industry. We are glad for our notoriety of helping individuals breeze through the HP0-782 test in their first endeavors. Our prosperity rates in the previous two years have been amazing, because of our glad clients currently ready to help their vocation in the fast track. killexams.com is the main decision among IT experts, particularly the ones hoping to ascend the pecking order levels speedier in their individual associations. HP is the business pioneer in data innovation, and getting certified by them is an ensured approach to prevail with IT vocations. We enable you to do precisely that with our amazing HP HP0-782 preparing materials.
HP HP0-782 is inescapable all around the globe, and the business and programming arrangements given by them are grasped by every one of the organizations. They have helped in driving a large number of organizations on the beyond any doubt shot way of achievement. Far reaching learning of HP items are required to affirm an essential capability, and the experts ensured by them are exceedingly esteemed in all associations.
We give genuine HP0-782 pdf exam inquiries and answers braindumps in two configurations. Download PDF and Practice Tests. Pass HP HP0-782 genuine Exam rapidly and effortlessly. The HP0-782 braindumps PDF compose is accessible for perusing and printing. You can print progressively and hone ordinarily. Our pass rate is high to 98.9% and the similitude rate between our HP0-782 study guide and genuine exam is 90% Considering our seven-year teaching background. Do you need accomplishments in the HP0-782 exam in only one attempt?
As the only thing important here is passing the HP0-782 - NonStop Remote Database Facility (RDF) exam. As all that you require is a high score of HP HP0-782 exam. The just a single thing you have to do is downloading braindumps of HP0-782 exam study aides now. We won't let you down, we will provide you real questions. The experts additionally keep pace with the most up and coming exam so as to give the larger part of updated materials. Three Months free access to have the capacity to them through the date of purchase. Each hopeful may bear the cost of the HP0-782 exam dumps by killexams.com at a low cost. Frequently rebate for anybody all.
Within the sight of the credible exam substance of the mind dumps at killexams.com you can undoubtedly build up your specialty. For the IT experts, it is fundamental to improve their aptitudes as per their vocation prerequisite. We make it simple for our clients to take certification exam with the assistance of killexams.com verified and bona fide exam material. For a brilliant future in its realm, our brain dumps are the best alternative.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
A best dumps composing is a critical component that makes it simple for you to take HP certifications. Yet, HP0-782 braindumps PDF offers accommodation for hopefuls. The IT certification is a significant troublesome assignment on the off chance that one doesn't discover legitimate direction as real asset material. Therefore, we have bona fide and updated substance for the readiness of accreditation exam.
Killexams 1Z0-966 questions and answers | Killexams 000-186 test prep | Killexams C2090-549 exam prep | Killexams COG-132 exam questions | Killexams COG-612 Practice Test | Killexams ST0-192 braindumps | Killexams MB7-638 study guide | Killexams 000-820 brain dumps | Killexams M2010-727 real questions | Killexams 352-001 free pdf | Killexams C2030-136 braindumps | Killexams ST0-135 pdf download | Killexams 650-987 practice questions | Killexams 70-741 cheat sheets | Killexams HP2-Z30 free pdf download | Killexams 1Z0-465 test prep | Killexams C2040-928 study guide | Killexams F50-531 bootcamp | Killexams 70-463 brain dumps | Killexams EE0-411 dumps questions |
Killexams 000-134 practice exam | Killexams EX0-003 braindumps | Killexams P2090-027 mock exam | Killexams 000-857 Practice test | Killexams NS0-131 questions and answers | Killexams JN0-201 study guide | Killexams HP0-Y13 examcollection | Killexams 310-084 free pdf | Killexams EC0-232 dumps | Killexams 000-713 sample test | Killexams 70-549-CSharp dumps questions | Killexams C2150-575 free pdf | Killexams 642-279 Practice Test | Killexams 3000-2 real questions | Killexams PCAT cram | Killexams FCGIT exam prep | Killexams A2010-578 test prep | Killexams 98-382 exam prep | Killexams 500-205 braindumps | Killexams E20-617 braindumps |
Dave Crocker is a principal with Brandenburg InternetWorking, a technology consultancy. A member of the ARPANET research community starting in 1972, Crocker’s work experience includes stints at the RAND Corporation, MCI Communications Corp, and Digital Equipment Corp. He is a 2004 recipient of the IEEE Internet Award for his work on e-mail. As a result of developing this piece, he has started the Web site emailhistory.org, to develop consensus views about milestones in the evolution of electronic mail.
Mail is a simple concept. An author writes a message, affixes a recipient’s address and gives this to a delivery service, which moves the message to the recipient who reads, replies, files or deletes the message.
In 1975, before the days of personal computers, a leading industry trade magazine, Datamation , envisioned the future of electronic mail with an editorial cartoon showing a man at a desk pointing to his “terminal.” The caption read, “This? Oh, this is the display for my electronic junk mail.”
Two years later, in 1977, the maturing e-mail industry got its first newsletter, “EMMS: Electronic Mail and Message Systems.” Then, in 1978, three years after Datamation published its editorial cartoon, I received what is widely acknowledged to have been the first spam message, sent over the ARPANET by Gary Thuerk, a marketer for my eventual employer Digital Equipment Corp. The message went to roughly 400 users, and the community was swift in denouncing this “flagrant violation of the use of ARPANET,” according to a blog post by ClariNet Communications Corp. founder and publisher Brad Templeton.
The evolution of electronic mail development is a story of collaboration filled with personalities, software systems and acronyms. My own involvement in the development of electronic mail began in 1972, shortly after Ray Tomlinson chose the “@” symbol to trigger his new mechanism for transmitting messages from one computer to another. E-mail had existed on individual machines at least from 1965, according to technologist Tom Van Vleck, who was working for MIT at the time. Tomlinson, however, was the first to connect machines. I was an undergraduate studying psychology at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) when the ARPANET research group in engineering hired me to do technical editing and user support.
While working on the ARPANET, I discovered the collaborative culture that became the foundation of today’s “open systems” practices. Ideas, documents and software were freely shared within this community, and anyone who wanted to learn and contribute could participate, including me — a psychology student who had never taken a programming course.
It helped that my brother, Steve, taught me computer programming when I was twelve. At the time, the conventional wisdom dictated that, in order to learn computer programming, one needed an advanced mathematics degree. Today, Steve is the board chair for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which coordinates the unique identifiers across the Internet. More significantly for the current narrative about the early days of the ARPANET, he established the collaborative tone and open availability of the Internet’s Request for Comments (RFC) technical document series, which remains, for many, a cornerstone of the Internet’s open culture.
I found e-mail to be a compelling technical sandbox. It provides opportunities for assisting group collaboration while presenting significant technical challenges. Designing a good user interface and crafting reliable, fast mail delivery require creative research and careful engineering. My first technical suggestions for e-mail were published as an RFC in 1973, a year after I started work on the ARPANET, and I was delighted to see my thoughts taken seriously by the community.
This led to my being asked to help with a two-year effort focused on resolving the confusion created by emerging, independent e-mail formats. The four-person project team, which included Ken Pogran, John Vittal and Austin Henderson, was tasked with developing a single standard. We were spread across the United States, each working at different companies, and we used e-mail itself as our discussion forum, often consulting others from the wider community.
We published the resulting technical specification in a 1977 RFC titled “Standard for the format of ARPA network text messages.” The document established what I believe was the first, formal standard for an e-mail object’s format — the message content itself. Although primarily codifying existing practice, we also seasoned the specification with a few extra features, such as distinguishing the author from the agent who posted the message and allowing a separate address for replies.
Between 1978 and 1982, I was a graduate student studying computer science at the University of Delaware. During that time, I developed the Multichannel Memorandum Distribution Facility (MMDF), a program for relaying e-mail among different kinds of networks, including via telephone calls. The program was eventually funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), as part of its CSNet initiative. CSNet extended the reach of the ARPANET/Internet to more computer science research and academic sites, and served as the forerunner to a larger NSF Internet project, NSFNet, which helped to formulate the distributed and independent ownership and administration of today’s Internet.
While users and developers of the original ARPANET were readying for the transition to the Internet’s technical infrastructure of today, I collaborated with the wider community again, to revise the format specification. This produced what I believe was the first “Internet” standard for electronic mail in 1982. The standard was developed in parallel with the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), which is responsible for moving these messages across the Internet. The standard has been revised twice since then in order to refine language, remove obsolete sections and conservatively add improvements. Over the years, individuals and committees have added mechanisms for remote access and group discussion services (mailing lists), as well as improving capabilities for managing e-mail services and more. This tradition of selective increments, which preserves a stable operational base and therefore the user environment, has been a hallmark of Internet technical development.
By 1989, the Internet was expanding into the commercial sector, including the addition of connections to commercial electronic mail services, such as MCI Mail, OnTyme, Telemail and Compuserve. The connection to MCI, whose e-mail service I helped create, used an enhanced version of my “MMDF” system.
In spite of the changes over the years, an e-mail from the early 1970s is very similar to what we see in messages sent today. Those messages also contained “from,” “to,” “cc,” “bcc,” “subject” and “date.” However, in the 1970’s, messages were strictly text. Today, they can include pictures, Web pages, music, video and more. While there were ad hoc methods for including these, a standard for it was not developed until the early 1990s — around the time the Internet went global.
Beyond the similarity of message appearance, even more remarkable is that the e-mail service we rely on today has been in continuous operation since those early days. There have been many incremental improvements, of course, but the basic service, allowing users to exchange mail across the extent of the ARPANET/Internet, has not been replaced or interrupted in 40 years. It simply grew from a couple hundred users to a couple billion.
Besides more users, there is also more mail per user. In the 1970s, it was extraordinary for a person to receive as many as 50 messages a day. Today, it’s not unheard of for an individual to receive 1,000 messages a day. Although basic e-mail requires only simple technology, it is challenging to scale e-mail and make it an essential service for a large pool of users. Doing this requires adding functionality, designing a good user interface (usability), and providing non-stop reliability while delivering messages quickly.
Today, the e-mail equivalent of the U.S. Postal Service is provided by independent, interconnected private providers, such as your Internet access service and your employer. The typical machines that are used often process many millions of messages per day, delivering these messages within minutes or seconds and suffering only a tiny fraction of failed deliveries.
In terms of core e-mail service, I find that the most difficult design work is in making user interfaces that are intuitive for long-term use with a large archive of messages, although spam and phishing have created their own, daunting engineering challenges.
Larry Roberts received many more messages than most during the early days of ARPANET. As head of the ARPA office overseeing computer research, including creation of the ARPANET, Roberts wrote a basic program called “RD,” which permitted the selective handling of individual messages. However the user’s burden of creating replies remained the same as the one needed to create an initial message.
John Vittal overcame this burden with a re-coded version of Robert’s program, which he called “MSG.” It included a command for replying to a message, similar to what is used today. My impression at the time was that, as soon as this command became widely available, e-mail use exploded. As one of MSG’s early users, I found that it permitted quick, convenient, and sustained conversations similar to the conversations we have come to expect over e-mail today.
By the mid-1970s, other user-oriented e-mail programs arrived on the scene. Two of the more popular examples were “Hermes,” at Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, now BBN – a wholly owned subsidiary of Raytheon — and “Laurel,” which was in use at Xerox PARC. “Laurel” is widely acknowledged within the tech community as the first graphically-oriented e-mail user interface. The program also had the split client/server mode in use today. During this time, Albert Vezza, formerly the associate director of MIT’s Laboratory for Computer Science and chairman of the World Wide Web Consortium, led his team at MIT in building a system that ran on top of a database engine. My own “MS” system was developed while I was at The RAND Corporation. The program was later, re-cast to “MH” by RAND’s Bruce Borden and further developed by Marshall Rose at the University of California, Irvine. “MH” became the most commonly used e-mail client software in the technical community and enhanced versions are still in use. While the role of these systems was to interact with users, “sendmail” was developed by Eric Allman at University of California-Berkeley, for providing transfer and delivery services similar to MMDF.
E-mail is the product of collaboration among many innovators, each incrementally advancing the technology. In my experience, I have seen no controversy about the nature or origins of e-mail prior to recent articles in Time and The Washington Post, and the Smithsonian National Museum of American History’s decision this past February to acquire documents relating to the creation of a more localized program called “EMAIL.”
The reports incorrectly credited its author, a 14-year old in the late 1970s, as the “inventor” of e-mail, long after it had become an established service on the ARPANET. He called his system “EMAIL” and later copyrighted the software. Unfortunately, the articles neglected the contributions of individuals widely regarded as the true e-mail inventors. Many are still active, some — too many to name — even took the time to review this piece. The Post has already acknowledged its error and I appreciate the publication’s affording me this opportunity to provide a personal account of that time and that community.
July 19, 2017 Alex Woodie
For many years, logical replication solutions were the only choice in the high availability product category for IBM i and its predecessor platforms. IBM’s introduction of PowerHA changed that, providing a dramatically different approach to achieving high availability. However, the vast majority of HA deployments in the IBM i market still use logical replication solutions. Which one is best suited for your needs? Hopefully this story will help you find the answer.
Logical replication solutions work by replicating changes made to database files and other IBM i objects in real time. The eight third-party products in this category – including HelpSystems‘ RobotHA, iSam Blue‘s iSB-HA, Maxava‘s Maxava HA, Rocket Software‘s Rocket iCluster, Shield Advanced Solutions HA4i, Trader’s Quick-EDD, and Vision Solutions‘ MIMIX Availability and ITERA Availability — essentially mirror the updates made to a production IBM i server to one or more secondary servers. In the event of an outage, the customer can initiate a role swap within their HA product, which turns the secondary system into the production system, enabling the customer to continue operations. That’s what they do, in a nutshell.
How do they work? Well, all logical replication solutions today use IBM‘s built-in database journaling function to detect changes made to database files. Before the advent of remote journaling, HA products employed a propriety “journal scrape” method to get the data out of the journals before sending it across the wire to the secondary server, where a journal apply process would be used to update the secondary database.
Today, the vast majority of new HA products use IBM’s remote journaling technology, which eliminates the need for the proprietary journal scrape and replication methodologies. When a database CRUD operation is made on the primary server and its database journal, the change is automatically reflected in the remote journal.
However, not all vendors use remote journaling. Trader’s avoids remote journaling because it says it makes it harder to determine the proper sequence to apply journal updates on the target machine. Vision Solutions, which is in the process of being acquired by (and changing its name to) Syncsort, still sells a version of its popular MIMIX software that doesn’t use remote journaling.Market Share
In terms of market presence, Vision Solutions dominates the HA market globally with a 25.9 percent share (according to HelpSystems 2017 IBM i Marketplace Study), thanks to its acquisitions of iTera and Lakeview Technology years ago. Trader’s, which reports solid growth in the United States through its business partner, BCS Group, is the two slot with an 8.0 percent share, followed by IBM’s PowerHA with 7.1 percent.
In fourth place with a 3.9 percent share is Maxava, which is one of the leaders in the growing HA cloud market. Rocket Software maintains a 2.4 percent share of the market with its iCluster product, which was originally developed by DataMirror. HelpSystems, which got into the business through its acquisition of the RSF-HA product from Bug Busters late last year, owns 1.1 percent of the market. Not listed on the HelpSystems report are iSam Blue, which also sells a modified version of that Bug Busters product, and Shield, which continues to develop and sell its budget-minded HA4i.Differentiation
The IBM i HA software business is a notoriously competitive one. It has spawned much drama and many lawsuits over the years as a result of vendors denigrating each other in marketing materials and in front of customers. For this reason, trying to differentiate and sort out the features and functions that matter most among the HA products is a complex task – not to mention a potentially hazardous one for editors who would like to maintain healthy working relationships with the vendors that they cover.
Because most HA products today use the same underlying replication method (except for Trader’s and sometimes Vision), the HA vendors largely look to other places to differentiate their offerings. Some of the areas where they’ve focused include:
T Jungle reached out to each of the logical replication software vendors plying the IBM i HA waters and asked them to complete a questionnaire about their offerings and their company. Each vendor was responsible for the accuracy of the information provided.
It’s our hope that this information will help IBM i professionals who are actively searching for a logical replication-based HA solution. Here are their responses, in alphabetical order by vendor name:HelpSystems
Year founded: 1982. RSF-HA first released in 2006
Name(s) of HA products: Robot HA
Total employee count: More than 500
Total number of company locations: More than 20
Number of company locations providing tech support: More than 20
Number of senior HA technical support employees: 12
Total number of HA customer implementations: 125
On-premise implementations: 95 percent
Cloud implementations: 5 percent and growing
Names of reference HA customers: Meridian IT
Names of regions/countries where you support HA customers: United States, United Kingdom, Germany
Number of HA resellers/business partners: 70
Prominent names of HA resellers/BPs: Prefer to not disclose
Number of MSP cloud partners for HA: “We are growing our partnerships with cloud MSPs”
Prominent names of MSP partners for HA: Prefer to not disclose
Price range for HA software license (1 source and 1 target): Starting less than $10k
Price range for HA implementation (service portion): Starting at $4,500 for Getting Started services. Additional services and training available as needed.
What features or capabilities uniquely differentiate your logical replication HA offering(s) for IBM i?
“HelpSystems provides the fastest, easiest, most affordable way for SMBs and enterprises to achieve high availability. Robot HA integrates with other products in the Robot suite for easier IBM i systems management. Our technical support team is excellent. Our professional services team, led by IBM HA expert Debbie Saugen, provides professional services including role swap assistance. We have an exceptionally strong relationship with IBM and we offer DRaaS.”iSamBlue
Year founded: 2008
Name(s) of HA products: iSB-HA
Total employee count: We use consultants so we don’t have to have a payroll
Total number of company locations: 2
Number of company locations providing tech support: 2
Number of senior HA technical support employees: We use consultants, but we have a minimum of one on 24x7x365
Total number of HA customer implementations: 40 licenses
On-premise implementations: We do not track
Cloud implementations: We do not track
Names of reference HA customers: Not provided
Names of regions/countries where you support HA customers: North America
Number of HA resellers/business partners: Our focus is on direct sales
Prominent names of HA resellers/BPs: Not provided
Number of MSP cloud partners for HA: Not provided
Prominent names of MSP partners for HA: Not provided
Price range for HA software license (1 source and 1 target): $10,000
Price range for HA implementation (service portion): $5,000
What features or capabilities uniquely differentiate your logical replication HA offering(s) for IBM i?
“iSam Blue, our customers, and partners have combined our talents, knowledge, and experiences to create one of the most advanced, yet easy to use HA products for the IBM i. Using single-step processes, we push the complexity that makes up HA, under the covers and present a user interface that is easy to understand, learn, and use. iSam Blue believes support is the life blood of HA. The key to support isn’t how many support people or locations you have. Outstanding support starts with products designed to be easy to use, understand, and [that] have a standard user interface. It includes having customers, with our help, do the installation as part of their training and developers that keep the same look and feel when adding features. The best support is “The support you’ll never need.” Our customers love knowing we are here, but they love not having to call support even more. iSam Blue understands that we must maximize our strengths and outperform the competition to survive and grow. Early on, we adopted ideas from the old iTera to “do whatever the customer needs.” Our size allows us the flexibility to listen to our customers and make improvements they suggest. We even make enhancements for single customers. If you measure your software on an ISV customer base, number of locations, or number of employees, then go with a big ISV. If you are looking for software that is innovative, ease to use, reliable, with an elevated level of autonomics and switch readiness, give iSam Blue a call today.”Maxava
Year founded: 2000
Name(s) of HA products: Maxava Datastream, SMB, and Enterprise Plus
Total employee count: 30
Total number of company locations: 5 physical offices – Philadelphia, London, Tokyo, Auckland, Wellington plus additional staff in Atlanta, California, Scotland, and Netherlands
Number of company locations providing tech support: 5 offices
Number of senior HA technical support employees: 10
Names of reference HA customers: hundreds of reference customers plus dozens of successful case studies online including Carhartt, Chilewich Sultan, Westpac Banking, CIMB, Maybank, Kim Lim Hai, and McGraw Hill Education
Names of regions/countries where you support HA customers: All regions
Number of HA resellers/business partners: 100
Prominent names of HA resellers/BPs: Sungard, Superion, MeridianIT, AS Networks, Dimension Data, and Computer Merchants
Number of MSP cloud partners for HA: more than 50
Prominent names of MSP partners for HA: Sungard, Superion, and MeridianIT
Price range for HA software license (1 source and 1 target): starting at $20k
Price range for HA implementation (service portion): basic starting at $10k
What features or capabilities uniquely differentiate your logical replication HA offering(s) for IBM i?
“Ready Day 1: Speedy implementation: runs on your current O/S; no new hardware or storage required. High Performance: limited production impact; multi-threaded IFS replication & audit; strictly uses IBM-approved transmission to eliminate latency; minimal bandwidth required. Maintain Order: command Intercept; in-sequence replication; no application locking. Data Accuracy: before & after matching; automated integrity checks; complete audit trails. Heavy Automation: constantly patrol for issues; automatic self-healing; reduced operator complexity. Total readiness: early problem detection; simulation and testing facilities; 24/7/365 standby support staff. Leading innovation: temporal table support; command scripting; CcapturePointRestore; Mi8 monitoring for IBM Power Systems. Future-Proof Solutions: “No Surprise” license models; shift between premise, cloud, and hybrid environments; migrate to new systems without downtime.”Rocket Software
Year founded: 1990
Name(s) of HA products: Rocket iCluster
Total employee count: 1400+
Total number of company locations: 30+
Number of company locations providing tech support: 4
Number of senior HA technical support employees: 10
Names of regions/countries where you support HA customers: Global (Rocket support is global)
Total number of HA customer implementations: not provided
On-premise implementations: not provided
Cloud implementations: not provided
Names of reference HA customers: not provided
Number of HA resellers/business partners: not provided
Prominent names of HA resellers/BPs: not provided
Number of MSP cloud partners for HA: not provided
Prominent names of MSP partners for HA: not provided
Price range for HA software license (1 source and 1 target): not provided
Price range for HA implementation (service portion): not provided
“We ensure uninterrupted access. The mission-critical business data and business applications run on your IBM i systems. Providing continuous access to these assets is essential for the business. Automating your high availability and disaster recovery management processes is one way to ensure uninterrupted access. Rocket iCluster is a high-availability and disaster recovery solution for business applications operating on IBM Power or IBM PureFlex systems running IBM i. iCluster enables continuous access through monitoring, notification and self-correcting replication issues. With iCluster, you can be proactive instead of reactive, saving precious time—and improving satisfaction for your users, customers and management. With the sophisticated features and ease of use of Rocket iCluster, you can help ensure that the business won’t ‘go offline.’ And you always know your recovery point and recovery time for high availability.
Rocket iCluster is easy to manage, administer and switch. It offers a cost-effective fee structure, licensed by physical server instead of number of logical systems or partitions (LPARs) or by number of users or CPU processors—with no extra charge within the same processor group, regardless of geographical location, and no transfer fees while under active maintenance. iCluster has all functionality you need in one product, with no modules.”Shield
Year founded: 1997
Name(s) of HA products: HA4i and JT4i
Total employee count: 5
Total number of company locations: 1
Number of company locations providing tech support: 1
Number of senior HA technical support employees: 1
Total number of HA customer implementations: 100
On-premise implementations: NA
Cloud implementations: 16
Names of reference HA customers: On request only
Names of regions/countries where you support HA customers: Europe and North America
Number of HA resellers/business partners: 5
Prominent names of HA resellers/BPs: NA
Number of MSP cloud partners for HA: 4
Prominent names of MSP partners for HA: NA
Price range for HA software license (1 source and 1 target): $8,000 to $60,000
Price range for HA implementation (service portion): Customer / BP install
Our products are built using the latest technology released from IBM, completely redesigned and re-written in the last three years with ILE/Service programs. They are easy to use, configure, and manage with built-in system monitors and email notifications. We offer low cost of ownership without sacrificing quality and functionality.Trader’s
Year founded: 1992
Total employee count: 42 in Europe and 280 worldwide
Total number of company locations: 5 in Europe and 50 worldwide
Number of company locations providing tech support: 4 in Europe and 15 worldwide
Number of senior HA technical support employees: 12 in France and 80 worldwide
Total number of HA customer implementations: 1,800 customers with about 7,000 implementations
On-premise implementations: 90%
Cloud implementations: 10%
Names of reference HA customers: Orange, Decathlon, Carrefour, Zodiac, Almerys, ABN AMRO, Air Liquide, Allianz, AON, Audemars-Piguet, Louis Vuitton, Cartier, BNP Paribas, Geodis, Cargill, Clarins, DGL, Dunlopillo, Ecco, Fuji, Hitachi, ING Bank, Iscar, Isuzu, Kuhn, Lease Plan, Longchamps, Maersk, Nippon Experss, Peugot MTC, Richemond, Ricoh, Sodebo, St. Dupont, St Allergenes, Suzuki, Toyota, V33, Vinci, Yamaha.
Regions/countries where you support HA customers: Global with main territories including Europe, North America, Asia and Japan
Number of HA resellers/business partners: 102
Prominent names of HA resellers/BPs: IBM – ATOS – BCS Group – Bitis (Japan) – QSL Northern Europe (Germany, UK, Benelux, and Nordics) – QSL Italia (Italy, Spain and Latin America)
Number of MSP cloud partners for HA: 22
Prominent names of MSP partners for HA: IBM – ATOS – CAP GEMINI – HCL – Abacus Solutions –Global IT – Logicalis – Software Information Systems – TurningPoint Systems
Price range for HA software license (1 source and 1 target): Based on IBM tier (Pxx Group) – starting at $9,000
Price range for HA implementation (service portion): Depends on complexity – starting at $3,500
What features or capabilities uniquely differentiate your logical replication HA offering(s) for IBM i?”Unique replication process applying updates on target with the proper sequence [as] it happened on source; auto repair with no penalty and outstanding performance; auto repair while active (allows to check-sync during production hours); jobs status replicated and managed to restarted during a failover; autonomics for triggers, constraints, and MQ Series; support for every enhancement in IBM i V7.3. Global non-stop production process allowing every type of replication and check-sync while users still work (system and application migration, maintenance HW and SW).Vision Solutions
Year founded: 1992
Name(s) of HA products: MIMIX AVAILABILITY, MIMIX DR, MIMIX MOVE; iTERA AVAILABILITY; OMS/ODS
Total employee count: 250
Total number of company locations: Americas: 5; EMEA: 3; AP: 2
Number of company locations providing tech support: 4
Number of senior HA technical support employees: 39
Total number of HA customer implementations: thousands
On-premise implementations: thousands
Cloud implementations: hundreds (managed)
Names of reference HA customers: Alfa Bank, Barona Resort and Casino, Boyd Gaming, DKSH, Fujitsu America, Heritage Bank, Krispy Kreme, National Distribution Alliance, OCBC Bank, ProHealth Care, Puregold Price Club, Southwestern Motor Transport, Staples, Takata, and Wimbledon
Names of regions/countries where you support HA customers: 70+ countries in the Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific regions
Number of HA resellers/business partners: hundreds
Prominent names of HA resellers/BPs: Agilysys, Fiserv, HMS, Jack Henry, IBM, Sirius, Avnet, GBM, and IBM
Number of MSP cloud partners for HA: Dozens of partners now have cloud and managed service offerings.
Prominent names of MSP partners for HA: Connectria, Corus360, Focal Point Solutions Group, IBM, Key Information Systems, MindSHIFT, ServIT, and Sirius
Price range for HA software license (1 source and 1 target): $5,000
Price range for HA implementation (service portion): $250/hour; packages available
What features or capabilities uniquely differentiate your logical replication HA offering(s) for IBM i? “Vision Solutions is the leading provider of business resilience solutions for IBM Power Systems. Backed by award-winning customer service, Vision has pioneered the use of logical replication software to address the high availability and disaster recovery needs of organizations of all sizes. Complete Protection: Protects all applications without modification; supports replication of SYSBAS and IASP objects; supports internal, external and mixed storage environments; enables replication between operating system levels; easily expands to multi-node topologies; audits and repairs live target objects to ensure successful switching; safeguards through scheduled and priority audits, and target-side monitoring; expands to support multiple HA/DR and data distribution servers with MIMIX Global; provides proven performance with minimal bandwidth usage; includes unparalleled apply performance for virtually zero apply lag.
It scales up to the largest enterprise environment; allows HA/DR testing without business impact with virtual switch; provides multiple initial sync options to preserve bandwidth; replicates less than one-half the volume of competing solutions; and gracefully recovers from network issues without requiring a resync.
It offers the Bbest recovery time objectives (RTO) and recovery point objectives (RPO); optimal RTO with hot backup servers for immediate switch; extreme RTO in seconds with MIMIX Active-Active; industry leading RPO with real-time remote journal-based replication.
It’s easy to use features include: browser-based, intuitive graphical interface to FastPath installation and configuration wizards; at-a-glance status monitoring and lights out monitoring with email and SNMP notification; additional easy monitoring through the Vision Solutions Portal; automates procedures with customizable, single-button switch operations; and identifies at-risk libraries, folders and directories via simple protection reports.”RELATED STORIES
Understanding IBM’s PowerHA For i
Understanding IBM i Options For High Availability
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [22 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [128 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [14 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [68 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11571905
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-GQ
Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/hp0-782
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12092099
weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000CVCH
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2017/11/pass4sure-hp0-782-real-question-bank.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/ReviewHp0-782RealQuestionAndAnswersBeforeYouTakeTest
Youtube : https://youtu.be/rzw9xmwnhLo
Google+ : https://plus.google.com/112153555852933435691/posts/Eooyp2yaok9?hl=en
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/books/004923526c29f50bf209f
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/never-miss-these-hp0-782-questions-before-you-go-for-test
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/riajpy4c1ab3mp4azh7qm62bpannllda
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/3u6upd9af402239354b52bc56545b74d975c7