|Exam Name||:||Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2|
|Questions and Answers||:||76 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||February 21, 2019|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||Pass4sure C4040-122 Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure C4040-122 Full Version|
C4040-122 exam Dumps Source : Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2
Test Code : C4040-122
Test Name : Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2
Vendor Name : IBM
Q&A : 76 Real Questions
Can I find real Q&A of C4040-122 exam?
extraordinary!, I proud to study along with your C4040-122 QA and software program. Your software helped me lots in preparingmy IBM checks.
got no hassle! three days coaching contemporary C4040-122 today's dumps is required.
i am C4040-122 certified now, way to this killexams.com internet website online. They have a extremely good series of braindumps and exam practise assets, I substantially applied them for my C4040-122 certification remaining year, and this time their sftuff is virtually as authentic. The questions are real, and the trying out engine works amazing. No issues detected. I just ordered it, practiced for every week or so, then went in and handed the C4040-122 exam. This is what an appropriate exam preparation must be like for everyone, I endorse killexams.
I need actual test questions of C4040-122 exam.
I am C4040-122 licensed now, way to this killexams.com website. They have a awesome collection of braindumps and exam practise sources, I extensively utilized them for my C4040-122 certification remaining year, and this time their sftuff is simply as accurate. The questions are real, and the exam simulator works exceptional. No issues detected. I just ordered it, practiced for per week or so, then went in and passed the C4040-122 exam. This is what the perfect exam preparation must be like for all of us, I advise killexams.
best to pay attention that actual test questions of C4040-122 examination are available.
i bought this because of the C4040-122 questions, I concept I should do the QAs element simply primarily based on my previous experience. Yet, the C4040-122 questions provided through killexams.com had been simply as beneficial. So you really need focused prep material, I passed without difficulty, all manner to killexams.com.
it's miles unbelieveable, however C4040-122 actual test questions are availabe right here.
the fast solutions made my instruction more convenient. I completed seventy five questions out off eighty well beneaththe stipulated time and managed 80%. My aspiration to be a certified take the exam C4040-122. I got the killexams.com Q&A manual simply 2 weeks earlier than the exam. thanks.
wherein can i locate C4040-122 real take a look at questions questions?
I practically misplaced trust in me within the wake of falling flat the C4040-122 exam.I scored 87% and cleared this exam. tons obliged killexams.com for getting better my truth. topics in C4040-122 have been genuinely tough for me to get it. I practically surrendered the plan to take this exam all over again. besides because of my accomplice who prescribed me to use killexams.com Questions & answers. inner a compass of simple four weeks i was absolutely prepared for this exam.
strive out those actual C4040-122 questions.
For entire C4040-122 career certifications, there may be masses of statistics available online. but, i used to be hesitant to applyC4040-122 free braindumps as individuals who placed these things on-line do no longer sense any obligation and put updeceptive info. So, I paid for the killexams.com C4040-122 q and a and couldnt be happier. its far actual that they come up withreal exam questions and solutions, that is how it changed into for me. I passed the C4040-122 exam and didnt even strain about it an awful lot. Very cool and dependable.
Real Q & A of C4040-122 exam are Awesome!
I had taken the C4040-122 preparation from the killexams.com as that was a nice platform for the preparation and that had ultimately given me the best level of the preparation to get the best scores in the C4040-122 test exams. I really enjoyed the way I got the things done in the interesting way and through the help of the same; I had finally got the thing on the line. It had made my preparation much easier and with the help of the killexams.com I had been able to grow well in the life.
simply try these dumps and success is yours.
The association time for C4040-122 exam end up certainly a nice experience for me. Effectively passing, i have located outthe way to easy all of the similarly stages. Due to killexams.com Questions & answers for all of the help. I had limited time for preparation but killexams.com brain dumps have become out to be a assist for me. It had vast questions and answers that made me plan in a short compass.
simply attempt those actual test questions and fulfillment is yours.
I passed the C4040-122 exam thanks to killexams.com, too. good to understand Im not alone! that is a fantastic way to prepare for IT test. i was concerned identification fail, so I ordered this package. The exam simulator runs very smoothly, so I ought to exercise inside the exam surroundings for hours, using real exam questions and checking my solutions. As a result, I knew pretty tons the whole lot at the exam, which become the quality Christmas and New yr present I may want to supply myself!
massive Blue's refresh contains the gargantuan vigour 795, which it pits in opposition t proper-shelf systems from HP and Oracle.
IBM Corp. final week refreshed its gadget p server line with several new POWER7-primarily based programs. The most recent POWER7 entries won't ship except September 17.
they may probably be worth the wait. huge Blue's revamped system p line comprises the gargantuan 256-method vigor 795, which IBM pits at once in opposition t properly-shelf choices from Hewlett-Packard Co. (HP) and Oracle Corp.
big Blue is never simply considering big, however: it additionally unveiled 4 gadget p "categorical" entries -- i.e., smaller, much less-costly systems slated for the mid-market. IBM's POWER7 push additionally comprises a dedicated system -- viz., the wise Analytics device 7700 -- designed for company intelligence (BI) and records warehousing workloads. or not it's of a chunk with the smart Analytics initiative that massive Blue kicked off ultimate summer season, simply prior to its acquisition of analytics powerhouse SPSS Inc.
IBM's 256-core vigour 795 plays to system p's (and RISC/Unix's) average strengths, and its smaller categorical entries -- the vigor 710, 720, 730, and 740 systems -- include massive Blue's newest effort to grapple with commodity x86 (or x64, as is universally the case) servers working chips from superior Micro devices (AMD) Inc. and Intel Corp. up to now, huge Blue had provided handiest a single power-based categorical gadget, the power 720.
during this case, huge Blue is making a bet that a a good deal lessen charge (enabled in part by using POWER7 chips that might otherwise were discarded) in addition to an capability to run AIX, device i and Linux workloads will aid tip the scales in gadget p's favor. moreover, with POWER7, IBM is once once again fielding a 2U form-ingredient server -- really, two 2U form-element servers, the vigor 710 and the energy 730. Add all of it up and you have what feels like a good effort to tackle the commodity server section -- a historically tough section to crack.
In an trade it's relocating to commoditization (and relentlessly, at that), IBM Corp. is sticking to its proprietary guns.
To make sure, large Blue is a creditable commodity participant -- its device x hardware line is powered by using chips from each AMD and Intel; its equipment x BladeCenter portfolio (which comprises a power-based offering) is not any. 2, universal, behind HP -- however likewise remains dedicated to homegrown silicon efforts similar to POWER7, which powers (in one form or a different) its device i, equipment p, and system z hardware traces.
In a way, massive Blue's POWER7 CMOS now stands as the last of the Credible x86 alternate options.
HP and Intel continue to invest in IA64 (which is in response to an EPIC structure); Oracle has said lots of the right issues about SPARC (which has having said that been hemorrhaging relevance for half a decade or greater); and different gamers (equivalent to Fujitsu and Unisys Corp.) push their personal proprietary CMOS flavors, however none can factor to the type of profits performance (relative to sales of competitive, non-commodity systems) that IBM can.
It seems that greater and faster transistors product of graphene aren't all that IBM is working on, considering that its recent press free up speaks of a new set of POWER7 servers for worrying emerging functions.
notwithstanding not definitely concentrated on the customer market, IBM is one in every of greatest names on the business, business and industrial sectors as far as computing goes.
It has a huge portfolio of machine for each current and rising functions, with monetary services, scientific analysis and healthcare management being just a few of its outlets.
What the company did most recently become carry a new batch of enhanced POWER7 blades and servers, which are additionally good for consolidation and virtualization.
"Our strategy looks to be paying off as further and further valued clientele opt for power techniques," said Tom Rosamilia, well-known supervisor of IBM power and z methods.
One product is the 16-core, single-wide IBM BladeCenter PS703, which will also be a substitute for sprawling racks and is decent for people worried with power effectivity.
The BladeCenter PS704 is corresponding to its sibling above, handiest it has double the volume of cores and, for this reason, 60-% quicker performance within the same house requirements as old-technology POWER7 products.
The announcement also mentions the upgraded IBM power 750 express and the stronger energy 755, both with 32 POWER7 cores now.
"we are working billions of severe calculations in line with Einstein's idea of relativity on the POWER7 blades," talked about Gaurav Khanna, professor of physics at UMass-Dartmouth.
"running POWER7, i'm in a position to get consequences as lots as eight times faster than working the equal calculations on an Intel Xeon processor. Calculations that used to take a month to run at the moment are finished in less than a week. This capability that i can do eight times extra science within the equal timeframe than I may do earlier than."
This web page should have assistance on anything involving IBMs smarter computing initiative.
Feb 22, 2010
IBM announced new POWER7 methods, designed to manage probably the most stressful emerging functions, ranging from smart electrical grids to true-time analytics for fiscal markets. the brand new methods contain applied sciences for the really good calls for of latest applications and features that rely on processing gigantic numbers of concurrent transactions and statistics while analyzing that information in real time. furthermore, the new systems enable consumers to manage latest functions and services at less charge with expertise breakthroughs in virtualization, power reductions, greater most economical use of reminiscence, and stronger price efficiency.
The techniques had been launched with the Linux, AIX, and IBM i operating equipment guide. the new programs and management utility include the IBM vigor 780, a brand new class of scalable, high-conclusion servers, that includes an superior modular design with as much as 64 POWER7 "cores," or CPUs, and the new TurboCore workload optimizing mode. TurboCore can convey up to 2 instances the performance per core of POWER6 processor-primarily based programs, presenting mighty ROI for purposes with excessive per-core efficiency requirements, comparable to managing and analyzing transactions from a sensible electrical grid.
The IBM energy 770 is a modular commercial enterprise device with as much as sixty four POWER7 cores, featuring higher efficiency per core than POWER6 processors and the use of up to 70% much less power for the same variety of cores because the IBM power 570. IBM energy 755, a excessive-performance computing cluster node with 32 POWER7 cores, is power celebrity-certified for energy efficiency, and optimized for the most challenging analytic workloads. additionally, the IBM vigour 750 express, an energy big name-certified business server for mid-market purchasers, offers 4 times the processing potential of its predecessor, the IBM vigor 550 express, in the identical energy envelope and 10 times the efficiency of a similar HP Integrity rx6600.
IBM systems Director specific, normal and enterprise editions offer new packaging of administration utility for the brand new techniques and encompass the superior virtualization administration capabilities of VMControl, which helps a "programs pool" of diverse vigor servers to be managed as one entity.
The vigour 750 specific and 755 are transport, and the energy 770 and 780 planned quantity availability is March 16. The IBM techniques Director editions, supporting each POWER7 and POWER6 fashions, will ship on March 5, IBM says. For greater tips about power systems, go here.
While it is hard errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals get sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater part of other's sham report objection customers come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. We never bargain on our review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is imperative to us. Extraordinarily we deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report grievance, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you see any false report posted by our rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protestation or something like this, simply remember there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of good administrations because of their advantages. There are a great many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams rehearse questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our example questions and test brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
000-602 bootcamp | ED0-001 Practice test | 000-R09 mock exam | C2040-440 cram | 000-M60 free pdf | HP0-S25 dumps questions | HP0-719 study guide | 000-585 dumps | ST0-130 Practice Test | E22-214 exam prep | C2070-981 practice questions | 850-001 real questions | C2020-605 brain dumps | 000-911 free pdf | 000-631 free pdf | HP0-S45 study guide | 840-425 questions and answers | 1Z0-034 questions and answers | C2090-614 questions answers | EW0-200 test prep |
Simply contemplate these IBM C4040-122 Questions and Pass the real test
killexams.com provide latest and up to date Pass4sure Practice Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for brand new syllabus of IBM C4040-122 Exam. Practice our Real Questions and Answers to Improve your knowledge and pass your exam with High Marks. We guarantee your pass within the Test Center, covering every one of the topics of exam and improve your Knowledge of the C4040-122 exam. Pass without any doubt with our actual questions.
You should get the recently updated IBM C4040-122 Braindumps with the actual answers, which are prepared via killexams.com experts, allowing the candidates to comprehend expertise about their C4040-122 exam path in the maximum, you will not find C4040-122 merchandise of such nice anywhere in the marketplace. Our IBM C4040-122 Practice Dumps are given to applicants at acting a hundred% of their exam. Our IBM C4040-122 exam dumps are cutting-edge in the marketplace, giving you a chance to put together in your C4040-122 exam inside the proper manner.
If you are interested in effectively Passing the IBM C4040-122 exam to start earning? killexams.com has leading side developed Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2 exam questions so one can make sure you pass this C4040-122 exam! killexams.com offers you the maximum correct, recent and updated C4040-122 exam questions and available with a 100% money back assure guarantee. There are many organizations that provide C4040-122 brain dumps but those arent correct and modern ones. Preparation with killexams.com C4040-122 new questions is a first-class manner to pass this certificationexam in high marks.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as underneath;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all tests on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
We are all well aware that a main hassle in the IT industry is that there is a loss of excellent braindumps. Our exam preparation material provides you everything you will want to take a certification exam. Our IBM C4040-122 Exam will provide you with exam questions with established answers that reflect the real exam. These questions and answers offer you with the enjoy of taking the real test. High best and price for the C4040-122 Exam. 100% assure to pass your IBM C4040-122 exam and get your IBM certification. We at killexams.com are devoted that will help you pass your C4040-122 exam with high rankings. The probabilities of you failing your C4040-122 exam, after going through our comprehensive exam dumps are very little.
killexams.com have our specialists Team to guarantee our IBM C4040-122 exam questions are dependably the most recent. They are on the whole extremely acquainted with the exams and testing focus.
How killexams.com keep IBM C4040-122 exams updated?: we have our uncommon approaches to know the most recent exams data on IBM C4040-122. Now and then we contact our accomplices who are exceptionally comfortable with the testing focus or once in a while our clients will email us the latest input, or we got the most recent update from our dumps providers. When we discover the IBM C4040-122 exams changed then we updates them ASAP.
On the off chance that you truly come up short this C4040-122 Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2 and would prefer not to sit tight for the updates then we can give you full refund. however, you ought to send your score answer to us with the goal that we can have a check. We will give you full refund quickly amid our working time after we get the IBM C4040-122 score report from you.
IBM C4040-122 Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2 Product Demo?: we have both PDF version and Testing Software. You can check our product page to perceive what it would appear that like.
At the point when will I get my C4040-122 material after I pay?: Generally, After successful payment, your username/password are sent at your email address within 5 min. It may take little longer if your bank delay in payment authorization.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
Killexams 000-347 Practice test | Killexams HP2-H24 test prep | Killexams HP0-760 real questions | Killexams 70-473 free pdf download | Killexams HP2-H36 questions answers | Killexams 1Z0-545 braindumps | Killexams EE0-411 real questions | Killexams HP0-P19 exam prep | Killexams 99 practice questions | Killexams 500-651 questions and answers | Killexams MB2-719 dump | Killexams 9A0-046 dumps | Killexams VCPD510 study guide | Killexams QQ0-401 Practice Test | Killexams 1Z0-858 dumps questions | Killexams M9560-670 cram | Killexams C9550-400 practice questions | Killexams C2170-011 exam prep | Killexams HP0-J17 questions and answers | Killexams 000-783 sample test |
Killexams F50-532 questions and answers | Killexams M9560-231 questions and answers | Killexams 650-125 practice test | Killexams 1Z0-045 test prep | Killexams VTNE dump | Killexams C2090-461 cram | Killexams 000-218 Practice test | Killexams LOT-822 dumps questions | Killexams 000-R18 test questions | Killexams 3M0-250 braindumps | Killexams NREMT-PTE real questions | Killexams BCP-520 practice test | Killexams 000-M06 mock exam | Killexams 000-052 test prep | Killexams NailTech free pdf | Killexams HP0-634 cheat sheets | Killexams 000-596 VCE | Killexams Praxis-Core examcollection | Killexams MOS-EXP practice questions | Killexams 920-158 pdf download |
ARMONK, N.Y., April 13 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) today added new servers, services and software to its lineup of 2010 systems designed to put a lid on the rising costs and complexities of operating modern data centers. The new offerings help clients reap the benefits of IBM's three-year, $3 billion investment in POWER7(TM) systems that are ready for new workloads, such as the growing use of powerful, real-time business analytics.
(Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20090416/IBMLOGO )
They include blade servers built on IBM's POWER7 workload-optimized systems' design, new systems software that can reduce the deployment of workloads from weeks to minutes, and new services to remotely implement the systems, reducing costs by up to 25%.
IBM also announced its POWER7 technology achieved record performance for a range of workloads.
New POWER7 Blades, Systems Software, Services: Improved Performance, Reduced Data Center Costs
With four, eight or 16 cores per blade, the new POWER7 servers offer clients the same 64-bit POWER® technology at work in some of the world's most critical data centers in government, research, finance and high-tech industries, among others.
Built on the proven foundation of the IBM BladeCenter® family of products and designed for mid-size businesses needing enhanced performance to manage growth and reduce complexity, the all new PS700, PS701 and PS702 Express are the premier blades for workloads ranging from web-tier and SAP application servers to distributed databases in blade-based data centers. POWER7's innovative technologies automatically optimize the blades' performance and energy efficiency, allowing the new BladeCenter PS702 Express to deliver 225% better performance per blade than the Oracle Sun Blade T6340, and 188% greater performance per blade than the HP Integrity BL860c Blade. (1)
For more information go to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/
New IBM Systems Director Software helps adjust computing resources in virtualized data center environments to focus on priority workloads. With IBM Systems Director 6.2 and IBM Systems Director VMControl, multiple virtualized and physical systems can be managed from a single interface, new workloads can be deployed in minutes instead of weeks, and server administration costs can be reduced up to 34%. IBM Active Energy Manager 4.3 monitors and manages energy use and can reduce systems energy costs by nearly 30% on Power servers. (2)
For more information on new IBM Systems Director, VMControl and Active Energy Manager offerings go to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/software/index.html
IBM Global Technology Services' new, remotely delivered implementation and migration services provide a lower-cost method (shaves up to 25% from installation costs) to install and implement IBM systems. Remote delivery allows IBM to staff engagements more quickly and gives clients a faster return on their investment. Initially available in the U.S. and Canada with plans to expand to the rest of the world later in the year, these remotely delivered, lower priced services help clients optimize system performance and reduce time to value.
For more information, go to: www.ibm.com/services/implementation
IBM also announced today a new exchange program to allow clients to upgrade to POWER7 technology immediately. IBM's lending and leasing unit, IBM Global Financing, is offering well-qualified clients to move up to POWER7 systems at monthly costs close to, or lower than what they are paying for a current POWER6(TM) lease. The program also provides for side-by-side migration of up to 60 days with little to no downtime as the upgrade occurs.
For more information go to: http://www-03.ibm.com/financing/us/lifecycle/acquire/powerx.html
Eight-Core POWER7 System Boosts Transaction-Processing Performance to Slash Licensing Costs More Than 80%
Using a sliver of its total, 64-core processing power, IBM's Power® 780 system today became the first server to deliver more than 1.2 million transactions-per-minute on only eight cores according to Transaction Processing Performance Council results. With price/performance of less than 70 cents per transaction per minute, the Power 780's 1.2 million transactions-per-minute sets a new record in performance-per-core - 4.6 times better than an HP Superdome and 7.5 times better than a Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 cluster running Oracle RAC. (3)
For businesses that run SAP, the Power 780 handled 37,000 users on 64 cores - 16% more users than a 256-core Sun Enterprise M9000 and 130% more users than a 64-core Fujitsu system running Intel Xeon® X7560 chips. (4)
Record-Setting Performance for Web and Analytics Workloads
The Power 780 also demonstrated the ability to deliver leadership, workload-optimized performance by setting new records across the three major industry-standard processor benchmarks for Java, integer and high-performance-computing workloads, achieving between 1.8 and three-times the performance of all other competitive published eight-socket results. (5)
IBM Power Systems' built-in virtualization provides the ability to scale virtual machines to the full capacity of the system - up to eight-times more than VMware. IBM testing indicates clients deploying virtualization may see up to 65% more performance-per-virtual machine on a Power 750 Express running PowerVM(TM) than a similarly configured HP DL380 G6 running VMware. (6)
Today's benchmark results continue to demonstrate that IBM Power Systems are able to deliver more compute power with fewer cores and less energy consumption than Sun/Oracle and HP/Itanium® based servers. This performance leadership across all major workloads, combined with Power systems' built-in virtualization technology means clients can achieve dramatic cost savings and energy efficiency in their data centers. For instance, by using 87% fewer cores than a Sun SPARC Enterprise Cluster to deliver more than one million transactions per minute, the Power 780 allows clients to slash database licensing and maintenance costs by up to 80%. (7)
New Operating Environments, Developer Tools
New AIX® 6 Express Edition offers clients a new, lower-priced edition of AIX designed for SMB environments or smaller workloads consolidated on midrange or high-end Power Systems. Supporting up to four cores per image and 8GB per core, AIX 6 Express provides the reliability and flexibility of AIX at lower cost. AIX Express joins the existing AIX Standard and Enterprise Editions to fill out the new family of AIX 6 offerings.
The new IBM i 7.1 integrated operating environment is designed to take advantage of workload optimization features of POWER7, including automatic exploitation of Solid State Drives for optimum performance. Enhanced support for XML in DB2®, the integrated database for IBM i, helps companies exchange information between customers and suppliers, a new virtualization feature for PowerVM enables simpler testing of new releases before a software upgrade, and asynchronous geographic mirroring with PowerHA(TM) SystemMirror provides support for multi-site clustering over longer distances.
For more information go to: www.ibm.com/systems/power/software/i/advantages/v7r1/index.html
IBM Rational Developer for Power V7.6 gives users of Power Systems on AIX a modern, Eclipse-based development environment that supports C/C++ and COBOL development, and is also tightly integrated with Rational Team Concert for Power Systems for improved application lifecycle management. IBM is also introducing Rational compilers for C/C++ and Fortran, both optimized for POWER7. This new environment can provide up to 30% improvement in workload productivity. (8)
For more information go to http://www-01.ibm.com/software/rational/announce/power/
For more information on new products announced today and to register for a special IBM webcast visit ibm.com/systemsContact(s) information Rick Bause IBM Media Relations 845-892-5463 [email protected] Mike Corrado IBM Media Relations 914-766-4635 [email protected]
IBM is a trademark of IBM Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. All other company/product names and service marks may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. UNIX is a registered trademark in the United States and other countries licensed exclusively through The Open Group. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvald.
(1) SPEC® and the benchmark names SPECrate®, SPECint®, and SPECjbb® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. For the latest SPEC benchmark results, visit http://www.spec.org. All results are the best result posted at www.spec.org as of April 5, 2010 for the system indicated except for the IBM BladeCenter result which was submitted to SPEC as of April 13, 2010.
SPECint_rate 2006 results: IBM BladeCenter PS702 with 16 cores, two processor chips, and four threads per core had a peak result of 520. HP Integrity BL860c i2 with 8 cores, 2 processor chips and two threads per core had a peak result of 134. Sun Blade T6340 with 16 cores, two processor chips and eight threads per core had a peak result of 160.
SPECjbb2005 results: : IBM BladeCenter PS702 with 16 cores, two processor chips, and four threads per core running with 16 JVM instances had a result of 1,119,946 bops and 69,997 bops per JVM. Sun Blade T6340 with 16 cores, two processor chips and eight threads per core running with 16 JVM instances had a result of 388,456 bops and 24,279 bops per JVM.
(2) Source: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/common/ssi/sa/wh/n/xbw03007usen/XBW03007USEN.PDF
page 3 of VALUE PROPOSITION FOR IBM SYSTEMS DIRECTOR
Challenges of Operational Management for Enterprise Server Installations
International Technology Group
(3) Transaction performance based on tpmC results as on 4/9/2010. Source: Transaction Processing Performance Council, www.tpc.org as of 4/9/10. IBM result submitted on 4/13/10. IBM Power 780 with 2 processor chips, 8 cores, 16 threads achieved 1,200,011 tpmC @ $.69 $/tpmC. Database was DB2 9.1 on AIX 6.1. System availability is 10/13/2010. tpmC per core is 150,001. HP Integrity Superdome with 64 processor chips, 128 cores, 256 threads achieved 4,092,799 tpmC @ $2.93 $/tpmC. Database was Oracle 10g on HP-UX 11i v3. System availability was 8/6/2007. tpmC per core is 31,975. Sun/Oracle T5440 cluster with 48 processor chips, 384 cores, 3,072 threads achieved 7,646,486 tpmC @ $2.36 $/tpmC. Database was Oracle 11g EE RAC on Solaris 10. System availability was 3/19/2010. tpmC per core is 19,913. IBM x3850 M2 with 4 processor chips, 16 cores, 16 threads achieved 516,752 tpmC @ $2.59 $/tpmC. Database was DB2 9.5 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. System availability was 3/14/2008. tpmC per core is 32,297.
(4) The IBM Power 780 achieved the highest result ever published on the two-tier SAP® Sales and Distribution (SD) standard application benchmark running SAP enhancement package 4 for the SAP ERP application Release 6.0 (Unicode) with a result of 37,000 SAP SD benchmark users. The 64-core Power 780 handled 16 percent more users than a 256-core Sun Enterprise M9000 (Oracle's biggest system) and 130 percent more users than a 64-core Fujitsu 1800E system running Intel's Xeon X7560 chip. IBM Power System 780, 8p / 64-c / 256-t, POWER7, 3.8 GHz, 1024 GB memory, 37,000 SD users, dialog resp.: 0.98s, line items/hour: 4,043,670, Dialog steps/hour: 12,131,000, SAPS: 202,180, DB time (dialog/ update):0.013s / 0.031s, CPU utilization: 99%, OS: AIX 6.1, DB2 9.7, cert# 2010013; SUN M9000, 64p / 256-c / 512-t, 1156 GB memory, 32,000 SD users, SPARC64 VII, 2.88 GHz, Solaris 10, Oracle 10g , cert# 2009046; Fujitsu 1800E, 8p / 64-c / 128-t, 512 GB memory, 16,000 SD users, Intel Xeon X7560, 2.26 GHz, Windows Server 2008 R2 DE, SQL Server 2008, cert#: 2010010. All results are 2-tier, SAP EHP 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode) and valid as of 4/1/2010.
All SAP Sales and Distribution 2-tier benchmark results can be found at http://www.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx
(5) Best in class 8-socket results: IBM Power 780 64-core (3.86 GHz, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip,4 threads/core) SPECint_rate2006 result of 2,526; IBM Power 780 64-core (3.86 GHz, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip,4 threads/core) SPECfp2006 result of 2,240; IBM Power 780 64-core (8 chips, 128 threads) 3.86 GHz IBM Power 780 System running AIX V6.1 with a SPECjbb2005 result of 5,210,501 bops (81,414 bops/JVM).
Competitive 8-socket results: SPECint_rate2006: Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST 1800E 64-core (Intel Xeon X7560, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip, 2 threads/core) SPECint_rate2006 result of 1339; SPECfp_rate 2006: SGI Altix ICE 8200EX 32-core (Intel Xeon X5570, 2.93 GHz, 8 chips, 4 cores/chip, 2 threads/core) SPECfp_rate2006 result of 742; SPECjbb2005: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP DL785 G6 achieved 1,984,616 bops (248,077 bops/JVM on a 480core system (8 chips, 48 threads).
SPEC and the benchmark names SPECrate, SPECint, and SPECjbb are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Benchmark results stated reflect results published on www.spec.org (link resides outside ibm.com) as of April 8, 2010.
(6) "A Comparison of PowerVM and VMware Virtualization Performance", April 2010. White Paper available through www.ibm.com.
(7) Claim based on comparing an 8-core Power 780 system vs. a cluster of two Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 both of which are estimated to deliver over 1 million OLTP transactions per minute. For details on the comparison please go to:
(8) According to IBM Business Partner Oxford International, a leading provider of enterprise modernization solutions, new IBM Rational application development and management software for POWER7 is providing improvements of up to 30 percent in team productivity in all aspects of the development process.
Data Centers | NewsNew IBM Mainframe Can Manage 100,000 Virtual Machines Simultaneously
Big Blue's zEnterprise, a "data center in a box," pools RISC and x86-based blades.
IBM has launched what it described its most significant advance in data center infrastructure over the last two decades. The new zEnterprise is a mainframe noteworthy not just because of its increased processing capacity but because it is the first to provide integration with its Power7 blade infrastructure and x86-based blade racks.
Big Blue launched the new zEnterprise Thursday in New York. IBM said the new mainframe is 60 percent faster and equally more efficient from a power utilization perspective than the model it replaces, the z10.
The mainframe has a 5.2 GHz processor with up to 96 cores, houses 3 TB of RAM, and can process 50 billion instructions per second (BIPS). In addition to the boost in capacity, it allows the x86 and Power7 processor-based systems to run as a common virtualized platform, sharing network, storage, and power components.
"This is the most powerful announcement we have ever made in the history of the IBM company in terms of customer economics," said Steve Mills, senior vice president of IBM's software and hardware divisions. "We have never in our history done anything that has put more money back in the hands of the customer than this announcement. We have solved a massive business problem that almost any business of reasonable size has today, and that's bringing down that cost of IT operation."
Mills, who called this new system a "data center in a box," extolled its new integrated platform for its shared infrastructure across various processors. The system can manage 100,000 virtual machines simultaneously, a threshold Mills said will be hard to duplicate. "During this decade, nobody will deliver deeper, more profound, fully mobile, fully portable virtualization the way this system provides full virtualization for workloads," Mills said.
At the core of this new virtualized capability is the combination of IBM's new zEnterprise Blade Center Extension (xBX) and the zEnterprise Unified Resource Manager, which allow for the sharing of workloads between the core mainframe and IBM's Power7 and x86 processor blades.
The Universal Resource Manager is made up of software and embedded hardware, said IBM Distinguished Engineer Donna Dillenberger, in an interview at launch event. "It's on both sides. It's on the mainframe side and the blade side, so you can get a coherent view of what's running, and you can get a coherent management actions between both, and it comes with zEnterprise," Dillenberger said.
In the past IBM had individual technologies that managed various clusters, but the Universal Resource Manager provides a much tighter association, added David Gelardi, IBM's vice president of sales, support, and education. "It's a very broad pipe between the blade environment and the mainframe environment," Gelardi said in an interview. "That is very important from an application perspective, that's where the integration comes from."
While IBM talked up its ability to run Linux-based x86 blades, it talked down its ability to run Windows workloads. It's "about lack of visibility into source code, not wanting to support an OS that 'drag[s] in primitives from DOS,' and generally not being able to shape Windows to the management IBM would want," noted Redmonk analyst Michael Cote in a blog posting.
But Gelardi said organizations still could opt to run Windows workloads. "There's no reason you can't use it to run Windows because Tivoli's provisioning capabilities is operating systems agnostic," he said. "Windows would run on an outboard blade and ultimately would run on an xBlade inside zBX."
Jeffrey Schwartz is editor of Redmond magazine and also covers cloud computing for Virtualization Review's Cloud Report. In addition, he writes the Channeling the Cloud column for Redmond Channel Partner. Follow him on Twitter @JeffreySchwartz.
Why is it that every time humans develop a really clever computer system in the movies, it seems intent on killing every last one of us at its first opportunity?
In Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece, 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL 9000 starts off as an attentive, if somewhat creepy, custodian of the astronauts aboard the USS Discovery One, before famously turning homicidal and trying to kill them all. In The Matrix, humanity’s invention of AI promptly results in human-machine warfare, leading to humans enslaved as a biological source of energy by the machines. In Daniel H. Wilson’s book Robopocalypse, computer scientists finally crack the code on the AI problem, only to have their creation develop a sudden and deep dislike for its creators.
And you’re not an especially sentient being yourself if you haven’t heard the story of Skynet (see The Terminator, T2, T3, etc.)
The simple answer is that — movies like Wall-E, Short Circuit, and Chappie, notwithstanding — Hollywood knows that nothing guarantees box office gold quite like an existential threat to all of humanity. Whether that threat is likely in real life or not is decidedly beside the point. How else can one explain the endless march of zombie flicks, not to mention those pesky, shark-infested tornadoes?
The reality of AI is nothing like the movies. Siri, Alexa, Watson, Cortana — these are our HAL 9000s, and none seems even vaguely murderous. The technology has taken leaps and bounds in the last decade, and seems poised to finally match the vision our artists have depicted in film for decades. What then?
Is Siri just a few upgrades away from killing you in your sleep, or is Hollywood running away with a tired idea? Looking back at the last decade of AI research helps to paint a clearer picture of a sometimes frightening, sometimes enlightened future.
An increasing number of prominent voices are being raised about the real dangers of humanity’s continuing work on so-called artificial intelligence.
Chief among them is Dr. Nick Bostrom, a philosopher who also holds degrees in physics and computational neuroscience. In his 2014 book, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, he outlines in rigorous detail the various ways a “strong” AI — should we succeed in building one — would wipe us off the face of the planet the moment it escapes our control. Forget about wholesale nuclear annihilation — that’s how power-hungry human dictators go about dealing with an unwanted group of humans. No, a strong AI would instead starve us to death, use up all of our natural resources, or, if it’s feeling really desperate, dismantle our bodies at a molecular level and use the resulting biomass for its own purposes.
Dr. Nick Bostrom warns about the potential dangers of a runaway AI at a 2015 TED talk in Vancouver, Canada. (Photo: Bret Hartman/TED)
But don’t take it personally. As Bostrom points out, an artificial superintelligence likely won’t behave according to any human notions of morality or ethics. “Anthropomorphic frames encourage unfounded expectations about the growth trajectory of a seed AI and about the psychology, motivations, and capabilities of a mature superintelligence,” he says.
Don’t let Bostrom’s professorial language fool you — he’s deadly serious about the consequences of an AI that can outthink even the smartest human being, and none of them are good. More frighteningly, he says that we may go from giving ourselves high-fives over creating the first AI that can think as well as we can to cowering in the corner as it hunts us down in as little as a few weeks, or perhaps even days. It all comes down to a few key factors that will likely influence our future with AI.
Computers think really fast. In the best-case scenario, we’ll have enough time between an AI acquiring the ability to think as well as us and its rise to super-intelligent status that we can adjust and respond. On the other hand, as Bostrom points out, when you’re dealing with a machine that can think — and therefore develop — at an almost unimaginable speed, by the time we realize what’s going on, it will already be far too late to stop it. Some readers may remember the 1970s sci-fi horror flick Demon Seed, in which an AI not only predicts that it will be shut down by its fearful creator, but employs murder and rape to ensure its survival.
“If and when a takeoff occurs,” Bostrom writes, “it will likely be explosive.” Stephen Hawking has echoed this sentiment: “Once humans design artificial intelligence,” he says, “it will take off on its own and develop at an ever-increasing rate. Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn’t compete and would be superseded.”
Computers often produce unexpected results. AI researchers are regularly surprised by the outcome of their experiments. In 2013, a researcher discovered that his AI — designed to learn to play NES games — decided to pause the gameplay on Tetris as its preferred solution to the goal of not losing.
At our early stage of AI development, this is a good thing; surprises often lead to new discoveries. Unexpected results paired with a massive and sudden surge in intelligence would be quite the opposite. Being able to anticipate the way a superintelligent AI will respond to, well, anything, could prove to be impossible, in much the same way our actions and motivations are utterly impenetrable to an insect.Strong AI, weak AI, and the stuff we already use
Artificial intelligence research has at times resembled the hunt for the Holy Grail. In the summer of 1956, there was a belief that we could achieve strong AI (aka, artificial general intelligence), which can be thought of as mimicking human intelligence in all of its forms, functions, and subtleties. Researchers at Dartmouth University thought that if they could endow computers with the basic building blocks of human intelligence — reasoning, knowledge representation, planning, natural language processing, and perception — then somehow, general intelligence would simply emerge.
Obviously, that didn’t happen. In fact, over the intervening decades, there were several boom and bust cycles in AI research (often dubbed “AI winters”) that moved a few of these building blocks forward, but then failed to show ongoing progress after an initial period of excitement.
What did happen were various advances in each of the building blocks, resulting in an assortment of “weak AIs,” or practical AIs.
AI doesn’t just exist in far-flung visions of the future. Google has been using it since 2015 to improve search results. (Video: Google)
The Google search engine could just be the best-known example of weak AI. Its algorithms do an exceptional job of pulling together hundreds of variables and combining those with the words you type to produce a results page culled from the vastness of the web.
In fact, most of the examples of AI from the past 10 years probably haven’t struck you as examples of AI at all, which just goes to show how successful they’ve been. Most have quietly and seamlessly integrated themselves into our lives, making them better in small but significant ways.
Google’s Photos product shows how far we’ve come in perception AI — type in “bicycle” and it will find photos you’ve taken of two-wheeled vehicles, even if you never labeled them as such.
The predictive text options that appear as we type on our phones save us valuable taps, while autocorrect attempts to make up for the fact that on-screen keyboards and human thumbs are a recipe for inaccuracy (notwithstanding the hilarity that often ensues when it tries to come to our rescue).
Amazon’s “suggested for you” product recommendations feature is an example of AI used to make money. It was reportedly responsible for 35 percent of the company’s sales in 2006, and the people behind the technology have since made it available to other retailers, resulting in “billions” of sales.
So-called intelligent assistants from Apple, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft (Siri, Google Now, Alexa, and Cortana, respectively) all leverage recent advances in natural language processing (NLP), combined with sophisticated heuristics, which make questions like “what’s the weather going to be like today?” the hands-free equivalent of jumping into a weather app or Googling the same phrase. Google’s CEO, Sundar Pichai, recently boasted that his company’s NLP AI is approaching human levels of understanding, which may explain why he told shareholders that “the next big step will be for the very concept of the ‘device’ to fade away.”
The Waze GPS and crowdsourced mapping app is a great example of AI planning.
Recently, chatbots have become the most “talked about” form of AI. In 2014, the University of Reading in England declared that the Turing Test had finally been passed, 65 years after its inception, by an algorithm masquerading as a 13-year-old Ukrainian boy named Eugene. Eugene is a chatbot — a pretty good one by all accounts — but despite passing the test, it is still not an example of true strong AI. Cleverbot — another AI chatbot – which is claimed to have passed the Turing Test in 2011, is available to have a chat with anyone. But labeling it “intelligent,” might depend on your definition of the word.
Me: Do you believe in God?Clev: Do you?Me: That’s not an answer.Clev: You did not ask a question.Me: Yes I did. I asked: Do you believe in God?Clev: Yes, I do. Why don’t you?Me: Why do you think I don’t believe in God?Clev: Because you said that you did not.Me: No, I didn’t. You aren’t a very good listener, are you?Clev: Fine fine. I know you said that. But whatever. Do you like Lady Gaga?
Both the Turing Test itself and the claims that it has been passed, are not without criticism.
Microsoft learned just how fallible a chatbot AI can be in a spectacularly public fashion when it released Tay, an AI Twitter bot, on an unsuspecting global audience earlier this year. Less than 24 hours after Tay began interacting with people, she — er — it, became sexist and racist, offering praise for Hitler among other gaffes.
From left to right, Jeopardy host Alex Trebek poses with legendary contestants Ken Jennings, IBM’s Watson supercomputer, and Brad Rutter. Watson would later wipe the floor with both human contestants in a showdown. (Photo: Jeopardy Productions)Where’s Watson?
If the AI industry has a celebrity, it’s IBM’s Watson. After handily defeating all-time Jeopardy! champ Ken Jennings in 2011, the supercomputing application dropped the mic and started a new life in the somewhat less exciting sphere of commercial applications. But Watson’s victory caused a lot of people to start wondering if IBM’s wunderkind was in fact an embryonic HAL 9000. Guru Banavar, IBM’s Vice President of Cognitive Computing, places it in a different category entirely.
“We think of AI as augmented intelligence, as opposed to artificial intelligence,” Banavar told Digital Trends. He believes that the notion of AI as a carbon copy of the human brain is a distraction, one that entirely misses the point of how this technology can best be put to use. “Augmented intelligence is a partnering between a person and a machine,” he explains, with the goal being to offload the work that a person isn’t able to do as well as the machine. It forms a symbiotic relationship of sorts, in which the two entities work better together than each of them would do on their own.
IBM refers to this approach to AI as “cognitive computing,” specifically because it does not seek to replicate the entirety of human intelligence. The approach IBM took to solving the Jeopardy! problem wasn’t centered on making a synthetic brain, but rather on getting a machine to process a very specific type of information — language — in order to hunt for and ultimately produce the right answer for the game’s reverse-question format. To do this, Banavar recounts, took a combination of advances “going back almost 10 years.” Simply getting Watson to understand the massive number of permutations of meaning within English, was daunting. Its eventual success was “a big breakthrough for the whole field of computer science,” Banavar claims.
IBM continues to develop Watson, as well as its other investments in AI, in pursuit of what Banavar calls “grand challenges.” These are computing problems so difficult and complex, they often require dozens of researchers and a sustained investment over months or years. Or, as Banavar puts it: “Not something you can do with a couple of guys in a garage.”
A cluster of 90 IBM Power 750 servers power Watson, and each one uses a 3.5 GHz POWER7 eight-core processor. (Video: IBM)
One such challenge is reading medical images. The growing number of X-rays, CT scans, PET scans, and MRIs being done every day is a potential lifesaving boon for patients, but it’s also a growing problem for the profession of radiology. At the moment, a radiologist must personally assess each scan to look for signs of disease or other anomalies. The sheer number of scans being done are creating increasing demand for trained radiologists, whose numbers are limited simply due to the rigorous and lengthy training required to become one. Banavar describes the work they do as “very monotonous and error prone,” not because these doctors lack the skill, but because they are only human. It’s a scenario that seems almost custom-built for the kind of AI that IBM has been working on. In order to significantly impact the number and quality of scans that can be processed, researchers are using Watson to understand the content of the images, within the full medical context of the patient. “Within the next two years,” Banavar says, “we will see some very significant breakthroughs in this.”Teaching a machine to learn
For IBM to succeed, it will have to solve a problem that has plagued AI efforts from their very beginnings: Computers tend to follow the instructions they’re given in such a literal way that, when the unexpected occurs — a situation the developer hadn’t foreseen — they proceed anyway, often with undesirable outcomes. But what if machines possessed the ability to know when something doesn’t quite fit and adjust accordingly, without being told so explicitly? In other words, what if they possessed common sense?
Dr. Maya Gupta is a senior AI researcher at Google, and she is attempting to do just that. Using a tool within the AI arsenal known as machine learning, Gupta and her colleagues are slowly training computers to filter information in a way that most humans find relatively simple. Her current goal — improving video recommendations on YouTube — might seem modest, or even boring, but from an AI researcher’s perspective, it’s nirvana. That’s because of the fundamental difference between how machines and humans learn.
“A 3-year-old can learn an enormous amount of things from very few examples,” Gupta says. The same cannot be said for computers, which require vast quantities of data to acquire the same level of understanding. It also requires some pretty significant computing resources, which is why Nvidia recently launched a new kind of supercomputer developed specifically to run deep-learning algorithms.
Curiously, computer scientists have known how to “teach” machines for several decades. The missing ingredient has been, well, the ingredients. “You can have a model that can learn from a billion examples,” Gupta explains, “but if you don’t have a billion examples, the machine has nothing to learn from.” Which is why YouTube, with its monster catalog of videos, is the perfect place to nurture a data-hungry process like machine learning. Gupta’s algorithms are being taught two kinds of common sense, known as smoothness and monotonicity. Both feel like child’s play: Smoothness dictates that you shouldn’t let one small change throw off a decision that has been based on dozens of other factors, while monotonicity operates on an “all other things being equal, this one fact should make it the best choice” principle.
In practice, smoothness means that a potentially great video recommendation isn’t dismissed by the algorithm simply because it contained both cooking and traveling information, when the previously watched video was purely about cooking. For monotonicity, Gupta cites the example of recommending a coffee shop. If you’ve identified that you like coffee shops that serve organic, fair trade coffee and that also have free Wi-Fi, then the one that is closest to you should top the recommended list, even though you never specified distance as important. “It would surprise some humans just how hard that is,” Gupta says of the effort involved in teaching machines to respect patterns that any 5-year-old could pick up on.
Project Malmo Katja HoffmanMore
Microsoft researcher Katja Hofmann, center, is teaching machines to play Minecraft as part of Project Malmo, which is intended to improve human-machine cooperation. (Photo: Scott Eklund/Red Box Pictures)Mining for knowledge in Minecraft
As successful as it might be at finding just the right video for you, that algorithm has trouble performing the same task with music recommendation. “It’s hard to transfer what we’ve learned,” Gupta acknowledges, something she says is a challenge for the industry, not just Google. So how do you teach an AI to be flexible, in addition to having common sense? Dr. Katja Hofmann, a researcher at the Machine Intelligence and Perception group at Microsoft Research Cambridge, thinks she has the answer: Teach it how to play Minecraft.
Project Malmo is Hofmann’s attempt to repurpose the massively popular online game into an experimentation platform for artificial intelligence research. Her team has developed a modification for the game that lets AI “agents” interact directly with the Minecraft environment. “Minecraft is really interesting because it’s an open-world game,” Hofmann told us, which offers a unique space in which AI agents can deal with different environments that change over time, a key point if you’re trying to foster flexible learning. This aspect of Minecraft created problems during early attempts to get agents to achieve goals. “The world doesn’t wait for the agent to make its decision,” she says, referring to the real-time nature of the game, and its obvious parallels to real life.
Using the mod not only gives an agent the ability to manipulate the LEGO-like bricks of material that are central to the game’s environment — it can also interact with other players, including humans. One of Hofmann’s long-term goals for Project Malmo is to improve human-computer cooperation. Much like at IBM, the philosophy driving these experiments, and in fact Microsoft’s entire approach to AI, is that it should work collaboratively with people. Experiments have already revealed that AI agents are able to complete tasks which humans simply found too hard. Hofmann is eagerly anticipating an agent that learns to collaborate with humans to solve tasks. “That would mean we have achieved a big breakthrough,” she said.
It could come from collaboration. Earlier this year, Microsoft decided to open source Project Malmo, a move that could yield important discoveries, especially if Microsoft’s competitors take an interest. IBM’s Watson has proven its trivia chops on Jeopardy! but how would it fare when asked to build a house out of bricks? Over at Google, the team behind DeepMind has already enjoyed success in getting an algorithm to learn how to play Space Invaders! — a game with a single goal — maximize points — and only three control options: move left, move right, and fire. Does it possess the flexibility that Hofmann is trying to encourage for success in Minecraft?Strike up the roboband
Having an entity that can apply logic, reasoning, and brute mathematical prowess to challenges in engineering, medicine, and research just makes sense. But what about art? Can AI play a role in the creation of beauty, whether it’s cinema, sculpture, or even music? Google is determined to find out.
The company recently showed off the capabilities of its DeepMind AI platform to perform mind-bending, almost hallucinogenic transformations of images and videos through a process it has dubbed DeepDream. It’s a fun, trippy thing to do to your favorite photos, but it seems to fall short of the independent creative process we normally attribute to “artists,” and might be more appropriately described as an Instagram filter on steroids.
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream c e deMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream d caMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream c e fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fc aeMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream eMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream bf c caMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream ec bMore
Google’s Deep Dream Generator reinterprets photos into psychedelic works of art using neural networks. (Photos: Deep Dream Generator)
Dr. Douglas Eck, a research scientist at Google, was intrigued when he first saw DeepDream. He recognized it immediately as a powerful example of machine learning, or “good ol’-fashioned neural networks, done right,” as he puts it. But Eck was also struck by something else: “This stuff can be fun.” So Eck decided to lobby the senior brass at Google to let him build a small team to investigate how machine learning could be further leveraged in the world of art, only this time it would be focused on music, an area Eck has long been passionate about. “Much to my pleasure,” Eck recounts, “Google was right on board with this,” and Magenta was born.
Generating music algorithmically isn’t new. You can listen to some of Eck’s own efforts from his time working on it at the University of Montreal in 2002. “The question is,” Eck asks, philosophically, “how do you build models that can generate [music] and can understand whether they’re good or not, based upon feedback from their audience, and then improve?” It starts to sound like Magenta is going to unleash a horrible new wave of computer-generated Muzak, but Eck is quick to assure us that’s not the point. “In the end,” he says, “people want to connect with people. Consuming 100-percent machine-generated content is a bit of dead end.”
Instead, he sees Magenta as an opportunity to create the world’s next electric guitar. “Can we build AI tools that help people express themselves in ways they couldn’t before?” Eck wonders. He cites Jimi Hendrix’s iconic use of amplification and distortion as an example: “That really opened up whole channels for him to express himself that weren’t there before,” he told Digital Trends.
But unlike Hendrix’s guitar, the instruments that Magenta births will ideally be smart. Really smart. “You can already drop some bass loops into GarageBand and play on top of it,” he points out. “But what if there’s actually some smarts to this bassist?” In Eck’s vision of the future, the Magenta code base will construct a virtual bandmate that listens to you as you play, and can intelligently — perhaps even creatively — follow along and respond accordingly. “It’s like your copilot,” he said.
Just like Project Malmo, Magenta is now open source, an important step if any of Eck’s dreams for a backup band of AI musicians are to be realized. Because Magenta is built on a machine-learning framework — Google’s own open-source TensorFlow software — it is incredibly data hungry. By opening access to a worldwide community of musicians, Magenta could evolve very quickly. “If we can be playing along with other musicians, the amount of information that’s present for learning is just astonishing,” Eck enthuses.From music to megalomania?
Each of the AI experts we spoke to all share an enthusiasm for the future potential of the technology that borders on the religious. They also share an equally skeptical view of Bostrom’s doomsday prophecies. For them, the notion that one day a superintelligent AI will turn on an unsuspecting human population remains very much the domain of science fiction, not science fact.
“I do not believe that machines are going to end up being autonomous entities that go off and do things on their own,” IBM’s Banavar says when asked about the likelihood of a machine intelligence that would need to be controlled. His primary concern for our future with the machines is one that programmers have been obsessing over for years: Poor performance because of bug-ridden code. “That’s a much bigger problem in my mind than machines that will wake up one day and do something they weren’t designed to do,” he said.
Google’s Gupta points to a basic stumbling block that she thinks will hamstring the development of a strong AI for years to come: “Our best philosophers and neuroscientists aren’t sure what consciousness is,” she notes, “so how can we even start talking about what it means [for a machine to be conscious] or how we would go about replicating that digitally?” It’s hard to tell if she’s being sincere or coy — many observers have suggested that if any entity working on the AI problem today will crack the code, it’s probably going to be Google. Given a sufficiently long runway, she believes anything is possible. “I think we can do it … I’d think in the next hundred years,” she offers. “I’m just not sure it’s going to be that interesting.”
Microsoft’s Hofmann echoes Gupta’s thoughts about the difficulty of achieving a machine with a truly general level of intelligence. “I believe that it may be possible in principle,” she says, “but just knowing the state of the art in AI, I don’t see us getting anywhere close to those predictions any time in the near future.”
Google’s Eck finds the topic somewhat exasperating. “This whole idea of superintelligence,” he says, “it just doesn’t make sense to me. I guess I really don’t get it.” It’s hard to reconcile this confusion with the fact that he’s on a mission to create the first intelligent, synthetic musician. But he clarifies a moment later: “My view of cognition is so tied to human perception and action. I don’t look at our brains as these computational boxes [in competition] with these other, stronger brains in boxes that happen to be inside computers.” When asked how far we might be from such a scenario, he laughs and says, “Twenty years!” because, as he points out, that’s the usual time frame experts give when they have no idea, but they need to say something.
Skeptics of Bostrom’s predictions of AI supremacy aren’t limited to those working in the field. He has also drawn criticism from the world of philosophy and ethics. Michael Chorost, author of Rebuilt: How Becoming Part Computer Made Me More Human and World Wide Mind: The Coming Integration of Humanity, Machines, and the Internet, feels he has a strong understanding of how computers and their code work, despite not having a background in AI. He classifies Bostrom’s Superintelligence as “a brilliantly wrong book.”
Chorost believes we may create increasingly powerful AI agents, but he’s unconvinced these algorithms will ever become sentient, let alone sapient. He compares these concerns to climbing a tree, and then declaring we’re closer to the moon. Much like Gupta, Banavar and Eck, he says the biggest question is how a machine, made up of circuits and code, could ever achieve that status. He subscribes to the idea that there is something inherently special about our bodies, and their “aqueous chemical” makeup, that no electronic system will ever be able to duplicate.
He falls short of ruling it out completely, however, and offers one possibly viable route it could take: An evolutionary one. Instead of trying to program awareness into machines, we should let nature do the heavy lifting. “Putting it in a complex environment that forces [an AI] to evolve,” Chorost suggests, might do the trick. “The environment should be lethally complex,” he says, evoking images of AIs competing in a virtual gladiator’s arena, “so that it kills off ineffective systems and rewards effective ones.”
The other benefit to this artificial Darwinism, if it succeeds, is that it will produce a moral AI with no genocidal tendencies. “Morality is actually built into how evolution works,” he claims, saying that all you need to do is look at humanity for the proof. “Despite both world wars, the rate of violent death has been consistently falling,” he notes. “We’re actually getting more moral with each passing decade — that is not accidental. That’s a process that comes out of reason.” Chorost himself reasons that any AI that develops over time — thanks to evolution — will thus be a kinder, gentler entity because we’ve seen this process play out in all of us.So why worry?
Perhaps Chorost is right. Perhaps the essential ingredients for sentience will never be reproduced in silicon, and we’ll be able to live comfortably knowing that as incredibly capable as Siri becomes, she’s never going to follow her own desires instead of catering to ours, like in the movie Her. But even if you don’t buy into the idea that one day AI will become an existential threat, Gary Marchant thinks we should all be paying a lot more attention to the risks that come with even a moderately more sophisticated level of artificial intelligence.
Officially, Marchant is the Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University. When he’s not lecturing students at ASU, he’s working on a legal and ethical framework for the development of AI as a member of the international engineering standards body, the IEEE. When he’s not doing that, Marchant co-investigates the “control and responsible innovation in the development of autonomous machines” thanks to grant money from the Future Of Life Institute — an organization that funds research and outreach on scenarios that could pose an existential risk to humanity (including AI). These activities give Marchant a 50,000-foot perspective on AI that few others possess. His conclusion? There are two areas that require immediate attention.
Military drones like the MQ-9 Reaper currently only operate with human pilots remotely at the controls, but AI developments may eventually enable them to kill autonomously. (Photo: General Atomics Aeronautical)
“One that concerns me the most,” he says, “is the use of AI in the military.” At the moment, the U.S. drone arsenal is remote-controlled. The pilot is still in command, even if she’s sitting hundreds of miles away, but that scenario may already have an expiration date. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, is reportedly interested in developing autonomous software agents that could identify and repair security risks in computing systems. “There will be strong incentives to go more and more autonomous,” Marchant warns, because it will be seen as the only viable way to respond to an adversary who is already benefitting from the faster-than-human decision-making these systems are capable of. “Then you’re reliant on these systems not to make mistakes,” he notes, ominously.
It might be easy to dismiss his concerns were it not for the fact that a federal advisory board to the Department of Defense just released a study on autonomy that echoes his words, almost verbatim: “Autonomous capabilities are increasingly ubiquitous and are readily available to allies and adversaries alike. The study therefore concluded that DoD must take immediate action to accelerate its exploitation of autonomy while also preparing to counter autonomy employed by adversaries.”
The other use of AI that Marchant believes is in need of examination is much closer to home: “The movement toward autonomous cars,” he says, is going to require thoughtful development and much better regulation.
Tesla Autopilot allows the Model S to drive autonomously on the highway, but a number of crashes prove it’s not yet perfect. (Video: Tesla)
“As we recently saw with Tesla,” he observes, referencing the recent crashes — and one death — connected to the company’s autopilot system, “it’s a harbinger of what’s to come — people being injured or killed by an autonomous system making decisions.”
He highlights the very real ethical decisions that will be faced by AI-controlled cars: In an accident situation, whose life should be preserved — that of the passenger, another driver, or a pedestrian? It’s a question many are wrestling with, including Oren Etzioni, a computer scientist at the University of Washington and the CEO of the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, who told Wired: “We don’t want technology to play God.”
What Marchant clearly isn’t worried about is biting the hand that feeds: Much of his Future Of Life grant comes from Tesla CEO Elon Musk.What about the jobs?
Today’s manufacturing robots follow meticulously programmed instructions, but future models like this prototype from Fanuc could learn from reinforcement, just like humans. (Photo: Fanuc)
Further into the future, Marchant sees a huge problem with AI replacing human workers, a process that he claims has already begun. “I was talking to a pathologist,” he recounts, “who said his field is drying up because machines are taking it over.” Recently, a prototype AI based on IBM’s Watson began working at a global law firm. Its machine discovery and document review capabilities, once sufficiently advanced, could affect the jobs of young associate lawyers, which Marchant thinks demonstrates that it’s not only menial jobs that are at risk. “This is going to become a bigger and bigger issue,” he said. Fanuc, the largest provider of industrial robots, has recently used reinforcement learning to teach an embodied AI how to perform a new job — in 24 hours.
Google’s Gupta offers an optimistic perspective, saying, “The more interesting story is the jobs that are being created,” though she stops short of listing any of these new jobs. Her Google colleague, Eck, puts it into a historical (and of course, musical) frame, noting that the advent of drum machines didn’t create legions of unemployed drummers (or, at the very least, it didn’t add to their existing numbers). “We still have lots of drummers, and a lot of them are doing really awesome things with drum machines,” he says.
Marchant understands these arguments, but ultimately, he rejects them. The always-on, 24/7 decision-making nature of AI puts it into a technology class by itself he says. “There will be so many things that machines will be able to do better than humans,” he notes. “There was always something for humans to move to in the past. That isn’t the case now.”
Interestingly, the biggest players in AI aren’t deaf to these and other concerns regarding AI’s future impact on society and have recently joined forces to create a new nonprofit organization called The Partnership on Artificial Intelligence to Benefit People and Society, or the shorter Partnership on AI. Its members include Microsoft, Google, IBM, Facebook, and Amazon, and its stated goal is to “address opportunities and challenges with AI technologies” through open and collaborative research. The partnership isn’t interested in consulting with policymaking bodies, but the public could end up steering it that way if they can’t be convinced of the technology’s benefits.
Surprisingly, Marchant isn’t ready to demand more laws or more regulations right away. “I’m almost worried that sometimes we move too quickly,” he says, “and start putting in place laws before we know what we’re trying to address.”Just say no to AI
Dr. Kathleen Richardson, Senior Research Fellow in the Ethics of Robotics at De Montfort University, knows exactly what she’s trying to address: The goal of an aware AI, or any AI designed to mimic living things, she believes, is a fundamentally flawed pursuit. “The only reason we think it’s possible that machines could be like people,” she says, “is because we had — and still have — slavery.” For Richardson, using machines as a stand-in for a person, or indeed any other living entity, is a byproduct of a corrupt civilization that is still trying to find rationalizations to treat people as objects.
“We share properties with all life,” she says, “but we don’t share properties with human-made artifacts.” Reversing this logic, Richardson dismissed the notion that we will ever create an aware, sentient, or sapient algorithm. “I completely, utterly, 100 percent reject it,” she says. Perhaps because of this ironclad belief, Richardson doesn’t spend much time worrying about superintelligent, killer AIs. Why think about a future that will never come to pass? Instead, she’s focused her research on AI and robotics in the here and now, as well as their near-term impact. What she sees, she does not like — in particular the trend toward robotic companions, driven by improvements in AI. Though most well-known for her anti-sex robot position, Richardson opposes robotic companionship of any kind.
Softbank Pepper RobotMore
Pepper is designed to be a humanoid companion, keeping owners company like a pet, rather than performing any specific task. (Photo: Softbank)
“They say that these robots — these objects — are going to be therapeutic,” she says, referring specifically to the bleeding-edge Japanese market, which has the support of industry heavyweights like SoftBank and Sony. Richardson doesn’t put much faith in this notion, which she thinks is nothing more than yet another rationalization linked to slavery. “If you talk to elderly people,” she says, “what they want is day trips out, and contact with other human beings. None of them said, ‘What I want most of all is a robot.’” Perhaps she’s right, and yet that didn’t stop SoftBank’s Pepper — the first companion robot capable of interpreting basic human emotions — from selling out its initial run of 1,000 units in less than a minute.
Sherry Turkle, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher, psychologist and author, agrees with Richardson’s viewpoint, but mostly because she has seen that — contrary to Richardson’s claim — there is demand for AI companions, and that worries her. In 2013, Turkle gave an interview to Live Science, saying, “The idea of some kind of artificial companionship has already become the new normal.” The price for this new normalcy is that “we have to change ourselves, and in the process, we are remaking human values and human connection.”
Sophia from Hanson Robotics, also pictured at the top of this article, achieves an almost creepy level of resemblance to a real human. (Video: Hanson Robotics)
That would be just fine with Dr. David Hanson of Hanson Robotics. “The artificial intelligence will evolve to the point where they will truly be our friends,” he told CNBC.
Marchant has already weighed in on this subject. Instead of fighting this new normal, he says we might just have to embrace it. In his controversial Slate article, he outlines a future where marriages between humans and robots will not only be legal, they will be inevitable. “If a robotic companion could provide some kind of comfort and love — apparent love at least — I’m not sure that’s wrong,” he says, citing the fact that there are many in our society who, for various reasons, are incapable of forming these kinds of relationships with other humans.
Marchant makes it clear that he still values human relationships above those that involve synthetic companions, but he’s also prepared to accept that not everyone will share these values. “I’m certainly not going to marry a robot, but if my son wanted to 20 years from now, I wouldn’t say he couldn’t do that,” he claims. “I’d try to talk him out of it, but if that’s what made him happy, I’d be more concerned about that than anything else.” Perhaps as a sign of the times, earlier this year a draft plan for the EU included wording that would give robots official standing as “electronic persons.”Stepping toward the future
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has said that in 10 years, it’s likely that AI will be better than humans at basic sensory perception. Li Deng, a principal researcher at Microsoft, agrees, and goes even further, saying, “Artificial Intelligence technologies will be used pervasively by ordinary people in their daily lives.”
Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Google parent Alphabet, and Google CEO Pichai see an enormous explosion in the number of applications, products, and companies that have machine learning at their core. They are quick to point out that this type of AI, with its insatiable appetite for data, will only fulfill its potential when paired with the cloud. Urs Hölzle, Google’s senior vice president of technical infrastructure, said, “Over the next five years, I expect to see more change in computing than in the last five decades.”
These predictions are — somewhat obviously, given their sources — highly positive, but that doesn’t mean the road ahead will resemble the Autobahn. There could be significant bumps. IBM’s Banavar points to a few challenges that could hamper progress. “One of the breakthroughs we need,” he says, “is how you combine the statistical technique [of machine learning] with the knowledge-based technique.” He refers to the fact that even though machines have proven powerful at sifting through huge volumes of data to determine patterns and predict outcomes, they still don’t understand its “meaning.”
The other big challenge is being able to ramp up the computing power we need to make the next set of AI leaps possible. “We are working on new architectures,” he reveals, “inspired by the natural structures of the brain.” The premise here is that if brain-inspired software, like neural nets, can yield powerful results in machine learning, then brain-inspired hardware might be equally (or more) powerful.
All this talk about brain-inspired technology inevitably leads us back to our first, spooky, concern: In the future, AI might be a collection of increasingly useful tools that can free us from drudgery, or it could evolve rapidly — and unbeknownst to us — into the most efficient killing machine ever invented.
One of those options certainly seems a lot more desirable, but how do we make sure that’s the version we end up with?
If we follow AI expert Chorost’s advice, there’s no reason to worry, because as long as our AIs evolve, they’ll develop morality — and morality leads to benevolence. That’s assuming it’s even possible, which he disputes. “When an engineering path [to sentient AI] becomes clear,” he says, “then we’ll have a sense of what not to do.”
Banavar, despite being fairly certain that an AI with its own goals isn’t in our future, suggests that “it is a smart thing for us to have a way to turn off the machine.” The team at Google’s DeepMind agree and have written a paper in conjunction with the Future Of Life Institute that describes how to create the equivalent of a “big red button” that would let the human operator of an AI agent suspend its functions, even if the agent became smart enough to realize such a mechanism existed. The paper, titled “Safely Interruptible Agents,” does not go so far as to position itself as the way to counter a runaway superintelligence, but it’s a step in the right direction as far as Tesla CEO Musk is concerned: He recently implied that Google is the “one” company whose AI efforts keep him awake at night.
Interestingly, during the same interview with Recode, Musk suggested that OpenAI — an organization he backs that operates a grass-roots effort to make AI technology widely available to everyone — could be the ultimate antidote to a malevolent AI agent. If everyone possessed their own personal AI, he reckons, “if somebody did try to something really terrible, then the collective will of others could overcome that bad actor.”
Perhaps we will develop a strong AI. Perhaps it won’t be friendly. Perhaps we will be pushed to extinction by Skynet, offered a tenuous, uneasy truce by the machines of The Matrix, or simply ignored and left to our own (less intelligent) devices by the superintelligent OS One from Her.
Or perhaps, to quote computer scientist and AI skeptic Peter Hassan, we will simply keep “pursuing an ever-increasing number of irrelevant activities as the original goal recedes ever further into the future — like the mirage it is.”
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12833842
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12941827
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2018/01/pass4sure-c4040-122-dumps-and-practice.html
Wordpress : https://wp.me/p7SJ6L-2Ji
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/5fjme1gara0ky8yatmh22lz6wer96tn3