|Exam Name||:||Architectural Design of SOA Solutions|
|Questions and Answers||:||59 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||April 24, 2019|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||Pass4sure 000-665 Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure 000-665 Full Version|
Exam Questions Updated On :
Get 000-665 licensed with actual test exam bank.
I thanks killexams.com braindumps for this excellent achievement. yes, its far your question and solution which helped me pass the 000-665 exam with ninety one% marks. That too with best 12 days preparation time. It changed into past my imagination even three weeks before the test until i found the product. thank you lots on your invaluable guide and wish all the exceptional to you team individuals for all of the destiny endeavors.
proper region to discover 000-665 real test questions paper.
Im over the moon to say that I handed the 000-665 exam with 90 % marks. killexams.com Questions & solutions notes made the complete problem drastically smooth and smooth for me! Maintain up the great work. Inside the wake of perusing your path notes and a bit of practice structure exam simulator, i was efficaciously equipped to skip the 000-665 exam. Without a doubt, your course notes in truth supported up my truth. Some topics like trainer verbal exchange and Presentation skills are done very rightly.
Did you tried this great source of actual test questions.
I knew that I had to cleared my 000-665 exam to keep my activity in current agency and it changed into no longer smoothactivity without some assist. It became just amazing for me to research a lot from killexams.com preparation % in form of 000-665 questions answers and exam simulator. Now I proud to announce that i am 000-665 certified. exceptional workkillexams.
what is easiest manner to put together and bypass 000-665 exam?
killexams.com materials cover every thing of 000-665 , round which the 000-665 exam is constructed. So if you are new to it, this is a need to. I needed to step up my expertise of 000-665 qa has helped me plenty. I passed the 000-665 exam thanks tokillexams.com and had been recommending it to my friends and colleagues.
afraid of failing 000-665 examination!
I gave the 000-665 exercise questions handiest as soon as earlier than I enrolled for becoming a member of the killexams.com software. I did now not have achievement even after giving my ample of time to my studies. I did not realize wherein i lacked in getting fulfillment. but after becoming a member of killexams.com i got my solution become missing become 000-665 prep books. It placed all the things within the right guidelines. making ready for 000-665 with 000-665 example questions is really convincing. 000-665 Prep Books of different lessons that i had did assist me as they had been now not sufficient capable for clearing the 000-665 questions. They had been difficult in reality they did now not cover the whole syllabus of 000-665. but killexams.com designed books are simply splendid.
Can I find dumps Q & A of 000-665 exam?
I am satisfied to inform that i have efficiently handed the 000-665 exam. On this context I should admit that your question bankdid assist (if not absolutely) to tied over the exam because the questions requested within the exam were now not fullyblanketed via your question monetary organization. But I ought to congratulate your try and make us technically sound along with your Q&As. Way to killexams.com for clearing my 000-665 exam in first class.
That turned into terrific! I got dumps modern-day 000-665 exam.
Felt very proud to complete answering all questions during my 000-665 exam. Frankly speaking, I owe this success to the questions & answers by killexams.com The material covered all the related questions to each topic and presented the answers in short and precise manner. Understanding the contents became effortless and memorizing was no issue at all. I was also lucky enough to get most of the questions from the guide. Happy to pass satisfactorily. Great killexams
i'm very glad with 000-665 exam manual.
The killexams.com Q&a dump as well as 000-665 exam Simulator goes nicely for the exam. I used both them and prevailin the 000-665 exam with none trouble. The dump helped me to analyze where i was vulnerable, in order that I advanced my spirit and spent sufficient time with the particular subject matter. in this way, it helped me to put together well for the exam. I wish you right good fortune for you all.
Pleased to hear that Latest dumps of 000-665 exam are available here.
The killexams.com Questions & solutions made me efficient enough to split this exam. I endeavored ninety/95 questions in due time and passed correctly. I by no means taken into consideration passing. a great deal obliged killexams.com for help me in passing the 000-665. With a complete time work and an reliable diploma preparation facet with the aid ofside made me substantially occupied to equip myself for the 000-665 exam. by means of one way or another I got here to consider killexams.
Great source of actual test questions, accurate answers.
Its concise answers helped me to perform pinnacle marks noting all questions beneath the stipulated time in 000-665. Being an IT grasp, my abilties with respect are so forth need to be unique. Now not withstanding, intending with a standard employment with massive obligations, it changed into not easy for me to take a stable making plans. At that point, i found out approximately the generally prepared question and answer aide of killexams.com dumps.
That rumble firms may hear in the subsequent little while is the sound of fundamental IT companies jostling for place as interest in carrier-oriented architectures (SOAs) picks up.
What’s all the hubbub, you ask? whereas none of the main providers can agree on a transparent definition of the emerging idea, most can admit that SOAs — which are tied to net capabilities and nearly wreck down a large software into reusable items that span throughout the network — are becoming critical.
The premise is that now IT resources can also be loosely coupled devoid of competencies of the underlying hardware or utility operating techniques.
This month SAP AG launched its enterprise services architecture (ESA) Adoption program, a technique for pushing adoption of SAP’s NetWeaver middleware integration platform. SAP’s ESA offers a four-step application that includes most suitable-practices workshops and tools.
Ori Inbar, vice-president of product advertising at SAP, spoke of SOAs and NetWeaver will assist organizations gain the advantages of constructing customized utility.
in response to Inbar, the ESA software helps agencies define main movements and roles and create a manner map. it's going to also support them select what elements they'll use from out-of-the-container SAP or other third-birthday celebration application and what they will ought to write themselves.
The software is designed for clients seeking to evolve their IT infrastructures devoid of completely taking down their present installations, SAP stated.
additionally, this month IBM international services took the wraps off features designed for IT managers to plan, design, implement and control SOAs. The “asset-primarily based capabilities” characteristic IBM utility code, highbrow property (IP) and superior practices.
based on IBM, the functions are according to business-specific platforms to allow the quickest possible deployment of new know-how. in line with Michael Liebow, vice-president of SOA and web capabilities at IBM global services, the biggest problem for agencies looking for to deploy an SOA is how and the place they may still birth.
Liebow referred to IBM defines an SOA as a framework that pulls materials from underlying ap- plications for use in a loosely coupled application infrastructure. He delivered that the seller’s new services are in response to business-particular systems to enable the fast deployment of a new framework.
An trade-particular method defines average design and implementation ideas and might be applied to vertical appli- cations reminiscent of economic functions.
as an instance, Design services for SOA will aid organisations create a technique and an architectural design for his or her SOA, while enterprise Enablement capabilities for SOA will establish how an SOA can meet business desires.
different IBM features consist of Implementation capabilities for SOA, for deploying targeted points of an SOA and management functions for SOA, which offers ongoing performance monitoring.
not to be outdone, both Oracle Corp. and Microsoft Corp. are at work placing their own stamp on SOA. however is all of it so a good deal hype? From an business viewpoint, the capacity to hook up disparate purposes can help remedy integration woes. In a nutshell, SOA may still permit organisations to align IT with certain business goals, which then can also be translated into functions in an SOA ambiance.
Warren Shiau, an independent application analyst based mostly in Toronto, said simplest a small number of Canadian organizations have embraced SOA inside an IT architecture. This mostly has to do with the problem in migrating over to the framework, Shiau referred to. businesses will need to determine which company purposes are most excellent desirable for SOA.
SOA, in and of itself, definitely isn’t that complex, Shiau said. “If all and sundry became ranging from a clean slate possibly it wouldn’t be so tough.” Most agencies are coping with disparate techniques and legacy purposes and they should combine these methods to exist in an internet functions-compliant world with a purpose to boost a real SOA, he brought.
carriers are attempting to make the SOA idea more pleasing to businesses with the aid of offering products and functions to decrease the fees of imposing the framework, Shiau said.
— with info from IDG news service
brief link 051750connected download Sponsor: IBMThe truth about counsel governance and the cloud
medical systems require the end-to-conclusion high availability and scalability. there are lots of components in a clinical gadget, and each particular person element contributes to the common device availability and scalability. We present the formulation to investigate the normal equipment availability and capacity planning, and we architect approaches and technologies to make all add-ons highly obtainable in all tiers through clustering, workload management, and replication. We focus on how to unify all clinical techniques and design the uniform framework for distinctive sorts of medical programs to connect to this framework so that we will maintain a totally attainable and enormously scalable gadget effectively. We use the n-tier allotted element based architecture and J2EE applied sciences in addition to internet capabilities to have interaction with .web and others. We talk about how to application in the framework for high availability and scalability and the way to upgrade software application without provider interruption to achieve continuous availability. We reveal a way to add or cut back hardware capacity in each tier and how to hold hardware and application with out carrier interruption in addition to a way to balance the skill and availability amongst tiers.
The lifetime fitness listing, which correlates every episode of care of a person into a continual fitness list, is the primary key delivery of the Malaysian integrated telehealth utility. A lifetime fitness record for an individual is the combination on his/her life timeline of all his/her digital fitness records from healthcare centres he/she has been to given that delivery. The digital medical statistics to be accrued that kind the lifetime fitness listing, can also be gathered from a variety of spectrums of fitness tips methods and healthcare levels, implying the necessity to deal with diverse communications and assistance technology infrastructures. Most essential consideration, despite the fact, is that the lifetime fitness listing may still comprise now not most effective longitudinal fitness summary tips, but additionally the opportunity of on-line retrieval of all patient health historical past on every occasion required, even all the way through computing device system downtime and unavailability of landline telecommunication community. It is just with such comprehensiveness of health records that the possibility of inappropriate birth of care could be decreased, and most of all of the actual continuum of care may be completed. This paper proposes the primary draft of a versatile framework for an built-in and distributed telemedicine gadget in Malaysia, meant to cope with these requirements. quick overview on the high-level framework is supplied, followed by way of a concise description of the three most important accessories of the framework.
be a part of ResearchGate to locate the americans and analysis you should support your work.
Articleresearch for SOA body in keeping with WebSphere Platform
October 2011to fulfill the necessities of enterprises in different setting up phases, frequently the usage of the newest technology beneath the situations that cause existing many and numerous hardware, operating techniques, middleware, programming languages, information storage, reusable redundant code within the commercial enterprise. service-Oriented architecture (SOA) is of course selected as an application structure by using many companies ... [Show full abstract] on account of its innate unfastened coupling and co-working. in this paper you are going to see the net carrier building tools offered by way of WebSphere platform and you may also see that web service feature which is provided via J2EE can effortlessly construct up SOA device  and discuss with the the current company process. examine greater
conference Papersoftware Integration of digital organizations in the South-to-North Water Division program
January 2009The South-to-North Water Division project is with the aid of some distance the area most desirable key water conservancy assignment under the direct management of the State Council of China. according to the points of the development and administration of South-to-North Water Division task, this paper items a constructing and managing digital enterprise model founded by means of the South-to-North Water Division development ... [Show full abstract] Bureau. also, this paper introduces SOA and net capabilities expertise and builds the application integration framework with the aid of these two applied sciences. additionally, the implementation steps of this framework through the use of IBM WebSphere are elaborated in this paper. read greater
ArticleIndustrieller Einsatz von software Server Technologie
September 2001In diesem Beitrag wollen wir anhand einer Integrationsarchitektur aus dem EAI-Umfeld motivieren und aufzeigen, wie utility Server Technologie sinnvoll bei der Zusammenführung von Systemen in einer vernetzten Umgebung eingesetzt werden kann. Dazu stellen wir erst unsere bisherige Integrationsarchitektur vor und erläutern an dieser einige Nachteile des traditionellen Vorgehens. Ein ... [Show full abstract] Abschnitt über software Server und die J2EE-Bestrebungen leiten über zu einem Neuvorschlag der Integrationsarchitektur, realisiert auf basis eben dieser software Server Technologie. read greater find more
final up-to-date: 22 Dec 2018
that you may request the entire-textual content of this convention paper directly from the authors on ResearchGate.Request full-textual content
devoid of George Galambos, we could nevertheless be caught carrying cash.
As a longtime employee at IBM Canada, Galambos changed into a designer on the crew that constructed the Interac network connecting bank machines everywhere. The influence was an open
equipment that allowed well-nigh any card to be used in just about any machine, inspite of the consumer’s economic establishment. Many corporations are actually attempting to achieve the equal aspect with their IT architecture. these days, web features regularly must run on a selected platform, but service-oriented architectures have the knowledge to create a more “loosely coupled” ambiance that would be extra interoperable.
this is the area the place Galambos, who has also designed case administration programs for salary Canada and Citizenship and Immigration Canada, spends plenty of his time. He was the primary Canadian large Blue worker to be appointed an IBM “Fellow,” which represents the company’s maximum technical success.
ITBusiness.ca spoke to Galambos when he become in Toronto touring shoppers on Tuesday.
ITBusiness.ca: where are you seeing essentially the most swift adoption of provider-oriented architectures, and what are the business drivers?
George Galambos: no longer distinctly, these are industries that are in the highest degree of turbulence, which is finance and insurance, likely because they are consistently attempting to locate how they can grow and at the equal time how they get market share of their massive valued clientele in spite of the fact that they don’t grow. The other one which is in fact somewhat keen is the retail industry. That’s a fascinating enviornment, since you wouldn’t have expected retail to be at the forefront of expertise, but definitely they all the time were. if you look on the fraction of company tactics and actions which had been automated by using guidance applied sciences or with particular gadgets to assist them to circulate along, retail is somewhat forward of the video game.
past that, any industry which is heavily counting on company tactics – i do know that every person has business strategies, however a few of them are more reliant than others – can be a very good candidate, and basically are tremendously drawn to carrier-oriented architectures. I agree with the basic price of carrier-oriented architectures is to convey business strategies rapidization, business process knowing, business system modelling an awful lot closer to the factor, where the advice expertise is all speakme the equal language because the enterprise does.
ITBusiness.ca: SOAs allow you to put in force a carrier in .net or J2EE but have the software consuming that carrier operating on a unique platform or language. How is that going to affect the growth of those competing systems? How heterogeneous will future IT environments be?
GG: so far as provider-oriented architecture is involved, it thrives on heterogeneity. The entire explanation why it has turn into so widespread is as a result of americans at all times wanted to are living in a heterogeneous world with out paying the fee for heterogeneity. In my long profession, truly, I have to admit I’m responsible of promoting homogeneity – and don’t think it’s as a result of I’m an IBM employee, now not at all – but as a result of I do consider that within the IT-driven opportunity for operational excellence in system design as antagonistic to pure programming, heterogeneity basically explanations interruption. And (users) are aware about the obstacle. in spite of this, during this new world, the place companies are counting on getting almost the ideal packages and the optimal capabilities they could discover attainable, it calls for heterogeneity on the outer boundaries. As you come closer to the consumer, issues turn into very homogeneous. That’s the fantastic thing about it: heterogeneous on the supply, enormously homogeneous when it’s being consumed. it could actually or can also not promote heterogeneity. It gets clearer that both .internet and J2EE have their successes and they're going to be there for a while however with the aid of there might be other exact languages that come along which provide a tighter and improved affinity to the underlying substrate, or give an easier solution to a hyperlink to how americans feel. i know that J2EE and .web are made to drive enterprise cost, but they can also be more suitable upon. One might say that service-oriented structure creates a extremely clear division between the deployment, which is not definitely entertaining, and the precise outcome, which is enjoyable. as long as all the effects are projected in a typical approach, it may no longer count.
ITBusiness.ca: what is going to then be the long run for object-oriented programming?
GG: I’m in fact speakme about element-oriented structure, and the intent I draw the big difference – although i'd now not dare to claim components don’t derive from object orientations, they do – but object orientation have been very good in fixing part of the company issue. They didn’t prove to be as effective if you desired to enter the second enterprise issue of the equal variety. accessories, although, being closer to enterprise services, they tend to be more convenient to respect as being constructive and as such they may additionally assist lots and promote reuse. My proposition here is that part-primarily based architectures are the ones which are in fact going to evolve. truly, each .net and J2EE are element-based architectures and they're going to take the advantages of those optimum examples of the article-oriented considering.
ITBusiness.ca: there are such a lot of requisites in this type of work. had been there any type of training you realized in designing the Interac network that you bring with you to the SOA realm?
GG: first off, I are looking to emphasize i used to be a mere member of the team of the Interac interface development. As you might also comprehend, Interac changed into a specification put together with the aid of the banks within the late 80s, early 90s and definitely they invited two companies to suggest and then create the different a part of the kit. IBM turned into one in every of them, and both carriers needed to improve from the equal set of specifications, and that’s a very interesting point. lots of the specifications have been described the Interac organizations themselves. That became very critical, by the way, as a result of right here were two skilled suppliers to needed to be sure they might fully interact and in reality move an interactivity test before they could make a practical community, but by way of defining requisites, you were rolling the die in favour of success. in case you go with the aid of the requisites, you most likely handed the examine. requisites which guide interactivity are extremely productive, effective, requirements. on the same time, necessities are very slow to merge. There are some circumstances the place the technology would were impeded if we had been to stay up for a typical.
ITBusiness.ca: What do you feel it is going to take to trigger the 2nd wave of SOA building as soon as the banks and retailers have based theirs?
GG: smartly, I’m now not sure I see such a clear division between the waves. It depends upon how we define the wave. one among them is inner and exterior use of services, publishing of features, that may be one wave. The other one is usually a section of publishing functions earlier than considering business approaches, or considering business processes automatically as a motivator of publishing the services. There are corporations who are well into carrier orientation with the express purpose of projecting their impact and capabilities backyard of the boundaries of a company. one in every of them is a really conventional bank card business that automated their dispute decision by means of making access to disparate facts, including most instant as well as document around a selected dispute to their purchasers. And that’s with out making an effort to internally remodeling a knowledge environment into an SOA. different businesses are working on creating capabilities interior, essentially where it’s a means to advertise reuse, and it is much greater promising than object-oriented programming was once.
Whilst it is very hard task to choose reliable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people get ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com make it certain to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. We never compromise on our review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self confidence is important to all of us. Specially we manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you see any bogus report posted by our competitor with the name killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just keep in mind that there are always bad people damaging reputation of good services due to their benefits. There are a large number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our test questions and sample brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
HP0-921 real questions | HP2-H09 examcollection | 1Z0-347 questions and answers | 650-059 questions and answers | 98-380 practice questions | 351-080 dump | JN0-541 exam prep | 000-866 dumps questions | M2010-727 brain dumps | C2180-319 questions answers | COG-132 sample test | ST0-086 real questions | 000-723 braindumps | 920-195 dumps | 000-M95 practice exam | NPTE VCE | JN0-347 free pdf | CWDP-302 exam questions | 1Z0-337 mock exam | 000-992 study guide |
Pass4sure 000-665 Architectural Design of SOA Solutions exam braindumps with real questions and practice software.
killexams.com IBM Certification think about aides are setup by IT specialists. Packs of understudies have been whimpering that there are an over the top number of questions in such a noteworthy number of preparing exams and study help, and they are as of late can not bear to deal with the expense of any more. Seeing killexams.com masters work out this sweeping version while still affirmation that all the learning is anchored after significant research and exam.
We have Tested and Approved 000-665 Exams. killexams.com presents the maximum accurate and ultra-modern IT exam materials which nearly include all information references. With the useful resource of our 000-665 exam materials, you dont need to waste a while on analyzing bulk of reference books and simply need to spend 10-20 hours to grasp our 000-665 actual questions and answers. And we offer you with PDF Version & Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its offered to offer the applicants simulate the IBM 000-665 exam in a actual environment.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all tests on internet site
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $ninety nine
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
If you're seeking out 000-665 Practice Test containing Real Test Questions, you are at proper place. We have compiled database of questions from Actual Exams in order to help you prepare and pass your exam on the first try. All training materials at the site are Up To Date and tested via our specialists.
killexams.com provide cutting-edge and up to date Practice Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for brand new syllabus of IBM 000-665 Exam. Practice our Real Questions and Answers to Improve your understanding and pass your exam with High Marks. We make sure your achievement in the Test Center, protecting all of the subjects of exam and build your Knowledge of the 000-665 exam. Pass four sure with our accurate questions.
100% Pass Guarantee
Our 000-665 Exam PDF includes Complete Pool of Questions and Answers and Brain dumps checked and established inclusive of references and references (wherein applicable). Our goal to collect the Questions and Answers isn't always best to pass the exam at the start strive however Really Improve Your Knowledge about the 000-665 exam subjects.
000-665 exam Questions and Answers are Printable in High Quality Study Guide that you could download in your Computer or some other tool and begin making ready your 000-665 exam. Print Complete 000-665 Study Guide, carry with you while you are at Vacations or Traveling and Enjoy your Exam Prep. You can get right of entry to up to date 000-665 Exam Q&A out of your online account every time.
nside seeing the bona fide exam material of the brain dumps at killexams.com you could without numerous an enlarge broaden your declare to fame. For the IT specialists, it's miles fundamental to modify their capacities as showed by way of their work need. We make it primary for our customers to hold certification exam with the assist of killexams.com confirmed and sincere to goodness exam material. For an splendid destiny in its domain, our brain dumps are the excellent choice. A nice dumps creating is a primary section that makes it straightforward for you to take IBM certifications. In any case, 000-665 braindumps PDF offers settlement for applicants. The IT announcement is a important troublesome attempt if one doesnt locate proper course as obvious aid material. Thus, we have true and updated material for the arranging of certification exam. It is essential to acquire to the guide cloth in case one desires towards keep time. As you require packs of time to look for revived and true exam material for taking the IT certification exam. If you locate that at one location, what can be higher than this? Its simply killexams.com that has what you require. You can store time and keep a strategic distance from hassle in case you purchase Adobe IT certification from our website online.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all tests on internet site
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $ninety nine
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
Download your Architectural Design of SOA Solutions Study Guide straight away after shopping for and Start Preparing Your Exam Prep Right Now!
Killexams 920-326 study guide | Killexams 77-885 practice questions | Killexams ASWB practice test | Killexams C2150-508 cheat sheets | Killexams HPE0-J78 braindumps | Killexams NQ0-231 exam questions | Killexams C2150-596 mock exam | Killexams 70-498 free pdf | Killexams EX0-001 questions and answers | Killexams ST0-114 VCE | Killexams 70-542-VB study guide | Killexams MSC-131 test prep | Killexams CCP bootcamp | Killexams C4030-670 free pdf | Killexams EX0-114 exam prep | Killexams MSNCB dump | Killexams 1Y0-610 examcollection | Killexams 000-M03 cram | Killexams 200-045 real questions | Killexams ISEB-ITILV3F practice exam |
Killexams 1Y0-311 braindumps | Killexams JN0-310 test prep | Killexams 000-591 practice exam | Killexams 190-803 practice questions | Killexams 1Z0-418 free pdf | Killexams M70-201 examcollection | Killexams 190-802 VCE | Killexams HP0-752 Practice Test | Killexams LOT-441 free pdf download | Killexams EX0-008 sample test | Killexams 000-907 study guide | Killexams M8060-729 brain dumps | Killexams 1Z0-063 brain dumps | Killexams 190-849 cram | Killexams HP0-J43 bootcamp | Killexams HP5-H05D exam prep | Killexams C9020-667 braindumps | Killexams 7120X free pdf | Killexams TMPF exam questions | Killexams 2B0-015 dump |
SOA at one point was discussed as a game changer, something that was going to revolutionize software development and delivery processes, unite business and IT, and significantly lower software maintenance costs.
SOA was (and still often is) a gold mine for software vendors, who were very active in defining numerous (often contradicting) supporting standards and delivering software products which were supposed to simplify design and implementation of SOA systems, but in reality often added confusion by defining those products as SOA.
Many companies embarked on servicizing their software implementations and some achieved great success, while others failed. SOA was on the top of analysts’ reports, then was proclaimed dead and then reborn under slightly different names – REST, cloud computing, etc. There are literary thousands of SOA books and articles covering many aspects of SOA from architectural design to nitty-gritty implementation details
And still, after all this, there are a lot of disagreements between SOA practitioners not only how to successfully create SOA solutions, but even what exactly SOA means and what the necessary SOA components are.
In this virtual panel, InfoQ talks to 5 SOA experts about the significance of SOA, its relationships with other architectural styles, best technologies and approaches used for successful implementations of SOA solutions and SOA future.
The panelists who have answered our questions are:
The following questions were put to them:Q1:SOA means a lot of things these days: What is your sound bite definition? Can you compare and contrast SOA with “Integration”, ROA, and EDA?
Mike Rosen: SOA is an architectural approach to developing solutions where a 'service' is the main concept of analysis, design, implementation, deployment, and operations". To get the most benefits from SOA, it is best done at a scope that spans organizational boundaries. Service designs must incorporate both business and information requirements.
While SOA is one approach to implementing integration, and when done well, is often a more flexible approach, integration it is only one aspect of SOA. In the past, integration has most often been done in a limited scope where enterprise wide consistency was a secondary concern. A SOA approach typically uses integration techniques to transform and expose resources as services that can be available on an enterprise scope.
ROA and EDA are other architectural styles that have 'resources' or 'events' respectively as their primary design driver. These architectural styles have different overall goals for system flexibility and optimization. They are not subsets or supersets of SOA, nor are they incompatible with SOA. Effective enterprise solutions can be constructed by combining then together to take advantage of each approach. But that's a bit too much to go into here.
Steve Jones: SOA still means the same thing that it previously meant, namely thinking about architecture in terms of services, capabilities and their interactions. SOA is to architecture as OO was to development, a new way of thinking about the whole of IT from a business perspective, it’s that which makes SOA powerful not the specific delivery approach. So thinking architecturally in a Service Oriented Way you can then choose whether to implement parts using Resource Orientation or EDA, those two approaches are about the "how" of delivery not about providing a consistent mental framework into which various different technical approaches can be combined.
The only thing that really changed in SOA is that the vendors have put different buzzwords on the same products so aren't confusing what SOA is so much these days.
Stefan Tilkov: SOA means whatever suits the one using the term best. Seriously, I've totally given up on trying to define it, since whatever definition you come up with, there's simply no agreement to be found, and ultimately it ends up being a waste of time. Having said that, I'd like to focus on the high-level aspects that at least seem to find approval by a significant minority: A holistic approach to enterprise IT; some concept of service consumption over a network without a need to know about implementation details; trying to apply sound architectural principles to the overall system landscape; with integration not added as an afterthought and a necessary evil, but something deemed so essential that it becomes the default. I'm a big proponent of using REST as the most applicable architectural style to achieve those goals, but I concede that not everyone agrees - they just don't know any better :-)
I don't like the term "ROA"; "REST" is perfectly fine and abstract enough for my taste, no need to add something (I use "RESTful HTTP" to refer to the Web's architecture as an instantiation of that style). Events are a part of almost every architecture I've ever dealt with, but I've never seen one where _only_ events were used, or even played the central part, so I'm not sure Event-driven architecture as a concept of its own is something worth exploring. To make the connection to REST again, I do see event notifications via feeds as an interesting alternative for many scenarios - quite often polling is perfectly fine and the most scalable solution available.
Jim Webber: SOA is the design and delivery of systems-of-systems which resemble the businesses they support. Integration is joining things together - SOA gives it context. Integration tasks alone have very little value - integration is not an end in itself - though often we work with systems-of-systems that take integration for granted. I'd add here as a side note that "integration projects" are a smell.
ROA is nonsense since nobody in their right mind architects around resources alone (unless they're really doing RPC and want to make it sound less horrid). However SOA can give broad guidance to those responsible for designing systems-of-systems based on Web architecture. The key here is that SOA provides the mould - services which encapsulate a business need - while the Web provides a pervasive and robust infrastructure for supporting business protocols between those services.
EDA has been painted as a specialized activity involving low-latency busses and the like to support complex near real-time events. Actually the same design principles that work there also work at more humane latencies - all systems simply respond to events, EDA takes that with a low latency constraint.
Claus T Jensen: My sound bite, holistic, definition of SOA is this: SOA is an architectural style, a thought model, that enables Business & IT collaboration and alignment and is centered around the interaction between services and processes. Integration is certainly part of what a service oriented architecture should be concerned about, but is by far not the only thing. A lot of SOA initiatives have historically been driven by IT and focused on application integration; yet while immediate value can be achieved that way, the alignment with the business and the effectiveness of the enterprise portfolio is not enabled by integration alone. Service oriented architectures can be event driven or not - I do not personally see EDA as a different architectural style, rather perceive it as simply one aspect of service orientation.
Back to topQ2: There has been a lot of discussions about relationships between SOA and BPM, ranging from statements that they are the same to the statements that the need to be explicitly separated. What is your opinion?
Mike Rosen: BPM is an approach to orchestrating modular business functionality and information to support business processes. The 'M' of BPM stands for management. So orchestration is just one of many aspects of BPM. SOA is the technology that provides the modular functionality in the form of business services. Businesses services might be implemented by orchestrating smaller domain and utility services, but in SOA the emphasis is typically on encapsulating the orchestration, whereas in BPM, the emphasis is on exposing, managing, monitoring, and optimizing the process. BPM without SOA tends to create siloed solutions. SOA without BPM creates services without a business consumer. Together, they provide a total solution.
Steve Jones: I've said before that BPM screws up SOA (see this link) and I still think that is true. SOA actually makes great BPM and BPM is a great approach to implement the capabilities of a business service. What I mean by this is that if you think first in terms of services then you can choose to use BPM where it’s appropriate and thus combine it with non-BPM approaches (e.g. ROA, EDA, package, etc) in a consistent manner. Starting with BPM tends to drive fine-grained single operator services which isn't a good thing in terms of creating a robust architecture. The important thing therefore is to understand your services and capabilities first, then choose to implement capabilities using BPM, this gives both good SOA and good BPM.
Stefan Tilkov: I believe that BPM is a concept of its own and you can do just SOA, just BPM, or both together. I don't see processes at the core of SOA, even though I understand that BPM vendors might like to see things differently. Sometimes it's perfectly fine to hard-code processes, sometimes it's not; even then, typical BPM solutions are never the only option.
Jim Webber: Services implement business protocols, otherwise they're not decent services. Choreographing the interactions between those services could be classified as BPM, but that term is so overloaded with product offerings I don't find it useful anymore. As a Web fan, I like to see that hypermedia is used to convey business protocols over the Web (whether that's the big Web, or the little Web inside your organization). So I think choreography is alive and well. But I wouldn't conflate that with BPM.
Claus T Jensen: BPM is a discipline focused on operational optimization, and SOA is an architectural style focused on business and IT alignment. Included in SOA is the thought that one should care about interacting services and processes, in other words SOA is a very natural architectural style to adopt for an organization that cares about BPM. Having said that it is possible to derive value from BPM without SOA, though you do expose yourself to "service sprawl". It is also possible to derive value from SOA without BPM, but in all honesty BPM is a natural component in an SOA strategy as it provides a built-in business context for the architecture itself as well as immediate business operational benefits.
Back to topQ3: A new analyst's darling is cloud computing. What is the relationship to SOA? Related to this is Big Data, how is it related to SOA?
Mike Rosen: The cloud is about providing services, whether it's infrastructure, platform or software as a service. So, SOA and the cloud share a common fundamental. The implication for the cloud is that the same service design principles that make a good SOA service need to be applied to a cloud service: well defined interfaces, loose coupling, proper decomposition, common semantics, etc. Unfortunately, just like many SOA designers don't really understand this, many cloud service designers don't either. So buyer beware. Make sure the services you're getting are well designed, implemented, and operated.
A SOA solution should be able to integrate cloud based services as well as on-site services, and it should easily be possible to provision your own service on a cloud infrastructure. Like anything else, there are good ways to do this, and not so good ways, so some implementations will introduce problems with security, performance, reliability, and accountability. This will be a failure of the implementation, not of the cloud or SOA. Expect to see cloud based services increase the need for custom integration and exacerbate the lack of common semantics among applications. As an architect, you should be developing guidelines for cloud usage now to minimize these issues before they become disasters.
Steve Jones: In the book I talk about understanding the business value of a service, cloud really plays in to this as it helps to better align the delivery costs of services to their business value. That business value might be about reducing costs or shifting to utility pricing or it might be about investing in innovations and massive scale.
So SOA provides the way of understanding what the business value is and therefore where elements like cloud and Big Data can deliver value. If you have an area where it’s all about cost of service and driving costs down it might be worth shifting the application into the cloud to reduce the cost but it probably won't be worth investing in a Big Data solution as there just isn't the value to be realized.
Stefan Tilkov: There obviously is a relation in that whatever services (in the most abstract sense of the term) you consume, you're likely to do so over a network and you won't care about the implementation details. This works nicely for most IaaS solutions such as Amazon's, but I still find it hard to map something like Google's App Engine onto some SOA concept, and often feel the connection is made by those want to attach their SOA thoughts from the past to the success of the Cloud Computing model today.
Jim Webber: Not in the slightest, other than you can run your own services on other people's infrastructure, or buy (and bind) further up the stack by renting their business processes encapsulated as services. This notion of SOA in the cloud or cloud being the next generation of SOA is rather dull at this level. I'm convinced it's super exciting and tricky to run systems at such scale, but the cloud is not the savior of SOA, rather it's the next shiny object that will attract certain thought leaders, analysts and so on. If your service deals with big data, that's how they're related. Otherwise they're not: data is data, services are about behavior atop line of business data.
Claus T Jensen: Cloud is the result of combining SOA and dynamic infrastructure. A Cloud Infrastructure is:
But even more importantly the Cloud business model is a utility model based on pre-defined utility services that can be consumed (and paid for) on-demand. I often get the question "how do I figure out what others should pay to use my Cloud services" - in reality someone asking that question is not really doing Cloud, rather is applying dynamic infrastructure within a classical IT business model.
Back to topQ4: One of the reasons of falling popularity of SOA is projects failure. What’s the #1 thing you think SOA projects should do to succeed?
Mike Rosen: I wouldn't agree that SOA is falling in popularity. I would say that it is no longer of interest to the hype and marketing machine. Every application infrastructure and major application provider is SOA based, or moving to be so. It would be foolish to create a new solution today that wasn't service oriented. I'm not convinced that SOA projects fail any more than other software projects of their size, but I haven't looked at the numbers. SOA projects fail when organizations try to bite off too much to start, and when they don't have an architectural vision. So, the #1 thing is to have a SOA architectural vision that incorporates a SOA catalog and enterprise semantics. It should not take more than a few weeks for a good architect to formulate the vision. Then, the #2 thing is to do small, incremental projects that implement a few services at a time that provide immediate value to some project. Incorporate lessons learned into the next project and grow the architecture and service base over time.
Steve Jones: I think another key reason is that most projects were not actually doing SOA, they were doing Web Services based integration. I'm regularly told that an organization is "doing SOA" but when I ask for their solution services architecture, let alone their business service architecture, it is nowhere to be seen, all that actually exists is an old style architecture with Web Services at integration points. These people have then moved to the next shiny technical approach and that will fail for them as well, failure rates in IT remain stubbornly high. Why is that? Mainly because most of IT seems to believe, despite all evidence to the contrary, that a new technology will become the Silver Bullet that doesn't and will never exist.
A good example of these failures is the lack of MDM within most SOA programs. If you have diverse areas of the business trying to communicate then you need clarity on the key entities within the business that you are communicating around. Almost every single SOA initiative however fails to grasp this information challenge which means implementation is more complex and the business value is less clear.
So the first thing to make SOA succeed is actually DO SOA, that means thinking about your services and capabilities first, THEN working out how to deliver the services. You should be able to see services through-out the project, in the development teams, in the code repository, in the deployment guides and in the management reporting. That will help project success rates increase as it breaks projects down into more independent areas which helps approaches like agile and also compartmentalizes risk within programs. This requires a step up in discipline and a recognition that the same people, process and mentality but with a new technology will not deliver a new result, you have to change how people think, how they work and potentially add new technology in order to deliver new results.
Stefan Tilkov: Adopt REST? Just kidding. To me, the major factor is to actually start small and deliver something of value, an actual service that people want to use and actually start using. Unless you manage to do that, you shouldn't be allowed to spend any company money on things such as ESBs, registries, repositories, or any other magical piece of infrastructure that is only a means to an end, but creates no value in itself.
Jim Webber: Deliver incrementally. Don't do the 3 year "transformation program" because you'll fail. Think about SOA not as a protracted effort, but as a series of short, winnable skirmishes that happen as change is driven through your market or organization. I've talked about this a lot in the past: the practice is called Guerrilla SOA. Do that, and you have a fighting chance.
Claus T Jensen: They should understand that SOA is not about technology, and that adopting SOA cannot be done in a project it has to be done organizationally (or at least at a program level). Steve Mills, Senior VP and Group Executive IBM Software Group, stated back in 2007 that “ Service orientation does not begin with technology; it begins with the mind-set of thinking about your business and the world around you in terms of functional components.” I completely agree with that, service orientation begins with the thought model.
Back to topQ5: Do you foresee a SOA 2.0? How would it look?
Mike Rosen: Most SOA today is implemented in the enterprise tier of an application to provide 'business' services and support business process. Enterprise 2.0 solutions require an additional but different type of service in the application tier. SOA is still the right kind of architecture for building rich, collaborative, user experiences in the application tier that access flexible business processes in the enterprise. So, I think SOA 2.0 is an expansion of SOA across the end-to-end solution stack. This means that solution architects understand how to use it, and that infrastructure provides its capabilities (such as location, presence, collaboration) via well designed service interfaces.
Steve Jones: No, I don't see an SOA 2.0 in the same way as I never saw an OO 2.0. Its a way of thinking about IT and its relationship with the business, maybe 2.0 is just people actually doing SOA rather than concentrating on the next shiny technology. Key things that people should be looking at are the IT and business building blocks they need to make SOA successful. So looking at the business value and looking at how to drive IT simplicity by using elements such as MDM as a key IT/Business enabler.
There is no SOA 2.0, there is just doing SOA properly.
Stefan Tilkov: I don't think anything called "SOA 2.0" will have a chance of being successful - the term has been abused way too thoroughly in the past. I strongly believe the core values behind SOA have merit, but there needs to be a new label attached to it. Coming to think about it, maybe it would be even better if the industry stopped using labels altogether, and tried to do whatever makes sense. One can dream, right?
Jim Webber: I think the shift to the Web is inevitable. I imagine that Web APIs will become more RESTful over time, and that we will habitually open up our data in a responsible manner. The building blocks are already there - we are getting much better at understanding how to share business protocols over the Web; authentication and authorization are usable (if not exactly perfect). So SOA 2.0 will leverage this ubiquitous, secure, robust platform for widespread data sharing - it really will be the Web of everything.
Claus T Jensen: At some point in the future there is going to be yet another paradigm shift in terms of architectural thinking. It is hard, if not impossible, to imagine exactly what it would be - such is the nature of paradigm shifts, they cannot be predicted. I don't see any such change in the foreseeable future though, there is still plenty of potential in applying SOA as the key architectural approach to agility and effectiveness.Conclusion
It seems like even experts cannot agree on exact meaning of SOA, which way it is moving and what is its future. This is what makes our jobs – software architects – so challenging and interesting. It seems like there is no “silver bullet” and we will need to continue experimenting with building new and better SOA implementations.About the Panelists
Mike Rosen is Chief Scientist at Wilton Consulting Group which specializes in architectural consulting. He is also Director of Enterprise Architecture at the Cutter Consortium which provides research and analysis on IT and Editorial Director of SOA Institute. He is an accomplished architect and technical leader with extensive experience in enterprise architecture (EA), service-oriented architecture (SOA), software architecture, distributed technologies, and industry standards. Mr. Rosen’s 30 year career has spanned startups, CTO roles, chief architect, and product architect for industry leading middleware products. Throughout his career, Mr. Rosen has been a frequent technical speaker and author for conferences in more than a dozen countries. He is coauthor of several books including: Applied SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture and Design Strategies; Developing E-Business Systems and Architectures: A Manager’s Guide; and Integrating CORBA and COM Applications.
Stefan Tilkov is a co-founder and principal consultant at innoQ, a technology consulting company with offices in Germany and Switzerland. He has been involved in the design of large-scale, distributed systems for more than a decade, using a variety of technologies and tools ranging from C++ and CORBA over J2EE/Java EE and Web Services to REST and Ruby on Rails. He led InfoQ's SOA queue for a couple of years, has authored numerous articles and a book ("REST und HTTP", German), and is a frequent speaker at conferences around the world.
Dr. Jim Webber is Chief Scientist with Neo Technology the company behind the popular open source graph database Neo4j, where he works on graph database server technology and writes open source software. Jim is interested in using big graphs like the Web for building distributed systems, which led him to being a co-author on the book REST in Practice, having previously written Developing Enterprise Web Services - An Architect's Guide. Jim is an active speaker, presenting regularly around the world. His blog is located here and he tweets often @jimwebber.
Steve Jones is Global Head of Master Data Management at Capgemini where he is responsible for the coordination and establishment of Capgemini's global MDM offers including the scaling of the offshore Centre of Excellence and the publication and industrialization of a business centric method for MDM consulting and delivery. Steve helps clients to deliver IT estates which look like the business, evolve like the business and are costed in line with the value they deliver. Working with business and IT leaders, he helps organizations take control of their master data and align its governance to its business value.
Claus Torp Jensen is a Senior Technical Staff Member on the Business Process Optimization (BPO) Foundation team and Chief Architect for SOA-BPM-EA technical strategy, driving their alignment and integration both conceptually and practically. The BPO Foundation team has architectural responsibility for all of IBM's software products to ensure that they support the key principles of SOA, Business Process Management (BPM) and Business Agility from a client perspective. Prior to joining IBM in March 2008, Claus was Group Chief Architect, VP of Architecture and Business Development, in Danske Bank, a regional European bank.He was responsible for driving Danske Bank's SOA initiative and SOA center of excellence since its inception in 1999, and is known as an SOA expert and evangelist. Claus holds a PhD in Computer Science from Aarhus University, Denmark.
NEW ORLEANS — Feb. 26, 2007 — Providing government and healthcare organizations worldwide with a free and extensible architectural foundation to simplify interoperability and integration between healthcare solutions, Microsoft Corp. today announced the broad availability of the Connected Health Framework Architecture and Design Blueprint. The announcement comes as attendees from all segments of the healthcare industry convene to explore cutting-edge technologies, marketplace changes, new models of delivery and care, and other leading issues at this year’s Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Conference taking place in New Orleans through March 1.
The Microsoft® Connected Health Framework Architecture and Design Blueprint provides a real-world model for providers seeking to deploy service-oriented architecture (SOA) solutions to address increasing pressures on an overburdened and fragmented healthcare system. In addition to the Blueprint, Microsoft is making available the Health Connection Engine, a standards-based set of Web services that enable health organizations to quickly deploy solutions to improve interoperability, clinical collaboration and decision-making tools.
“IT-enabled process improvement is at the heart of federal healthcare policy initiatives and a key agenda item for healthcare industry leaders,” said Marc Holland, program director for Health Provider Research at Health Industry Insights, an IDC company. “The ability to integrate patient information stored in a variety of data sources across the entire continuum of care is essential to this effort, and SOA is a critical enabling technology. With the ability to efficiently connect disparate legacy systems and build new applications quickly and economically, solutions like Microsoft’s Connected Health Framework Architecture can provide an effective framework for implementing SOA and building the applications that can achieve this goal.”
The Connected Health Framework Architecture and Design Blueprint offers a vendor-agnostic approach for addressing integration and solutions within healthcare organizations and provides guidance to help these organizations address key issues, such as service delivery capability, capacity and reliability. The Blueprint is now available at no cost (connect-time charges may apply) for download from the Microsoft Developer Network (MSDN®) Healthcare Industry Center, which also launches today, at http://msdn.microsoft.com/healthcare.
“Our mission is to create a framework and a partner ecosystem with the potential to transform the provider experience and ultimately the delivery model for patient care,” said Tim Smokoff, managing director of health with the Worldwide Public Sector team at Microsoft. “We are committed to this global mission, and we are confident that Microsoft’s technology, coupled with our partner solutions, will bring positive change to the healthcare industry.”
Either working independently or with Microsoft partners, healthcare organizations can utilize the Architecture and Design Blueprint to quickly create solutions that respond to changing business and patient care needs, lessening the need for expensive and lengthy consulting engagements. The Blueprint captures best practices from a number of industries and customer projects around the world, such as The Asklepios Group in Germany and Sutter Health in California.
For Sutter Health, an association of hospitals serving more than 100 communities in Northern California, the guidance in the Connected Health Framework Architecture and Design Blueprint has yielded benefits. Earlier this year, Sutter implemented an early detection and treatment program for severe sepsis in intensive care unit patients by leveraging an electronic forms-based solution. Using Microsoft Office InfoPath® 2003, Microsoft Office SharePoint® Portal Server 2003 and Microsoft SQL Server™ 2005, Sutter was able to build its solution based on the Framework’s architecture guidelines, helping Sutter administrators save patient lives and nearly $1 million in costs.
“We have been able to save more than 50 patients in the last three to four months,” said Dr. John Mesic, chief medical officer for the Sacramento-Sierra Region of Sutter Health. “The Connected Health Framework Architecture and Design Blueprint enabled us to build a solution quickly and collect more data to effectively deliver patient care formulas that are faster, accurate and more proactive than our previous solution.”
Back in 2005, Asklepios, together with Microsoft and Intel Corporation, embarked on a leading-edge Hospital of the Future program with a goal to set new standards of quality and efficiency in the German healthcare system, and support the reform process in the healthcare sector in Germany by developing related technologies and eHealth offers. Using an early model of the Connected Health Framework Architecture and Design Blueprint, an end-to-end electronic case record system was created that focused on integrated medicine and telemedicine. It was designed to improve patient care and the exchange of information within the hospital and across a patient’s health care network; reduce the length of hospital stays; streamline operations; and allow doctors and nurses to spend more time with patients.
“We wanted to create value-added offers for the doctors who work together with us and their patients,” said Dr. Jörg Weidenhammer, executive manager of the LBK at Asklepios. “Moreover, we are also interested in improving the cooperation between hospitals within the group as well as being able to include medical insurance companies, nursing facilities and other partners in the overall picture. The Connected Health Framework guidance was instrumental in helping us achieve these goals.”
The initial work was a success, with Asklepios realizing increases in inpatient care levels, a lower TCO and greater efficiency across the organization, and the program is being rolled out across other health care institutions in the organization.
The Connected Health Framework Architecture and Design Blueprint is the first offering from Microsoft in a series of guidance documents and toolsets for the worldwide healthcare provider community. More information on the Microsoft Connected Health Framework Architecture and Design Blueprint is available at the MSDN Healthcare Industry Center Web site at http://msdn.microsoft.com/healthcare.
About Microsoft in Healthcare and Life Sciences
Microsoft provides standards-based products and technology to help the healthcare and life sciences industries break down information barriers between the disparate IT environments across pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies, physicians and healthcare professionals, provider organizations, government and private-sector employers, health insurers, and consumers. Microsoft’s vision for knowledge-driven health utilizes the company’s cutting-edge technology to help these groups integrate their systems, dramatically enhance collaboration, and increase information sharing and learning — ultimately resulting in the ability to deliver high-quality products and services to patients and consumers worldwide. More information about Microsoft in Healthcare and Life Sciences can be found at http://www.microsoft.com/healthcare.
Founded in 1975, Microsoft (Nasdaq “MSFT”) is the worldwide leader in software, services and solutions that help people and businesses realize their full potential.
Note to editors: If you are interested in viewing additional information on Microsoft, please visit the Microsoft Web page at http://www.microsoft.com/presspass on Microsoft’s corporate information pages. Web links, telephone numbers and titles were correct at time of publication, but may since have changed. For additional assistance, journalists and analysts may contact Microsoft’s Rapid Response Team or other appropriate contacts listed at http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/contactpr.mspx.
MALVERN, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Siemens Medical Solutions (www.usa.siemens.com/healthcareit) and Partners HealthCare have a long-standing research and development relationship focusing on the advancement of medical technology. Now, the two industry-leading organizations are exploring a new collaboration which will bring innovative Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) to healthcare information technology (IT).
Recognizing Partners’ leadership and depth of medical informatics and clinical domain knowledge, Siemens and Partners have entered into discussions on how to leverage their respective areas of expertise to jointly develop clinical services within the Soarian® SOA platform.
Siemens has been extensively engaged in developing SOA – a robust, flexible architectural design strategy that is being deployed across its Soarian suite of applications. With the quest for safe, efficient, and superior patient care at the heart of every healthcare organization, Soarian helps facilitate more informed decision-making and more efficient business practices through healthcare process management. SOA delivers the capability to individually extend, reuse and access services – software components that implement a business task or process. Orchestrating these services into complex business processes helps deliver the benefits of healthcare process management throughout an organization.
“We expect the alliance between our organizations to be unprecedented in our industry, melding Siemens’ healthcare IT expertise with Partners’ clinical and informatics knowledge,” said Janet Dillione, president, Siemens Medical Solutions Healthcare IT Division. “With Soarian, Siemens plans to achieve what no other vendor has been able to accomplish: effective healthcare process management. Process modeling, workflow engine, business activity monitoring, and SOA are essential for effective healthcare process management, and only Soarian contains them all. We’re especially pleased that Partners HealthCare, such a highly respected institution is exploring this SOA collaboration with us, taking healthcare IT innovation to a new level of ease-of-use and depth of functionality.”
Soarian is built with fundamental change in mind. The growing pressure to embrace interoperability and integration of technology and knowledge, within the framework of initiatives like pay-for-performance, Regional Health Information Organizations (RHIOs), Personal Health Records (PHRs) and the electronic health record (EHR) demand no less than a completely new approach to the development of solutions, including the evolution of SOA.
“Siemens has a vision for the future of healthcare information technology and the resource depth and knowledge to advance SOA development and delivery,” said John Glaser, vice president and chief information officer, Partners HealthCare System. “We’re excited about this extraordinary opportunity to work together and equally pleased that Siemens is committed to changing the healthcare IT industry with its innovation and groundbreaking strategy.”
About Partners HealthCare
Partners HealthCare is a Boston-based integrated health system founded by Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital that also includes community and specialty hospitals, community health centers, a physician network, and home health and long-term care services. Further information can be found by visiting www.partners.org.
About Siemens Medical Solutions
Siemens Medical Solutions of Siemens AG (NYSE:SI) is one of the world’s largest suppliers to the healthcare industry. The company is known for bringing together innovative medical technologies, healthcare information systems, management consulting, and support services, to help customers achieve tangible, sustainable, clinical and financial outcomes. Recent acquisitions in the area of in-vitro diagnostics such as Diagnostic Products Corporation and Bayer Diagnostics – mark a significant milestone for Siemens as it becomes the first full service diagnostics company. Employing more than 41,000 people worldwide and operating in over 130 countries, Siemens Medical Solutions reported sales of 8.23 billion EUR, orders of 9.33 billion EUR and group profit of 1.06 billion EUR for fiscal 2006 (Sept. 30). Further information can be found by visiting www.siemens.com/medical.
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [14 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11925052
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12893634
Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/12/pass4sure-000-665-practice-tests-with.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/Pass4sure000-665DumpsAndPracticeTestsWithRealQuestions
Wordpress : https://wp.me/p7SJ6L-2eU
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/vb9m7dhevpipzfaf9da7r4k911cu87no