|Exam Name||:||DB2 9 Database and Application(R) Fundamentals - Academic Initiative|
|Questions and Answers||:||188 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||April 19, 2019|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||Pass4sure 000-302 Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure 000-302 Full Version|
Exam Questions Updated On :
000-302 exam Dumps Source : DB2 9 Database and Application(R) Fundamentals - Academic Initiative
Test Code : 000-302
Test Name : DB2 9 Database and Application(R) Fundamentals - Academic Initiative
Vendor Name : IBM
Q&A : 188 Real Questions
Shortest questions that works in real test environment.
I handed the 000-302 exam thanks to this package deal deal. The questions are accurate, and so are the subjects and test guides. The layout is very convenient and allows you to test in one-of-a-kind codecs - education on the trying out engine, reading PDFs and printouts, so that you can training consultation the fashion and balance thats right for you. I for my part loved schooling on the finding out engine. It absolutely simulates the exam, that is particularly essential for 000-302 exam, with all their specific question sorts. So, its a bendy but reliable way to gain your 000-302 certification. Ill be using killexams.com for my next level certification tests, too.
right place to get 000-302 actual test examination paper.
The team behind killexams.com should seriously pat their back for a job well done! I have no doubts while saying that with killexams.com, there is no chance that you dont get to be a 000-302. Definitely recommending it to the others and all the best for the future you guys! What a great study time has it been with the resource material for 000-302 available on the website. You were like a friend, a true friend indeed.
How plenty 000-302 examination price?
I am ranked very excessive among my class buddies on the listing of remarkable college college students however it handiest happened after I registered on this killexams.com for some exam assist. It modified into the high ranking reading software in this killexams.com that helped me in becoming a member of the excessive ranks at the aspect of different super college students of my magnificence. The resources on this killexams.com are commendable because of the reality they may be unique and extremely beneficial for instruction through 000-302, 000-302 dumps and 000-302 books. I am happy to install writing those phrases of appreciation due to the reality this killexams.com merits it. Thanks.
No worries whilst getting geared up for the 000-302 examination.
Best 000-302 exam preparation I have ever come across. I passed 000-302 exam hassle-free. No stress, no worries, and no frustrations during the exam. I knew everything I needed to know from this killexams.com 000-302 Questions set. The questions are valid, and I heard from my friend that their money back guarantee works, too. They do give you the money back if you fail, but the thing is, they make it very easy to pass. Ill use them for my next certification exams too.
got no hassle! three days training brand new 000-302 actual examination questions is required.
The killexams.com Questions & solutions made me green sufficient to cut up this exam. I endeavored 90/95 questions in due time and passed effectively. I by no means considered passing. A wonderful deal obliged killexams.com for help me in passing the 000-302. With a complete time artwork and an reliable diploma preparation aspect with the aid ofside made me notably occupied to equip myself for the 000-302 exam. By way of one manner or some other I came to bear in brain killexams.
can i discover dumps questions of 000-302 exam?
This is the nice 000-302 useful resource on net. killexams.com is one I consider. What they gave to me is greater treasured than money, they gave me training. I changed into analyzing for my 000-302 test once I made an account on here and what I got in return labored merely like magic for me and I was very amazed at how tremendous it felt. My 000-302 check appeared like a unmarried passed thing to me and I achieved success.
No waste of time on searhching internet! determined precise source of 000-302 Q&A.
Preparation package has been very beneficial in the course of my exam training. I got 100% im now not an first rate test taker and might skip clean on the exam, which isnt a brilliant thing, especially if that is 000-302 exam, while time is your enemy. I had revel in of failing IT tests in the past and wanted to keep away from it at all prices, so i bought this package deal deal. It has helped me pass with 100%. It had the entirety I had to realize, and for the reason that I had spent countless hours analyzing, cramming and making notes, I had no problem passing this exam with the very excellent marks viable.
Weekend Study is enough to pass 000-302 exam with these questions.
The killexams.com dump is straightforward to understand and enough to prepare for the 000-302 exam. No other observe material I used alongside aspect the Dumps. My heartfelt manner to you for developing such an notably powerful, simple material for the hardexam. I in no way notion I must pass this exam with out difficulty with none tries. You humans made it take vicinity. I responded 76 questions most correctly in the real exam. Thank you for imparting me an contemporary product.
where can i get 000-302 actual exam questions and answers?
It is excellent! I passed my 000-302 exam yesterday with a nearly perfect score of 98%. Thank you Killexams! The materials in the bundle are authentic and valid - this is what I got on my other exam. I knew answers to most of the questions, and some more questions were very similar and on the subjects fully covered in the study guide, so I was able to answer them by myself. Not only did I get an excellent learning tool which has helped me expand my professional knowledge, but I also received an easy pass to my 000-302 certification.
Feeling trouble in passing 000-302 exam? Q&A bank is here.
in case you want right 000-302 training on how it works and what are the tests and all then dont waste your time and choose killexams.com as its miles an last source of help. I additionally desired 000-302 education and i even opted for this super exam simulator and got myself the high-quality schooling ever. It guided me with each element of 000-302 exam and supplied the top class questions and solutions i have ever seen. The test courses additionally were of very muchhelp.
be part of us for a are living webinar, The information Layer: IBM’s Db2 in a Multi-Cloud World, the place IBM utility architect Bowen Turetzky will talk about:
The regular pay for a Database Administrator (DBA) with IBM DB2 advantage in Toronto, Ontario is pay per hour.
The normal pay for a Database Administrator (DBA) with IBM DB2 talents in Toronto, Ontario is C$seventy two,375 per yr.Job Description for Database Administrator (DBA)
A database administrator (DBA) is an IT professional who ensures that the application used to control a database is properly maintained to enable rapid access when mandatory. as a result of consistent entry, searches, traffic are likely to have a harmful effect on any company database, the DBA works to retain the effectivity of the servers. she or he also will usually work to make sure records protection, coordinating with an IT security knowledgeable or team in higher groups to aid hold the integrity of delicate company statistics.study extra...
one of the leading jobs of a database administrator is to keep a corporation's suggestions purchasable in an effective method. Many groups require that records be obtainable by means of cloud servers in order that it may be accessed at any time. actually, a DBA residences handiest a small percent of statistics in a cloud setting, as a result of the expense and security issues created when doing so. however, the DBA ensures that cloud entry to statistics can also be accomplished without delay and correctly.
To work as a database administrator, someone typically will need a bachelor's degree in laptop science, an affiliate's diploma in database administration, or a similar diploma. Many organizations will also require a DBA candidate to have a background in IT work on database administration groups. typically, an administrator works usual company hours right through the week, but many organizations require a DBA to be purchasable on name continually, in case of a device emergency. (Copyright 2019 PayScale.com)
Database Administrator (DBA) initiatives
Whilst it is very hard task to choose reliable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people get ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com make it certain to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. We never compromise on our review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self confidence is important to all of us. Specially we manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you see any bogus report posted by our competitor with the name killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just keep in mind that there are always bad people damaging reputation of good services due to their benefits. There are a large number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our test questions and sample brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
1T6-511 free pdf | 000-M49 sample test | 1Z0-536 VCE | HP2-T26 practice test | 000-034 examcollection | 922-099 dumps | C2010-590 brain dumps | HP0-J49 practice test | ACMA-6-1 test prep | C2040-412 real questions | HP0-T21 pdf download | 9A0-384 questions and answers | 210-255 exam prep | 200-150 Practice test | 000-023 brain dumps | 7130X real questions | 000-233 questions answers | C2090-461 questions and answers | ES0-004 braindumps | HP0-D09 cram |
killexams.com 000-302 Brain Dumps with Real Questions
We are doing effort to supplying you with actual DB2 9 Database and Application(R) Fundamentals - Academic Initiative exam questions and answers, along explanations. Each Q&A on killexams.com has been showed by means of IBM certified experts. They are tremendously qualified and confirmed humans, who have several years of professional experience recognized with the IBM assessments.
The best thing to get success within the IBM 000-302 exam is that you just got to get dependable brain dumps. we have an approach to guarantee that killexams.com is the most direct pathway towards IBM DB2 9 Database and Application(R) Fundamentals - Academic Initiative test. you will succeed with full surety. you will be able to see free questions at killexams.com before you get the 000-302 exam dumps. Our mimicked tests are similar to the real test style. The 000-302 Questions and Answers collected by the certified professionals, they furnish you the expertise of taking the important exam. 100% guarantee to pass the 000-302 real exam. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders Click http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/000-302 The most important issue that's in any capability vital here is downloading reliable dumps and passing the 000-302 - DB2 9 Database and Application(R) Fundamentals - Academic Initiative test. All that you just need will be a high score of IBM 000-302 exam. the solesolitary issue you wish to try is downloading braindumps of 000-302 exam from reliable resource. we are not letting you down and we will do every help to you pass your 000-302 exam. 3 Months free access to latest brain dumps is sufficient to pass the exam. Each candidate will bear the price of the 000-302 exam dumps through killexams.com requiring very little to no effort. There's no risk concerned the least bit.
killexams.com have our specialists Team to guarantee our IBM 000-302 exam questions are dependably the most recent. They are on the whole extremely acquainted with the exams and testing focus.
How killexams.com keep IBM 000-302 exams updated?: we have our uncommon approaches to know the most recent exams data on IBM 000-302. Now and then we contact our accomplices who are exceptionally comfortable with the testing focus or once in a while our clients will email us the latest input, or we got the most recent update from our dumps providers. When we discover the IBM 000-302 exams changed then we updates them ASAP.
On the off chance that you truly come up short this 000-302 DB2 9 Database and Application(R) Fundamentals - Academic Initiative and would prefer not to sit tight for the updates then we can give you full refund. however, you ought to send your score answer to us with the goal that we can have a check. We will give you full refund quickly amid our working time after we get the IBM 000-302 score report from you.
IBM 000-302 DB2 9 Database and Application(R) Fundamentals - Academic Initiative Product Demo?: we have both PDF version and Testing Software. You can check our product page to perceive what it would appear that like.
At the point when will I get my 000-302 material after I pay?: Generally, After successful payment, your username/password are sent at your email address within 5 min. It may take little longer if your bank delay in payment authorization.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
Killexams HP5-Z01D test prep | Killexams HP0-234 mock exam | Killexams CIA-III-2012 braindumps | Killexams HP2-E57 test prep | Killexams E20-360 questions and answers | Killexams HH0-220 study guide | Killexams 090-161 practice exam | Killexams CGRN real questions | Killexams 1Z0-100 examcollection | Killexams 70-467 real questions | Killexams CAU301 braindumps | Killexams HP0-D24 test questions | Killexams 1T6-540 questions and answers | Killexams C2090-610 free pdf download | Killexams 1Z0-897 exam questions | Killexams A2010-005 free pdf | Killexams E20-375 brain dumps | Killexams 9L0-422 Practice Test | Killexams NSE4-5-4 sample test | Killexams 922-104 study guide |
Killexams 501-01 braindumps | Killexams HP2-B75 Practice Test | Killexams 312-49v9 Practice test | Killexams 156-315-1 questions and answers | Killexams 77-885 braindumps | Killexams 1Z0-507 VCE | Killexams 000-N03 study guide | Killexams HP0-Y23 real questions | Killexams 9A0-035 examcollection | Killexams A2040-928 pdf download | Killexams A2090-463 braindumps | Killexams HP0-402 cheat sheets | Killexams 1Y0-740 study guide | Killexams A2010-654 free pdf | Killexams 642-416 dump | Killexams C5050-062 test prep | Killexams 000-M93 questions answers | Killexams E20-555 practice questions | Killexams HP0-J51 study guide | Killexams C2180-374 test questions |
By Sean M. Calhoun, John Raquet and Gilbert L. Peterson
TO MEET THE ACCURACY, availability, continuity and integrity requirements for many navigation applications, multiple-sensor systems are commonly used. For example, a GPS receiver might be combined with an inertial measurement unit, electronic compass and an altimeter to permit enhanced navigation accuracy, availability and continuity in obstructed or otherwise difficult environments. The use of arrays of sensors can also help to ensure that systems used in safety-critical navigation applications provide safe information by maintaining a high level of integrity.
An important group of devices that can be used in multi-sensor systems is one whose processes are based on light. These optical or vision-based devices include laser rangefinders and digital cameras. We could even consider our eyes to be in this group. In common with many other animals, we have built-in visual sensors to get around in our daily lives. Together with our memories, we use our eyes to get safely from one place to another. Ancient mariners tended to sail close to shore so that they could use visual cues for navigation. Later on, they learned how to use the light from celestial objects to navigate in the open ocean. And these days, while we could use the so-called “Mark 1 Eyeball” to continuously monitor the performance of a navigation system, this is often impractical, impossible or unwise.
In this month’s column, we’ll take a look at the development of a generalized vision-aided integrity monitor for precision relative navigation applications. The work is based on the concept of using a single-camera vision system, such as a visible-light or infrared electro-optical sensor, to monitor the occurrence of unacceptably large and potentially unsafe relative navigation errors. A vision-aided integrity monitor of this type could be extremely valuable in augmenting existing precision relative navigation systems, such as GPS, for many different safety-critical aerospace applications such as formation flying, aerial refueling, rendezvous/docking systems, and even precision landing.
It is particularly appropriate that such vision-aided systems be discussed at the present time since 2015 is the International Year of Light and Light-based Technologies, or IYL 2015. This United Nations initiative aims to raise awareness of the achievements of light science and its applications, and its importance to humankind. As mentioned on the IYL 2015 website, “[l]ight plays a vital role in our daily lives and is an imperative cross-cutting discipline of science in the 21st century. It has revolutionized medicine, opened up international communication via the Internet, and continues to be central to linking cultural, economic and political aspects of the global society.”
2015 is also an important anniversary year for several notable developments in our understanding of light. It is the 1,000th anniversary of the work of the Arabic scholar Ibn Al-Haytham, which culminated in his Book of Optics. A Latin translation significantly influenced a number of scholars in medieval and renaissance Europe including Leonardo da Vinci, Galileo Galilei, and Johannes Kepler. 2015 is also the 200th anniversary of Augustin-Jean Fresnel’s proposal that light behaves as a wave and the 150th anniversary of the publication of James Clerk Maxwell’s paper describing electromagnetic wave propagation as we discussed in “Insights” this past March. And we should also mention that 2015 is the 100th anniversary of the publication of Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity, which includes a description of the propagation of light and other electromagnetic waves in the presence of a gravitational field. And where would GPS and the other global navigation satellite systems and their augmentations be without the understanding that general relativity provides? Nowhere.
“Innovation” is a regular feature that discusses advances in GPS technology and its applications as well as the fundamentals of GPS positioning. The column is coordinated by Richard Langley of the Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick. He welcomes comments and topic ideas. Email him at lang @ unb.ca.
Recently, there has been an increased recognition of GNSS limitations in terms of robustness, availability and interference. As a result of this recognition, there has been renewed interest in developing non-GNSS-based navigation systems to augment system capability. This has become particularly important with the trend toward autonomous systems, where required navigation performance (RNP) metrics, such as accuracy, integrity, continuity and availability become operational drivers. Because of this trend, there is renewed interest in gaining navigational diversity using imaging or vision-aided navigation approaches. Early research with vision systems used 3-D terrain databases and imaging systems to provide periodic position updates in collaboration with onboard inertial navigation systems (INS), much like radar systems did prior to the wide proliferation of GNSS.
For precision relative navigation applications such as formation flying, aerial refueling, rendezvous and docking systems and even precision landing, there is a significant body of research for the use of vision navigation systems. For example, a vision-based relative navigation solution for aerial refueling with the use of an a priori 3-D tanker model has been developed. Results from flight tests showed that image-rendering relative navigation is a viable precision navigation technique for close formation flight, specifically aerial refueling, and demonstrated 95% relative navigation accuracies on the order of 35 centimeters within the operational envelope.
As the body of vision-aided navigation research continues to grow, consideration of other RNP metrics is required. Ensuring that systems are providing safe information and maintaining a high level of integrity is paramount when considering safety-critical navigation applications, but is largely neglected in current vision-navigation research.
The concept of integrity, particularly for navigation systems, refers to the level of trust that can be placed in a navigation system in terms of detecting gross errors and divergences. Many navigation applications have adopted the use of protection levels, which are real-time navigation system outputs that bound the navigation errors to the required probability of integrity risk. For the case of vertical navigation, the vertical navigation system error (NSE) is bounded by the real-time vertical protection level (VPL), and as the long as the VPL is below the vertical alert limit (VAL), the system can continue its operation. Loss of integrity is defined by the case when the NSE > VAL without an alert or, in other words, when NSE > VAL and VPL ≤ VAL.
One of the richest sources of information for how integrity can be handled for precision relative navigation systems can be found with the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS), which focused on providing integrity under fault-free and single ground reference receiver failure conditions. LAAS employs several quality monitors such as receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM).
Much of the vision-aided navigation research to date has focused more on system and algorithmic robustness, rather than quantitative and verifiable integrity, particularly for feature-based processing. One approach has introduced the concept of regional bounding for feature correspondence between time-sequenced image frames, including some feature-unique criteria that can provide some protection from feature correspondence errors. Although this approach does yield some robustness for the algorithms, no quantitative integrity characterization was developed. Another approach introduced a truly quantitative integrity monitor for failures in the mapping of features to pixels, particularly in the presence of a bias. This approach predicts the largest possible position error in the presence of one such bias due to feature mismatch using a GPS RAIM-type approach. The current state of research addressing integrity for vision navigation, using an image-rendering or template-matching approach, is even less mature. In fact, we have not identified any previous integrity-specific work for image-rendering vision navigation.
The research presented in this article generalizes the concept of integrity in terms of operating and alerting regions. Applications that use navigation systems generally have objective operating regions that require a certain navigation performance, whether this be around a glide-slope, a formation flight position or even a flight-path clearance. Navigation integrity becomes critical because large divergences from these operating regions, without an alert, can become safety risks. The alert limit is simply the instantiation of this concept. It is the threshold or measure of how much undetected divergence from the operating region can be tolerated without inducing unacceptably large safety risks.
The remaining sections of this article will describe the development of a rigorous and quantitative vision-aided integrity monitor for precision relative navigation systems. First, an introduction to relative navigation using image rendering will be covered in order to describe the fundamental vision navigation approach. This will be followed by a detailed derivation of the proposed vision-aided integrity monitor and simulation based performance results.Using Image Rendering
The basis of our research is that vision-aided techniques, specifically image rendering, can be used to construct a high-performance integrity monitor for precision relative navigation systems. Image rendering approaches and/or template matching have been used extensively in vision applications such as machine vision, medical image registration, object detection and pose estimation, and recently as a precision navigation system for applications such as aerial refueling and formation flight. The general concept of image-rendering precision relative navigation was evaluated for an automated aerial refueling application, using the approach illustrated in Figure 1. The image rendering approach is based on comparing image sensors with rendered imagery from high-fidelity models, to estimate a relative location based on the best image correspondence.
The image correspondence process is the most critical aspect of the image-rendering or template-matching navigation approach, but the focus of our research is not to make claims of optimality or performance-difference judgments between these image correspondence techniques, but rather show feasibility in the overall vision-aided integrity approach using some of these techniques. Most image correspondence approaches transform the images into feature space, such as scale-invariant feature transform, silhouette, edges and corners, to name a few, and then compute a distance metric between the feature sets, such as Minkowski or Mahalanobis distance, to determine the degree of matching.
Once the actual sensor image is converted to feature space, rendered images are generated based on the relative navigation state estimate using the model, converted to feature space, and compared to the sensor features. This process is repeated across the navigation state space, computing an image correspondence value for each state estimate. The selected navigation state estimate is based on the “best” image correspondence value across the state space.
An example result of this process is presented in FIGURE 2, which shows correspondence values for an edge-based image-correspondence process. In this case, the minimum correspondence value represents the best estimate of the relative navigation state. These image correspondence values between the sensor image (IS) and the rendered reference images (IR) will form the basis for the integrity monitor detection rule.Vision-Aided Integrity Monitor Development
As indicated in the preceding sections, our research is based on defining a vision-aided integrity monitor in terms of detecting when the system navigation state (x) is within a specified operating region (XOR) versus being within the alert region state space (XAR). The integrity monitor can yield four distinct conditions: rejection (PR), misdetection (PMD), detection (PD) and false-alarm (PFA). The performance of this type of binary (H0/H1) detection scheme can be characterized using just two of these metrics, the detection and false-alarm rates, which will be the two primary performance metrics for this research. PD is the primary metric measuring navigation integrity, describing the probability that the monitor successfully detects the condition when x ∈ XAR.
Bayesian, Minimax and Neyman-Pearson are a few of the detection schemes available to solve this type of binary detection problem. These detection schemes rely on the knowledge of the underlying statistics of the H0 and H1 condition, often characterized in terms of the probability density functions (PDFs). The main difference between these approaches is the resulting detection rule value (δ). Once δ has been established, the resulting theoretical performances of the detectors are computed by integrating the underlying PDFs of the H0 and H1 conditions, pH0 and pH1 respectively. The probability of detection (PD) is computed as
The integrity performance of the monitor can also be described in terms of integrity risk or probability of missed detection
(PMD), which is computed as
Similarly, the probability of false-alarm (PFA) is computed as
This is represented graphically in FIGURE 3.
The PDFs represent the statistical distributions of image correspondence values for the respective H0/H1 condition. The general detection rule premise is such that for a given sensor image, the underlying PDF for the “best” image correspondence with the rendered reference set is sufficiently distinct when the sensor image is in an H0 condition versus H1. The characteristics of the H0/H1 PDFs that dictate the monitor performance are dependent on many factors, including the fidelity and accuracy of the world model, the general observability of the image rendering process and the image correspondence approach for the specific application. For our research, we used two image correspondence techniques to evaluate the overall integrity monitor approach.
The first image correspondence technique evaluated is a simple binary silhouette (SIL). In this approach, both the sensor image IS(x) and reference image set IR() are converted to a silhouette using pre-defined thresholds to first convert the red-green-blue (RGB) images to gray scale and then subsequently to a binary image. An image correspondence function computes the percentage of overlap between the silhouettes.
The resulting image correspondence is based on the ratio of the cardinality of these sets. The navigation state estimate () that yields the maximum image correspondence value from the set of rendered reference images or template database is considered the most likely for that particular image sensor (IS).
The second image correspondence utilizes edge features for the image correspondence process. Under this approach, magnitude of gradient (GRD) processing is used, in which the sensor image and the rendered reference images are preprocessed through a Prewitt filter to determine changes in image intensities between adjacent pixels. This process computes the components of the gradient. The gradient magnitude is computed by root-sum-squaring the x-y components and normalized, resulting in an edge detection. A Gaussian blur filter is then applied to the output of the edge detection.
The application of the Gaussian blurring compensates for the spatial discrepancies between the discrete reference set or template database and the sensor image. Finally, the resulting feature images, including both the reference image (IR_GRD) and the sensor image (IS_GRD), are processed through a sum-squared-difference (SSD) image correspondence.
The resulting PDFs are based on the best image correspondence with the RE reference set, which is the minimum for the GRD processing.
These image correspondences build the basis of the detection metric, utilizing both the sensor image (IS) and the rendered reference set (IR), which is spatially distributed across the operating region, illustrated by FIGURE 4. This illustrated example shows instances of both a H0 and H1 sensor image (blue and red, respectively). The underlying H0/H1 PDFs for establishing the detection threshold are determined by sampling sensor images from XOR and XAR and computing the image correspondence against IR. This can be done through a combination of high-fidelity simulation and/or test data. The overall performance of the integrity monitor will be dictated by these underlying distributions. The following sections show the results of this integrity monitor approach for an aerial refueling application.Simulation Evaluation
To explore the performance of the proposed integrity monitor approach, an aerial refueling (AR) application was modeled within a simulation environment. The AR operation lends itself well to the construct of the proposed integrity monitor and is developed to show that the system (refueling aircraft) is in the refueling envelope (RE) and has not violated the alert limit, which in the AR case is the safety boundary (SB). In this operational case, H0 is defined as the condition when the integrity monitor determines the refueling aircraft is in the RE, and H1 as the case when the integrity monitor determines the refueling aircraft to be within the SB. A validity region is also defined in order to bound the problem, in which it is assumed that the refueling aircraft is always within, under both H0 and H1 conditions, as shown in FIGURE 5.
To determine the underlying H0/H1 distributions, a set of reference images uniformly sampled from the RE was rendered using the associated tanker and camera models. This rendered image set was used as the common basis for performing the image correspondence with the actual sensor image.
The baseline RE reference set used for this research was developed using 504 rendered images distributed in a spherically uniform manner across the entire RE volume. Then, two random sets of simulated sensor images were generated and drawn from both RE and SB regions. It is assumed that the refueling aircraft and corresponding sensor images are within the validity region in order to bound the simulation. This bounding assumption is an acceptable constraint, given that the system most likely had to pass several operational checks to ensure the refueling aircraft is in the general region of the RE as defined by the validity region. To get detailed statistical representation of the PDFs, particularly at the tails of the distribution, both RE and SB image sets included more than 100,000 simulated sensor images, representing true states of the refueling aircraft. The simulation environment for this analysis uses the same refueling tanker model for the sensor images and the RE reference set, which eliminates the effects of modeling errors. Additionally, variations in the attitude are currently not considered. The resulting PDFs for H0 (blue) and H1 (red) conditions are shown in FIGURE 6.
Figure 6 shows generally good distinction between the H0 and H1 hypotheses — a necessary condition to achieve good detection performance. Several techniques were evaluated for determining the PDF including histogram, nearest neighbor and kernel with a Gaussian weighting function. These underlying H0 and H1 distributions will be used as the basis for designing the detection thresholds, based on the image correspondence of the sensor image with the RE reference set. These results assume uniform prior distributions across the RE and SB regions; however, it would be relatively straightforward to incorporate non-uniform prior information, based on a particular application, as available.
Detection schemes are often characterized using receiver operating characteristics or ROC curves, which illustrate the detection-monitor trade-off between probability of detection and probability of false alarm. The predicted detection performance for this AR application is a function of these underlying H0/H1 PDFs, and this performance is captured in the ROC curves shown in FIGURE 7. The ROC curves show that 10-3 level integrity-monitor detection performance (PD) is realizable for both SIL and GRD image correspondence approaches, while still maintaining a reasonable probability of false alarm (PFA) of less than 0.05 (5%). The SIL approach demonstrates slightly better performance than GRD under the chosen image resolution and RE reference set density. Normally, theoretical ROC curves would extend through the whole range of values [0,1] for both PD and PFA; however, this assumes unbounded PDFs. Doing so would require an infinite number of simulation cases and is obviously not practical for a simulation evaluation to gain statistics necessary to extend the PDFs near the entire theoretical ranges. Overbounding of the PDF tails could be performed to extrapolate and extend the tails of H0/H1 PDFs to determine the integrity detection performance beyond the current ranges, but this was not performed as part of this research.
In most applications, conditions exist that are outside of the nominally defined operational envelope, but yet are not significant enough deviations to be considered safety risks that require alerts and action. Such a case exists for the refueling operation under consideration in this research, where there exists a region outside the RE, but not in the SB, which we will refer to as the operational limit volume (OLV). The current definitions of H0 and H1 for the vision-aided integrity-monitor approaches developed above only consider conditions within the RE or the SB volume, and not within the OLV volume. OLV conditions were omitted since they technically aren’t considered a safety or integrity risk. However, it is possible under certain implementations and operational considerations that integrity monitoring coverage is desired under these OLV conditions.
Using the same analysis process as the original evaluation, an updated simulation was performed, this time considering all points within the validity region, including the OLV points. To construct a detection scheme under this new paradigm, the OLV conditions must be either mapped to the existing H0 or H1 hypotheses, or a new hypothesis must be defined, possibly creating an M-ary hypothesis scenario. The approach taken for this research was to consider OLV conditions as a safety risk, which is a conservative approach, rather than defining any new hypotheses. The resulting image correspondence distributions are shown in FIGURE 8. Subplots (a) and (b) show the difference the OLV points have on the underlying PDF distributions. As expected, when the OLV points are excluded, the PDFs track the original distributions quite well. The impact of including sensor locations from the OLV is clear from these figures, yielding a much bigger overlap between the H0/H1 conditions.
Much like the PDFs, the ROC curves align with the previous results quite well when the OLV conditions are omitted, but take a order of magnitude integrity performance hit when OLV is captured under the existing H0/H1 definition and detection thresholds. Even under this conservative assumption, the overall monitor performance still yields a 0.96 (96%) detection rate at a 0.05 (5%) false-alarm rate, as illustrated by the ROC curves shown in subplots (c) and (d) of Figure 8. It is likely that these results could be significantly improved by redefining the terms of the H0 and H1 conditions or defining an H2 condition specifically for the OLV region.Sensitivity Analysis
In addition to the baseline integrity monitor results, various sensitivity studies were performed to evaluate the integrity monitor performance impacts of environmental and hardware considerations. These sensitivity evaluations focused on common vision-based considerations such as sensor distortions and lighting conditions, and monitor design choices such as pixel resolution and reference image density. The sensitivity aspects that were evaluated under this research included the number of reference images, the effects of image distortion, pixel resolution and lighting conditions.
Reference Set Density. In addition to our standard reference set of 504 RE images, we conducted tests using 288 and 729 images. While a larger number of images improves integrity detection performance, processing speed is decreased. It is possible to trade off processing power for performance as necessary for a particular application and the associated integrity monitor performance requirements.
Image Distortion. We applied radial and tangential distortions to the simulated sensor images (IS) such that they represented a 95% certainty of the residual error to represent an outer envelope case for this type of sensor. The impact on the H0/H1 PDFs is very minimal, and the results demonstrate a potential robustness to this common type of sensor effect.
Pixel Resolution. We evaluated eight different pixel resolutions from 12 × 9 to 1280 × 1024 pixels per image. Our results showed a surprising robustness to pixel resolution, indicating only marginal performance impacts down to extremely limited pixel densities.
Lighting Conditions. To explore the impact of lighting conditions, the simulated sensor images (IS) used as the basis for the sensitivity analysis were regenerated under a secondary lighting condition, intended to emulate a much brighter background environment, and processed against the original RE reference set. The results demonstrate that under these varying lighting conditions, the system again demonstrates a high level of robustness, particularly using the SIL image correspondence approach.Ratio Test Integrity Test
The initial integrity monitor results discussed thus far only used reference images from the operational region, RE. However, it is also possible to use a reference image set created with rendered images from the alert region, SB, by including an additional image correspondence process between the sensor image and rendered SB reference set. This is done to create a ratio test statistic as the detection metric. We compute the ratio of the highest image correspondence between the RE and SB reference sets. This approach is very analogous to the use of ratio tests for GNSS carrier-phase integer fixing.
The resulting ROC detection performance of the ratio threshold approach showed that, as with the single RE reference set, the SIL image correspondence approach yields the best H1 detection performance, resulting in the best integrity protection.
The GRD ratio detection performance also yields improved performance and is comparable to the SIL image correspondence approach solely with RE reference set.Conclusions and Future Work
In this article, we have discussed the feasibility of a vision-aided integrity monitor for precision relative navigation systems. The research posed the relative navigation integrity problem within the context of an aerial refueling application. Using image rendering, where an imaging sensor and high-fidelity 3-D model is used, we have shown that 10-3 to 10-5 level of integrity monitoring is attainable for aerial refueling and formation flight applications. Having this level of independent monitoring could provide significant relief to a GPS-based precision relative-navigation system from a system-safety and certification perspective. The research demonstrated the proposed integrity monitor was robust against several degrading imaging effects, including lens distortions, lighting conditions and reductions in pixel resolution. Although more work is required to validate the results of this research, which was based on simulated images, the results show high promise for this type of integrity monitor approach.Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.Acknowledgment
This article is based on the paper “Vision-Aided Integrity Monitor for Precision Relative Navigation Systems” presented at ITM 2015, the 2015 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation held in Dana Point, Calif., Jan. 26–28, 2015.
SEAN CALHOUN is the managing director at CAL Analytics, Columbus, Ohio, and is pursuing his Ph.D. degree at the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT), Wright-Paterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
JOHN RAQUET is the director of the Autonomy and Navigation Technology Center at AFIT, where he is also a professor of electrical engineering.
GILBERT L. PETERSON is a professor of computer science at AFIT and vice chair of the International Federation for Information Processing Working Group 11.9, Digital Forensics.FURTHER READING
“Vision-Aided Integrity Monitor for Precision Relative Navigation Systems” by S.M. Calhoun, J. Raquet and G. Peterson in Proceedings of ITM 2015, the 2015 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Dana Point, Calif., Jan. 26–28, 2015.
“Flight Test Evaluation of Image Rendering Navigation for Close-Formation Flight” by S.M. Calhoun, J. Raquet and J. Curro in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2012, the 25th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17–21, 2012, pp. 826–832.
Using Predictive Rendering as a Vision-Aided Technique for Autonomous Aerial Refueling by A.D. Weaver, M.S. thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, March 2009.
“Fusing Low-Cost Image and Inertial Sensors for Passive Navigation” by M. Veth and J. Raquet in Navigation: Journal of The Institute of Navigation, Vol. 54, No. 1, Spring 2007, pp. 11–20. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-4296.2007.tb00391.x.
“Automated Rendezvous and Docking Sensor Testing at the Flight Robotics Laboratory” by J.D. Mitchell, S.P. Cryan, D. Strack, L.L. Brewster, M.J. Williamson, R.T. Howard and A.S. Johnston in Proceedings of 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Mont., March 3–10, 2007, doi: 10.1109/AERO.2007.352723.
“Performance of Integrated Electro-Optical Navigation Systems” by T. Hoshizaki, D. Andrisani II, A.W. Braun, A.K. Mulyana and J.S. Bethel in Navigation: Journal of The Institute of Navigation, Vol. 51, No. 2, Summer 2004, pp. 101–121, doi: 10.1002/j.2161-4296.2004.tb00344.x.
“A Review of Recent Developments in Simultaneous Localization and Mapping” by G. Dissanayake, S. Huang, Z. Wang and R. Ranasinghe in Proceedings of 6th IEEE International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems, Kandy, Sri Lanka, Aug. 16–19, 2011, pp. 477–482, doi: 10.1109/ICIINFS.2011.6038117.
“Developing a Framework for Image-based Integrity” by C. Larson, J.F. Raquet and M.J. Veth in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2009, the 22nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division The Institute of Navigation, Savannah, Ga., Sept. 22–25, 2009, pp. 778–789.
“From RAIM to NIOAIM: A New Integrity Approach to Integrated Multi-GNSS Systems” by P.Y. Hwang and R.G. Brown in Inside GNSS, Vol. 3, No. 4, May-June 2008, pp. 24–33.
Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards for Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS), DO-245A, by RTCA SC-159 WG-4, RTCA Inc., Washington, D.C., December 2004.
“Flexible Camera Calibration by Viewing a Plane from Unknown Orientations” by Z. Zhang in Proceedings of ICCV’99, the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Kerkya, Greece, Sept. 20–27, 1999, Vol. 1, pp. 666–673, doi: 10.1109/ICCV.1999.791289.
Digital Image Processing, 4th Ed., by W.K. Pratt, published by John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2007.
Digital Image Processing, 3rd Ed., by R.C. Gonzalez and R.E. Woods, published by Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2007.
Detection of Signals in Noise, 2nd Ed., by R. N. McDonough and A.D. Whalen, published by Academic Press, Inc., Waltham, Mass., 1995.
An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation, 2nd Ed., by H.V. Poor, published by Dowden & Culver, an imprint of Springer, New York. 1994.
China, India, Singapore and Vietnam First to Take Advantage of Discounted Online Certification Testing for Rational Software Tools
SINGAPORE - May 2008: IBM (NYSE: IBM) today announced a new program to help university students in Asia enhance their skills to compete in a global market. The new program will allow students at more than 2,100 institutions in India, China, Singapore and Vietnam to enhance their credentials and better compete for the growing number of technology positions available in the region.
Year-to-year demand for IBM software certification has surged because certifications help the industry locate and hire top software developers by creating an industry-leading method of building and validating skills. Giving students access to online exams will help increase the number of qualified, skilled software developers available to meet a growing opportunity for software innovation worldwide.
According to online employment resource Monster.com, 1.5 million skilled IT experts will be needed by 2012 -- a trend that is fueling major opportunities for innovation and career growth for IT students especially in India, China and Southeast Asia.
For a discounted rate of $30, students at universities across these four countries now have access to 25 Web-based exams covering IBM’s Rational software delivery portfolio. Twenty-two different certifications are available in emerging technology job areas such as architecture management, change and release management, process and portfolio management, and quality management.
IBM plans to offer this discounted certification testing to students worldwide starting in the second half of 2008.
“Our customers and partners have told us how invaluable IBM’s certification offer is in cultivating their skilled workforce,” said Jim Corgel, general manager of IBM’s ISV and Developer Relations. “In Asian countries such as Vietnam, the IT industry is anticipated to be a key driver of the local economy. By expanding this program to the region, we are developing a loyal community of highly skilled certified professionals who continue to innovate around open standards and collaborative technologies.”
In India and China alone, the number of certifications has increased an average of 5 percent. Interest for certifications in Vietnam and Singapore is expected to rise at a similar pace as these emerging markets continue to attract global IBM customers.
At Nanyang Polytechnic (NYP) in Singapore, more than 157 students have attained IBM certifications with 60 certified on Rational Application Developer for WebSphere Software.
“We are constantly reminded that the IT workforce is very competitive. To stay ahead, we need to continually increase our credibility and distinguish ourselves. Achieving the IBM certification has increased my self-confidence and competency, and the greatest reward was in gaining employment in Standard Chartered Bank as a software developer,” said Miss Lin XinZhen, a graduate in Diploma in Information Technology at Nanyang Polytechnic who has been certified in Rational Application Developer V6.0. “I am very grateful to NYP, especially to my dedicated lecturers, for providing guidance and encouragement to attain the IBM certification.”
In China, IBM offers Rational curriculum support to more than 50 partner universities, covering 20,000 students each year. In 2007, 163 students passed IBM Rational Application Developer global certification. With 22 Rational software products available to students at a minimal cost, the number of students who attend Rational credit courses and obtain Rational certifications will grow.
“IBM’s certification program has become an essential part in the curriculum and skill training both for undergraduate and graduate students,” said Professor Zhang Jiawan, Vice Dean of Software Studies at Tianjin University who teaches J2EE Application Development courses to over 100 students a year. “It helps our students to learn the latest in industry-leading software engineering techniques, tools and the software development process. It enriches our students’ engineering experiences by promoting their practical skills and specialty standardization, and also broadens options for career planning.”
Certification exams are administered by IBM proctors at a participating university’s computer lab or on IBM-supplied computers at a designated testing site. The proctors ensure that tests are successfully taken via the Prometric Prime system in a secure, closed-book environment.
The new program offers convenient testing and complements the existing Test Center network available through Prometric, which delivers certification testing for 19 different IBM software and hardware products.
IBM also recently announced its DB2 Certified Professional Program which offers DB2 9 Fundamentals certification exams free of charge and provides a 50 percent discount on all IBM WebSphere, SOA and XML certification exams.
IBM’s Academic Initiative provides courseware, software, instructor preparation, discounts on certification testing, and a résumé database to increase student exposure to IBM customers and business partners.Related Links Source
This news content was configured by WebWire editorial staff. Linking is permitted.
News Release Distribution and Press Release Distribution Services Provided by WebWire.
Let's cut right to the chase and run down Babcock's 12 inaugural choices for the software hall of fame. Coming in at Number 12 is The Morris Worm. This nasty …
>Veteran technology journalist Charles Babcock has written a terrific article for Information Week called "What's the Greatest Software Ever Written?". His selections are sure to spark a flood of e-mail responses to the weekly IT publication from software developers (who are well known to be passionate about this topic in particular). In general, though, he should get high marks from most. He's clearly done his homework.
Let's cut right to the chase and run down Babcock's 12 inaugural choices for the software hall of fame. Coming in at Number 12 is The Morris Worm. This nasty little program was crafted by a college student named Robert Morris, who when arrested by the FBI claimed that he had only the best intentions in mind when he released his worm onto the world's networks and brought machines to their knees around the globe. He said he was only attempting to determine the size of the Internet. Clever defense.
Number 11, according to Babcock, is the Google ranking algorithm. It wasn't the first search engine, not by a long shot. But it made search friendly for even the least technical among us. "The value of an academic paper is measured by the number of times it's mentioned in other papers and footnotes," one of Babcock's sources told him. "Google adapted that convention to the Web."
In a brilliant choice, in our opinion, Babcock slots NASA's Apollo guidance system at Number 10. Using 8 kilobytes of memory on a circa 1968 Raytheon computer, it controlled the systems that enabled astronauts to navigate to the moon, separate their lunar module from its docked orbiter, descend to the sphere's surface and find their way home again, in a round trip of a half million miles. Not bad for something so tiny.
Babcock's Number 9 is Microsoft Excel. His rationale? Spreadsheet programs had been around for years before the folks at Redmond took their stab at one; but when they did, they got things right. And then went about the business of making their competitors obsolete.
Number 8 on the list is the original Macintosh OS. It has been duly criticized as being derivative, taking much of its inspiration from Xerox's Alto, one of the very first personal computers. Rightly so. But greatness is also measured by success and historical impact, Babcock argues. The original Mac was a landmark OS.
The Number 7 position goes to American Airline's Sabre reservation system. It was the grand-daddy of travel service automation. Sure, it had its critics in its day, including the U.S. government's anti-trust division, but it was also revolutionary, blazing a path in tactical and strategic business applications.
Number 6 on the Babcock hit parade is the Mosaic browser. Developed by graduate students to help navigate the new World Wide Web, it created a world of its own, and we have never stopped relying on its successors ever since. Spawning everything from Netscape's Navigator to Apple's Safari, this essential app was the originator of the Internet boom.
Registering at Number 5 is the Java programming language. Critics will point to this choice and bemoan the "network programming language" (Time magazine's 1996 Product of the Year) as the Internet's first great hype machine. Babcock admits that he was an early critic of Java, but he says that he has since come around to admiring the sophistication of its approach.
He gives the IBM System 360 OS the Number 4 spot. This 1964 operating system for big iron was a revolution and a revelation. Many of the fundamentals of computer system design were ironed out by IBM in this historic project. To this day, IBM systems rely on the breakthroughs it made forty years ago.
Number 3 on the list is one of the most profound applications ever attempted: the Institute for Genomic Research's human genome sequencing program. This ambitious application set out to beat a U.S government project to map the DNA composition of 20 000 human genes. It did just that. As one of Babcock's sources commented, "[O]n sheer technical brilliance, it gets 10 out of 10."
Babcock awards the runner-up prize to IBM's System R, the progenitor of relational databases—from DB2, to Oracle, to Sybase, to MySQL, and others. It took set theory and applied it to data storage and retrieval. As a result, relational database management systems have become the underpinning of much of our modern computing infrastructure.
And last but first, Babcock crowns a multi-headed phenomenon known as the Unix family. This famous set of aunts, uncles, and cousins contains some of the most powerful and elegant coding ever created by an individual, team, corporation, or global community of collaborators. Originally, a pet project of an AT&T researcher, Ken Thompson, Unix and its descendants—notably Unix System III, Linux, and BSD 4.3—have had the broadest impact on the world of any computer programs ever written. And of all the Unix family members, in the end, Babcock selects Berkeley Software Distributions' BSD 4.3 as the single "Greatest Piece of Software Ever."
Now, let the passionate discussions begin!
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [14 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11487512
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-mB
Scribd : https://www.scribd.com/document/357222611/Pass4sure-000-302-Practice-Tests-with-Real-Questions
weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000PQUE
Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/000-302
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12049352
Youtube : https://youtu.be/vRYKgFyIhPg
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2017/10/just-study-these-ibm-000-302-questions.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/WhereCanIGetHelpToPass000-302Exam
Vimeo : https://vimeo.com/243257795
Google+ : https://plus.google.com/112153555852933435691/posts/3Qsqpx33JHS?hl=en
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/looking-for-000-302-exam-dumps-that-works-in-real-exam
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/account/book#
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/3xm2ntgp23057fxvcuz322sytm9e1w49
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5clyi6fbb69c0ed4f4948b9ec1d72d3757979